Addressing microaggressions in racially charged patient-provider interactions: a pilot randomized trial.


Journal

BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 29 10 2018
accepted: 13 03 2020
entrez: 27 3 2020
pubmed: 27 3 2020
medline: 22 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Racial bias in medical care is a significant public health issue, with increased focus on microaggressions and the quality of patient-provider interactions. Innovations in training interventions are needed to decrease microaggressions and improve provider communication and rapport with patients of color during medical encounters. This paper presents a pilot randomized trial of an innovative clinical workshop that employed a theoretical model from social and contextual behavioral sciences. The intervention specifically aimed to decrease providers' likelihood of expressing biases and negative stereotypes when interacting with patients of color in racially charged moments, such as when patients discuss past incidents of discrimination. Workshop exercises were informed by research on the importance of mindfulness and interracial contact involving reciprocal exchanges of vulnerability and responsiveness. Twenty-five medical student and recent graduate participants were randomized to a workshop intervention or no intervention. Outcomes were measured via provider self-report and observed changes in targeted provider behaviors. Specifically, two independent, blind teams of coders assessed provider emotional rapport and responsiveness during simulated interracial patient encounters with standardized Black patients who presented specific racial challenges to participants. Greater improvements in observed emotional rapport and responsiveness (indexing fewer microaggressions), improved self-reported explicit attitudes toward minoritized groups, and improved self-reported working alliance and closeness with the Black standardized patients were observed and reported by intervention participants. Medical providers may be more likely to exhibit bias with patients of color in specific racially charged moments during medical encounters. This small-sample pilot study suggests that interventions that directly intervene to help providers improve responding in these moments by incorporating mindfulness and interracial contact may be beneficial in reducing racial health disparities.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Racial bias in medical care is a significant public health issue, with increased focus on microaggressions and the quality of patient-provider interactions. Innovations in training interventions are needed to decrease microaggressions and improve provider communication and rapport with patients of color during medical encounters.
METHODS METHODS
This paper presents a pilot randomized trial of an innovative clinical workshop that employed a theoretical model from social and contextual behavioral sciences. The intervention specifically aimed to decrease providers' likelihood of expressing biases and negative stereotypes when interacting with patients of color in racially charged moments, such as when patients discuss past incidents of discrimination. Workshop exercises were informed by research on the importance of mindfulness and interracial contact involving reciprocal exchanges of vulnerability and responsiveness. Twenty-five medical student and recent graduate participants were randomized to a workshop intervention or no intervention. Outcomes were measured via provider self-report and observed changes in targeted provider behaviors. Specifically, two independent, blind teams of coders assessed provider emotional rapport and responsiveness during simulated interracial patient encounters with standardized Black patients who presented specific racial challenges to participants.
RESULTS RESULTS
Greater improvements in observed emotional rapport and responsiveness (indexing fewer microaggressions), improved self-reported explicit attitudes toward minoritized groups, and improved self-reported working alliance and closeness with the Black standardized patients were observed and reported by intervention participants.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Medical providers may be more likely to exhibit bias with patients of color in specific racially charged moments during medical encounters. This small-sample pilot study suggests that interventions that directly intervene to help providers improve responding in these moments by incorporating mindfulness and interracial contact may be beneficial in reducing racial health disparities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32209082
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02004-9
pii: 10.1186/s12909-020-02004-9
pmc: PMC7092438
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

88

Références

Mt Sinai J Med. 2009 Aug;76(4):330-43
pubmed: 19642147
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Nov;15(4):332-51
pubmed: 21844287
Psychol Bull. 2019 Jan;145(1):45-78
pubmed: 30596432
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):347-54
pubmed: 16859867
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Apr;46(4):243-51
pubmed: 11932123
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Mar;50(6):813-28
pubmed: 10695979
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):600-6
pubmed: 18264834
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(1):1-9
pubmed: 20409625
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 May;25 Suppl 2:S169-77
pubmed: 20352514
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2016 Jul;19(4):528-542
pubmed: 27547105
Am Psychol. 2007 May-Jun;62(4):271-86
pubmed: 17516773
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;31(9):1189-202
pubmed: 16055639
J Health Soc Behav. 2016 Jun;57(2):168-83
pubmed: 27251890
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Jul;24(4):1014-1027
pubmed: 28008691
Am J Public Health. 2012 May;102(5):979-87
pubmed: 22420787
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May;90(5):751-83
pubmed: 16737372
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Dec;58:141-156
pubmed: 29089146
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1080-94
pubmed: 18954195
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar 1;46(2):436-440
pubmed: 20228874
Cogn Behav Pract. 2014 Feb;21(1):1-11
pubmed: 25382963
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 12;10(6):e0129478
pubmed: 26068873
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;116:161-8
pubmed: 25014268
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2018;28(4):411-449
pubmed: 30713193
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Aug;67(3):478-86
pubmed: 18508171
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Jun 20;40(9):1193-1204
pubmed: 24951636
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jan;70(1):3-9
pubmed: 18037602
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Mar;2(1):39-44
pubmed: 18985117
Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Jan;39(1):71-80
pubmed: 11013549
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jun;22(6):882-7
pubmed: 17503111
Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Oct;1(1):204-212
pubmed: 25705721
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):372-376
pubmed: 27665499
Med Educ. 2004 Feb;38(2):199-203
pubmed: 14871390
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jan-Feb;11(1):43-52
pubmed: 23319505
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):17-41
pubmed: 19586237
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1748-56
pubmed: 26129779
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 19;113(16):4296-301
pubmed: 27044069
Soc Justice Res. 2008 Sep;21(3):263-396
pubmed: 24052687
Ethn Health. 2019 Aug;24(6):589-606
pubmed: 28760002
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 5;14(2):e0211620
pubmed: 30721264
Race Soc Probl. 2014 Jun 1;6(2):181-200
pubmed: 26913088
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2016 Jul;19(4):509-527
pubmed: 27642254
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jun;87:123-31
pubmed: 23631787
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464-80
pubmed: 9654756
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 May;74(5):1238-51
pubmed: 9599440
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan;103(1):50-6
pubmed: 23153125
Behav Res Ther. 2014 Oct;61:105-21
pubmed: 25193001
Clin Psychol (New York). 2010 Mar;17(1):1-30
pubmed: 20877441
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(1):30-6
pubmed: 25547522
Health Commun. 2017 Apr;32(4):401-408
pubmed: 27309596
Behav Ther. 2016 Nov;47(6):869-885
pubmed: 27993338
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;199:219-229
pubmed: 28532892
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Dec;64(6):1152-68
pubmed: 8991302
Am J Public Health. 2004 Dec;94(12):2084-90
pubmed: 15569958
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Jun;30(4):448-66
pubmed: 20304542
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jan;51(1):1-8
pubmed: 26297851
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep;24(9):1057-64
pubmed: 19575270
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 2;139(11):907-15
pubmed: 14644893
J Couns Psychol. 2014 Jan;61(1):133-45
pubmed: 24447061
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2013 Jun;50(2):248-55
pubmed: 23066926
J Fam Psychol. 2004 Dec;18(4):589-99
pubmed: 15598164
Med Care. 2013 Feb;51(2):151-7
pubmed: 23132201
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):383-401
pubmed: 15582860
Med Teach. 2010;32(11):e467-70
pubmed: 21039087
Behav Res Ther. 2011 Jun;49(6-7):373-8
pubmed: 21492829
J Med Signals Sens. 2011 Jan;1(1):55-61
pubmed: 22606659
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD003267
pubmed: 23235595

Auteurs

Jonathan W Kanter (JW)

University of Washington, Seattle, USA. jonkan@uw.edu.

Daniel C Rosen (DC)

Bastyr University, Kenmore, USA.

Katherine E Manbeck (KE)

University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Heather M L Branstetter (HML)

Bastyr University, Kenmore, USA.

Adam M Kuczynski (AM)

University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Mariah D Corey (MD)

University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Daniel W M Maitland (DWM)

Texas A&M University Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, USA.

Monnica T Williams (MT)

University of Connecticut, Mansfield, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH