Occupancy versus colonization-extinction models for projecting population trends at different spatial scales.

data resolution environmental driver population dynamics predictive modeling scenario spatial modeling scale

Journal

Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 18 01 2020
accepted: 03 02 2020
entrez: 27 3 2020
pubmed: 27 3 2020
medline: 27 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Understanding spatiotemporal population trends and their drivers is a key aim in population ecology. We further need to be able to predict how the dynamics and sizes of populations are affected in the long term by changing landscapes and climate. However, predictions of future population trends are sensitive to a range of modeling assumptions. Deadwood-dependent fungi are an excellent system for testing the performance of different predictive models of sessile species as these species have different rarity and spatial population dynamics, the populations are structured at different spatial scales, and they utilize distinct substrates. We tested how the projected large-scale occupancies of species with differing landscape-scale occupancies are affected over the coming century by different modeling assumptions. We compared projections based on occupancy models against colonization-extinction models, conducting the modeling at alternative spatial scales and using fine- or coarse-resolution deadwood data. We also tested effects of key explanatory variables on species occurrence and colonization-extinction dynamics. The hierarchical Bayesian models applied were fitted to an extensive repeated survey of deadwood and fungi at 174 patches. We projected higher occurrence probabilities and more positive trends using the occupancy models compared to the colonization-extinction models, with greater difference for the species with lower occupancy, colonization rate, and colonization:extinction ratio than for the species with higher estimates of these statistics. The magnitude of future increase in occupancy depended strongly on the spatial modeling scale and resource resolution. We encourage using colonization-extinction models over occupancy models, modeling the process at the finest resource-unit resolution that is utilizable by the species, and conducting projections for the same spatial scale and resource resolution at which the model fitting is conducted. Further, the models applied should include key variables driving the metapopulation dynamics, such as the availability of suitable resource units, habitat quality, and spatial connectivity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32211178
doi: 10.1002/ece3.6124
pii: ECE36124
pmc: PMC7083660
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

3079-3089

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no competing interests to report.

Références

Theor Popul Biol. 2002 May;61(3):285-95
pubmed: 12027615
Ambio. 2009 Sep;38(6):309-15
pubmed: 19860154
Ecology. 2015 Jan;96(1):16-23
pubmed: 26236885
Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 20;7(1):368-378
pubmed: 28070299
Ecol Lett. 2013 May;16 Suppl 1:4-16
pubmed: 23351093
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 02;280(1771):20131452
pubmed: 24089332
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Nov;22(11):583-92
pubmed: 17981360
Ecol Lett. 2013 Dec;16(12):1424-35
pubmed: 24134332
J Theor Biol. 2002 Aug 7;217(3):351-68
pubmed: 12270279
Biol Lett. 2014 Dec;10(12):20140698
pubmed: 25540151
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3049-67
pubmed: 19630097

Auteurs

Jenni Nordén (J)

Norwegian Institute for Nature Research Oslo Norway.

Philip J Harrison (PJ)

Artdatabanken Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Uppsala Sweden.
Present address: Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden.

Louise Mair (L)

Artdatabanken Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Uppsala Sweden.
Present address: School of Natural and Environmental Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK.

Juha Siitonen (J)

Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) Helsinki Finland.

Anders Lundström (A)

Department of Forest Resource Management Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Umeå Sweden.

Oskar Kindvall (O)

Calluna AB Göteborg Sweden.

Tord Snäll (T)

Artdatabanken Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Uppsala Sweden.

Classifications MeSH