Emergency response to terrorist attacks: results of the federal-conducted evaluation process in Germany.
First responders
Lessons learned
Mission strategies
Safety
Terror attack
Journal
European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society
ISSN: 1863-9941
Titre abrégé: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101313350
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
04
01
2020
accepted:
10
03
2020
pubmed:
25
3
2020
medline:
21
4
2021
entrez:
25
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rescue missions during terrorist attacks are extremely challenging for all rescue forces (police as well as non-police forces) involved. To improve the quality and safety of the rescue missions during an active killing event, it is obligatory to adapt common rescue mission goals and strategies. After the recent attacks in Europe, the Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance started an evaluation process on behalf of the Federal Ministry of the Interior and the Federal Ministry of Health. This was done to identify weaknesses, lessons learned and to formulate new adapted guidelines. The presented bullet point recommendations summarise the basic and most important results of the ongoing evaluation process for the Federal Republic of Germany. The safety of all the rescue forces and survival of the greatest possible number of casualties are the priority goals. Furthermore, the preservation and re-establishment of the socio-political integrity are the overarching goals of the management of active killing events. Strategic incident priorities are to stop the killing and to save as much lives as possible. The early identification and prioritised transportation of casualties with life-threatening non-controllable bleeding are major tasks and the shortest possible on-scene time is an important requirement with respect to safety issues. With respect to hazard prevention tactics within Germany, we attributed the highest priority impact to the bullet points. The focus of the process has now shifted to intense work about possible solutions for the identified deficits and implementation strategies of such solutions during mass killing incidents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32206880
doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01347-8
pii: 10.1007/s00068-020-01347-8
pmc: PMC7429537
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
725-730Références
Unfallchirurg. 2020 Jun;123(6):453-463
pubmed: 31690983
Crit Care. 2016 Feb 13;20:37
pubmed: 26872946
Crit Care. 2016 Apr 01;20:85
pubmed: 27039082
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:169-83
pubmed: 24159920
Chirurg. 2017 Oct;88(10):830-840
pubmed: 29149359
Lancet. 2015 Dec 19;386(10012):2535-8
pubmed: 26628327
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Oct;26(10):806-816
pubmed: 28676492
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69 Suppl 1:S10-3
pubmed: 20622602
Chirurg. 2017 Oct;88(10):821-829
pubmed: 28831517
Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2735-2738
pubmed: 28754492
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 19;26(1):87
pubmed: 30340516
BMJ. 2020 Jan 30;368:m298
pubmed: 32001528
Crit Care. 2016 Nov 8;20(1):362
pubmed: 27825363
World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):1168-75
pubmed: 18365272
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 24;18(5):521
pubmed: 25323086
JAMA Surg. 2017 May 1;152(5):419-420
pubmed: 28122085
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):947-53
pubmed: 24139220
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Apr 7;114(14):237-243
pubmed: 28446350
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014 Aug;29(4):421-8
pubmed: 24909363