Comparative Effectiveness of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Analysis.
acute stroke
comparative effectiveness
ischemic stroke
thrombectomy
treatment outcome
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 04 2020
07 04 2020
Historique:
entrez:
27
3
2020
pubmed:
27
3
2020
medline:
9
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background A heterogeneous patient population receives endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke caused by proximal large-vessel occlusion every day. We aimed to conduct a population-based study of EVT in the province of Alberta, Canada, to understand the effectiveness in a complete population and how the magnitude of effect differs from the artificial world of clinical trials. Methods and Results Within a 3-year period (April 2015 to March 2018), 576 patients fit the inclusion criteria of our study and constituted the EVT group of our analysis. The medical treatment group of the ESCAPE (Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT [Computed Tomography] to Recanalization Times) trial had 150 patients. Thus, our total sample size was 726. We captured outcomes in clinical routine using administrative data and a linked database method. Primary outcome of our study was home-time. Home-time refers to the number of days that the patient was back at premorbid living situation without increase in level of care within 90 days of index stroke event. Median age of patients was 70 years (interquartile range, 59-81 years), and 47.8% were women. Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 (interquartile range, 13-20). EVT was associated with an increased 90-day home-time by an average of 8.5 days compared with medical treatment alone using Cragg hurdle regression (
Identifiants
pubmed: 32208827
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014541
pmc: PMC7428615
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e014541Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Références
Neurology. 2017 Nov 7;89(19):1970-1976
pubmed: 29021355
Stroke. 2016 Jul;47(7):1946-52
pubmed: 27174527
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1009-18
pubmed: 25671797
JAMA. 2013 Jun 19;309(23):2480-8
pubmed: 23780461
Stroke. 2016 Mar;47(3):836-42
pubmed: 26892279
Can J Neurol Sci. 2019 Jan;46(1):51-56
pubmed: 30516454
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2296-306
pubmed: 25882510
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1282-1285
pubmed: 30896358
Neurology. 2012 Jun 5;78(23):1886-91
pubmed: 22665145
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1279-88
pubmed: 27673305
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1019-30
pubmed: 25671798
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(7):e014541
pubmed: 32208827
BMJ. 2018 Mar 9;360:k949
pubmed: 29523557
Stroke. 2019 Jul;50(7):1883-1886
pubmed: 31154945
Chest. 1998 Mar;113(3 Suppl):166S-171S
pubmed: 9515887
Stroke. 2006 Jan;37(1):263-6
pubmed: 16339467
Stroke. 2008 Jan;39(1):231-3
pubmed: 18032742
N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 10;373(11):1077
pubmed: 26352820
N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 10;373(11):1076
pubmed: 26352821
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jan;10(1):
pubmed: 28096208
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e010867
pubmed: 30561262
Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31
pubmed: 26898852
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jan 21;5(1):
pubmed: 26796252