Development of injectable chitosan/biphasic calcium phosphate bone cement and in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
3T3 Cells
Animals
Biocompatible Materials
Bone Cements
Bone Regeneration
Bone and Bones
/ pathology
Calcium Phosphates
/ chemistry
Cell Adhesion
Cell Differentiation
Cell Proliferation
Chitosan
/ chemistry
Compressive Strength
Durapatite
/ chemistry
Hydroxyapatites
In Vitro Techniques
Male
Mice
Osteoblasts
/ metabolism
Particle Size
Powders
Prospective Studies
Rabbits
X-Ray Diffraction
X-Ray Microtomography
Journal
Biomedical materials (Bristol, England)
ISSN: 1748-605X
Titre abrégé: Biomed Mater
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101285195
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 09 2020
08 09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
29
3
2020
medline:
31
8
2021
entrez:
29
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Injectable biphasic calcium phosphate bone cements (BCPCs) composed of β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) have been intensively investigated because of their high rate of biodegradation, bioactivity and osteoconductivity, which can be adjusted by changing the ratio between β-TCP and HA phases after setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of 1 wt% chitosan fiber additive with biphasic calcium phosphate as an injectable bone cement both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro evaluation of compressive strength, degradation rate, morphology, and cell and alkaline phosphatase activities was done by comparison with bone cement without β-TCP. The in vivo results for micro-CT scanning and histological examinations for three groups (control, BCPC and commercial biphasic calcium phosphate granules) were characterized and compared. After the addition of 20 wt% β-TCP to calcium phosphate cement, the initial and final setting times of the sample were 3.92 min and 11.46 min, respectively, which were not significantly different from cement without β-TCP. The degradation time of the BCPC material was longer than that of calcium phosphate cement alone. The healing process was significantly faster for BCPC than for the control and commercial product groups. Therefore, this is the first evidence that BCPC is an attractive option for bone surgery due to its faster stimulation of healing and faster degradation rate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32217815
doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab8441
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Bone Cements
0
Calcium Phosphates
0
Hydroxyapatites
0
Powders
0
beta-tricalcium phosphate
0
hydroxyapatite-beta tricalcium phosphate
0
Chitosan
9012-76-4
Durapatite
91D9GV0Z28
calcium phosphate
97Z1WI3NDX
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM