Analysis of direct and indirect genetic effects in fighting sea anemones.
Actinia equina
aggression
competition
indirect genetic effects
sea anemones
Journal
Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
ISSN: 1045-2249
Titre abrégé: Behav Ecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9426330
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
26
09
2019
revised:
05
12
2019
accepted:
19
12
2019
entrez:
27
3
2020
pubmed:
27
3
2020
medline:
27
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Theoretical models of animal contests such as the Hawk-Dove game predict that variation in fighting behavior will persist due to mixed evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS) under certain conditions. However, the genetic basis for this variation is poorly understood and a mixed ESS for fighting can be interpreted in more than one way. Specifically, we do not know whether variation in aggression within a population arises from among-individual differences in fixed strategy (determined by an individual's genotype-direct genetic effects [DGEs]), or from within-individual variation in strategy across contests. Furthermore, as suggested by developments of the original Hawk-Dove model, within-individual variation in strategy may be dependent on the phenotype and thus genotype of the opponent (indirect genetic effects-IGEs). Here we test for the effect of DGEs and IGEs during fights in the beadlet sea anemone
Identifiants
pubmed: 32210526
doi: 10.1093/beheco/arz217
pii: arz217
pmc: PMC7083097
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
540-547Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.
Références
Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9
pubmed: 22820204
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 31;7(1):10235
pubmed: 28860450
J Evol Biol. 2008 Sep;21(5):1175-88
pubmed: 18547354
Evolution. 2017 Jul;71(7):1765-1775
pubmed: 28489252
Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1352-1362
pubmed: 28568644
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 May 22;279(1735):1904-10
pubmed: 22171080
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:243-5
pubmed: 24463009
Am Nat. 1999 Mar;153(3):254-266
pubmed: 29585974
Genetics. 2007 Jan;175(1):277-88
pubmed: 17110494
Evolution. 2018 Nov;72(11):2435-2448
pubmed: 30221347
Genetics. 2011 Dec;189(4):1347-59
pubmed: 21926298
Genet Sel Evol. 2014 May 07;46:30
pubmed: 24884874
J Evol Biol. 2011 Apr;24(4):772-83
pubmed: 21288272
Evolution. 2010 Jun;64(6):1849-56
pubmed: 20100221
Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Jul;119(1):1-7
pubmed: 28295032
Am Nat. 2002 Dec;160 Suppl 6:S186-97
pubmed: 18707476
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6667-9
pubmed: 6109283
Mol Ecol. 2007 Dec;16(24):5115-39
pubmed: 17944846
Behav Ecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;31(2):540-547
pubmed: 32210526
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 25;280(1771):20131926
pubmed: 24068359
Evolution. 2010 Sep;64(9):2558-74
pubmed: 20394666
Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Nov;119(5):302-313
pubmed: 28853716
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Feb 1;13(2):64-9
pubmed: 21238202
J Exp Biol. 2018 Oct 1;221(Pt 19):
pubmed: 30115671
Am Nat. 2001 Sep;158(3):308-23
pubmed: 18707327
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 16;99(8):5744-9
pubmed: 11960030
Biol Lett. 2017 May;13(5):
pubmed: 28539458
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 7;276(1656):533-41
pubmed: 18842544
Heredity (Edinb). 2014 Jan;112(1):70-8
pubmed: 23443060
J Exp Biol. 2018 Feb 20;221(Pt 4):
pubmed: 29361588
Heredity (Edinb). 2018 Dec;121(6):631-647
pubmed: 29588510
Biol Lett. 2013 May 22;9(4):20130391
pubmed: 23697643
Evolution. 2017 May;71(5):1232-1245
pubmed: 28252800
Evolution. 2009 Jul;63(7):1796-806
pubmed: 19245394