Photogrammetry vs CT Scan: Evaluation of Accuracy of a Low-Cost Three-Dimensional Acquisition Method for Forensic Facial Approximation.
CT scan
forensic anthropology
forensic facial approximation
photogrammetry
structure from motion (SfM)
three-dimensional acquisition method
Journal
Journal of forensic sciences
ISSN: 1556-4029
Titre abrégé: J Forensic Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375370
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
15
12
2019
revised:
28
02
2020
revised:
20
02
2020
accepted:
03
03
2020
pubmed:
28
3
2020
medline:
26
1
2021
entrez:
28
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Photogrammetry is a three-dimensional acquisition method potentially applicable to the forensic field. This possibility requires the verification of its accuracy. In this study, 3D volumes of skulls are generated to compare the photogrammetry versus the CT scan. In order to provide eligible material to the photogrammetric software, photographs were captured at a distance of 30 cm from the skull placed on a support 1 m in height and illuminated with diffused laboratory ceiling artificial light. A Nikon Coolpix P7100 camera was used. Photographs capture common elements with the previous and the next photograph so as to allow the photogrammetric software to recognize these common points between photographs and create a 3D puzzle. The Zephyr Lite (3DFlow©) software was employed to register the 3D volume. CT-based skulls are taken as a metric reference. The photogrammetry-based skulls are then enlarged according to the measurements of some landmarks or Zygion and Zygion, the distance between end of nasal and base of nasal pyramid for frontal projection, and minimum breadth of the mandibular ramus for the right lateral projection. The accuracy of the photogrammetry is compared to that of the CT scan by measuring the 3D volumes of the skulls studied. Specific landmarks are used as reference points for the measures in both frontal and lateral views. Bland-Altman graph shows homogeneity. The mean difference (1.28 mm) indicates that the measurements taken on the photogrammetry-based skull tend to slightly overestimate compared with the measurements taken on the CT-based skull.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32216148
doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14319
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1260-1265Informations de copyright
© 2020 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.
Références
Sheppard K, Cassella JP, Fieldhouse S. A comparative study of photogrammetric methods using panoramic photography in a forensic context. Forensic Sci Int 2017;273:29-38.
Brüschweiler W, Braun M, Dirnhofer R, Thali MJ. Analysis of patterned injuries and injury-causing instruments with forensic 3D/CAD supported photogrammetry (FPHG): an instruction manual for the documentation process. Forensic Sci Int 2003;132(2):130-8.
Villa C. Forensic 3D documentation of skin injuries. Int J Legal Med 2017;131(3):751-9.
Westoby MJ, Brasington J, Glasser NF, Hambrey MJ, Reynolds JM. Structure-from-motion photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 2012;179:300-14.
Grussenmeyer P, Hanke K, Streilein A. Architectural photogrammetry. In: Kasser M, Egels Y, editors. Digital photogrammetry. London: CRC Press, 2002;300-39.
Kucukkaya AG. Photogrammetry and remote sensing in archeology. J Quant Spectrosc Ra 2004;88(1-3):83-8.
Larsen PK, Simonsen EB, Lynnerup N. Gait analysis in forensic medicine. J Forensic Sci 2008;53(5):1149-53.
Du XG, Jin XL, Zhang XY, Shen J, Hou XY. Geometry features measurement of traffic accident for reconstruction based on close-range photogrammetry. Adv Eng Softw 2009;40(7):497-505.
Heike CL, Upson K, Stuhaug E, Weinberg SM. 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: a practical guide to facial image acquisition. Head Face Med 2010;6:18.
Xu YF, Sun J, Carter RR, Bogie KM. Personalized prediction of chronic wound healing: an exponential mixed effects model using stereophotogrammetric measurement. J Tissue Viability 2014;23(2):48-59.
Rottgers SA, Lim SY, Hall AM, Zurakowski D, Mulliken JB. Longitudinal photogrammetric analysis of the columellar-labial angle following primary repair of bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139(5):1190-9.
Barbero-García I, Lerma JL, Marqués-Mateu Á, Miranda P. Low-cost smartphone-based photogrammetry for the analysis of cranial deformation in infants. World Neurosurg 2017;102:545-54.
D'Amico M, Kinel E, Roncoletta P. Normative 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric posture and spine morphology data in young healthy adult population. PLoS ONE 2017;12(6):e0179619.
Wen YF, Wong HM, McGrath CP. A longitudinal study of facial growth of Southern Chinese in Hong Kong: comprehensive photogrammetric analyses. PLoS ONE 2017;12(10):e0186598.
Meulstee JW, Verhamme LM, Borstlap WA, Van der Heijden F, De Jong GA, Xi T, et al. A new method for three-dimensional evaluation of the cranial shape and the automatic identification of craniosynostosis using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;46(7):819-26.
Celebi AA, Kau CH, Femiano F, Bucci L, Perillo L. A three-dimensional anthropometric evaluation of facial morphology. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29(2):304-8.
Salahzadeh Z, Maroufi N, Ahmadi A, Behtash H, Razmjoo A, Gohari M, et al. Assessment of forward head posture in females: observational and photogrammetry methods. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2014;27(2):131-9.
Toni R, Bassi E, Montaldo S, Porro A. Lorenzo Tenchini and his masks. Milan: Skira, 2017;21-7.
Wilkinson C. Facial reconstruction - anatomical art or artistic anatomy? J Anat 2010;216(2):235-50.
Chang CH, Nemrodov D, Lee ACH, Nestor A. Memory and perception-based facial image reconstruction. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):6499.
Haeusler M, Haas C, Lösch S, Moghaddam N, Villa IM, Walsh S, et al. Multidisciplinary identification of the controversial freedom fighter Jörg Jenatsch, assassinated 1639 In Chur, Switzerland. PLoS ONE 2016;11(12):e0168014.
Donato L, Toni R, Porro A, Vitale M, Barbaro F, Cecchi R. The Tenchini’s collection: a forensic anthropometric legacy of 19th century Parma. Italy. Forensic Sci Res 2019;4(1):82-7.
Sansoni G, Cattaneo C, Trebeschi M, Gibelli D, Porta D, Picozzi M. Feasibility of contactless 3d optical measurement for the analysis of bone and soft tissue lesions: new technologies and perspectives in forensic sciences. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(3):540-5.
.Bland JM, Altman DG. . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-10.
Kersten TP, Lindstaedt M.Image-based low-cost systems for automatic 3D recording and modelling of archaeological finds and objects. In: Ioannides M, Fritsch D, Leissner J, Davies R, Remondino F, Caffo R, editors. EuroMed 2012: Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol 7616. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012.
Knoops PG, Beaumont CA, Borghi A, Rodriguez-Florez N, Breakey RW, Rodgers W, et al. Comparison of three-dimensional scanner systems for craniomaxillofacial imaging. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017;70(4):441-9.
Fryer J, Chandler J. Accuracy of Autodesk 123D CATCH. Geomatics World 2013;2:28-30.
Caplova Z, Gibelli DM, Poppa P, Cummaudo M, Obertova Z, Sforza C, et al. 3D quantitative analysis of early decomposition changes of the human face. Int J Legal Med 2018;132(2):649-53.
Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D, Kociemba W, Sroka A, Kulczyk T, Żaba C, Paprzycki W, et al. Accuracy of the anthropometric measurements of skeletonized skulls with corresponding measurements of their 3d reconstructions obtained by CT scanning. Anthropol Anz 2015;72(3):293-301.
Short LJ, Khambay B, Ayoub A, Erolin C, Rynn C, Wilkinson C. Validation of a computer modelled forensic facial reconstruction technique using CT data from live subjects: a pilot study. Forensic Sci Int 2014;237:147.e1-e8.