Disruption of cholinergic neurotransmission, within a cognitive challenge paradigm, is indicative of Aβ-related cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer's disease after a 27-month delay interval.
Alzheimer disease
Anticholinergic drugs
Beta-amyloid protein
Biomarkers
Cholinergic
Cognition
Early detection
Early diagnosis
Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease
Scopolamine
Journal
Alzheimer's research & therapy
ISSN: 1758-9193
Titre abrégé: Alzheimers Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101511643
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 03 2020
24 03 2020
Historique:
received:
01
05
2019
accepted:
11
03
2020
entrez:
27
3
2020
pubmed:
27
3
2020
medline:
23
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Abnormal beta-amyloid (Aβ) is associated with deleterious changes in central cholinergic tone in the very early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD), which may be unmasked by a cholinergic antagonist (J Prev Alzheimers Dis 1:1-4, 2017). Previously, we established the scopolamine challenge test (SCT) as a "cognitive stress test" screening measure to identify individuals at risk for AD (Alzheimer's & Dementia 10(2):262-7, 2014) (Neurobiol. Aging 36(10):2709-15, 2015). Here we aim to demonstrate the potential of the SCT as an indicator of cognitive change and neocortical amyloid aggregation after a 27-month follow-up interval. Older adults (N = 63, aged 55-75 years) with self-reported memory difficulties and first-degree family history of AD completed the SCT and PET amyloid imaging at baseline and were then seen for cognitive testing at 9, 18, and 27 months post-baseline. Repeat PET amyloid imaging was completed at the time of the 27-month exam. Significant differences in both cognitive performance and in Aβ neocortical burden were observed between participants who either failed vs. passed the SCT at baseline, after a 27-month follow-up period. Cognitive response to the SCT (Alzheimer's & Dementia 10(2):262-7, 2014) at baseline is related to cognitive change and PET amyloid imaging results, over the course of 27 months, in preclinical AD. The SCT may be a clinically useful screening tool to identify individuals who are more likely to both have positive evidence of amyloidosis on PET imaging and to show measurable cognitive decline over several years.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Abnormal beta-amyloid (Aβ) is associated with deleterious changes in central cholinergic tone in the very early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD), which may be unmasked by a cholinergic antagonist (J Prev Alzheimers Dis 1:1-4, 2017). Previously, we established the scopolamine challenge test (SCT) as a "cognitive stress test" screening measure to identify individuals at risk for AD (Alzheimer's & Dementia 10(2):262-7, 2014) (Neurobiol. Aging 36(10):2709-15, 2015). Here we aim to demonstrate the potential of the SCT as an indicator of cognitive change and neocortical amyloid aggregation after a 27-month follow-up interval.
METHODS
Older adults (N = 63, aged 55-75 years) with self-reported memory difficulties and first-degree family history of AD completed the SCT and PET amyloid imaging at baseline and were then seen for cognitive testing at 9, 18, and 27 months post-baseline. Repeat PET amyloid imaging was completed at the time of the 27-month exam.
RESULTS
Significant differences in both cognitive performance and in Aβ neocortical burden were observed between participants who either failed vs. passed the SCT at baseline, after a 27-month follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS
Cognitive response to the SCT (Alzheimer's & Dementia 10(2):262-7, 2014) at baseline is related to cognitive change and PET amyloid imaging results, over the course of 27 months, in preclinical AD. The SCT may be a clinically useful screening tool to identify individuals who are more likely to both have positive evidence of amyloidosis on PET imaging and to show measurable cognitive decline over several years.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32209123
doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00599-1
pii: 10.1186/s13195-020-00599-1
pmc: PMC7093953
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
31Références
BMC Psychol. 2013 Dec 23;1(1):30
pubmed: 25566378
Neurobiol Aging. 2017 Aug;56:25-32
pubmed: 28482211
Acta Neuropathol. 2013 Nov;126(5):643-57
pubmed: 24100688
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 Jan 23;6:143-151
pubmed: 28239639
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 May 18;8:111-126
pubmed: 28603768
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Jul;20(7):1685-95
pubmed: 19889714
Biomark Med. 2010 Feb;4(1):3-14
pubmed: 20383319
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Mar;36(3):1231-8
pubmed: 25585532
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016 Dec 18;5:15-22
pubmed: 28054024
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 Jun 09;8:156-164
pubmed: 28761926
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Sep;13(9):1004-1012
pubmed: 28253478
Acta Neuropathol. 1997 Feb;93(2):146-53
pubmed: 9039461
Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Mar;10(2):262-7
pubmed: 24698030
Alzheimers Dement. 2005 Oct;1(2):126-35
pubmed: 19595845
Neurobiol Aging. 2013 Apr;34(4):1210-20
pubmed: 23158764
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Feb;30(2):296-300
pubmed: 12552349
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Jul 1;74(7):830-838
pubmed: 28558099
Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Jan;12(1):60-4
pubmed: 26710325
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43
pubmed: 7726811
JAMA. 2011 Jan 19;305(3):275-83
pubmed: 21245183
Neurobiol Aging. 2010 Aug;31(8):1275-83
pubmed: 20472326
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;21(3):272-8
pubmed: 23395194
Neurology. 2010 Jan 19;74(3):201-9
pubmed: 20042704
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Jul 26;1(3):358-67
pubmed: 27239516
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Dec 12;2:19-26
pubmed: 27239532
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jul;23(5):425-36
pubmed: 18421801
Neuropsychology. 2015 Nov;29(6):940-8
pubmed: 26011114
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2000 Apr;59(4):308-13
pubmed: 10759186
Neurology. 2017 Nov 14;89(20):2031-2038
pubmed: 29046362
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 Mar 06;6:201-209
pubmed: 28349119
Int Psychogeriatr. 1992 Fall;4(2):165-76
pubmed: 1477304
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Oct;36(10):2709-15
pubmed: 26233262
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 Feb 24;6:188-195
pubmed: 28289701
EJNMMI Res. 2013 Jun 03;3(1):43
pubmed: 23731789
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;73:169-75
pubmed: 26002757