Evidence That Nurses Need to Participate in Diagnosis: Lessons From Malpractice Claims.
Journal
Journal of patient safety
ISSN: 1549-8425
Titre abrégé: J Patient Saf
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101233393
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2021
01 12 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
29
3
2020
medline:
19
2
2022
entrez:
29
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is a pressing need for nurses to contribute as equals to the diagnostic process. The purpose of this article is twofold: (a) to describe the contributing factors in diagnosis-related and failure-to-monitor malpractice claims in which nurses are named the primary responsible party and (b) to describe actions healthcare leaders can take to enhance the role of nurses in diagnosis. We conducted a review of the Controlled Risk Insurance Company Strategies' repository of malpractice claims, which contain approximately 30% of United States claims. We analyzed the malpractice claims related to diagnosis (n = 139) and physiologic monitoring (n = 647) naming nurses as the primary responsible party from 2007 to 2016. We used logistic regression to determine the association of contributing factors to likelihood of death, indemnity, and expenses incurred. Diagnosis-related cases listing communication among providers as a contributing factor were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of death (odds ratio [OR] = 3.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.50-6.03). Physiologic monitoring cases listing communication among providers as a contributing factor were associated with significantly higher likelihood of death (OR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.49-3.27), higher indemnity incurred (U.S. $86,781, 95% CI = $18,058-$175,505), and higher expenses incurred (U.S. $20,575, 95% CI = $3685-$37,465). Nurses are held legally accountable for their role in diagnosis. Raising system-wide awareness of the critical role and responsibility of nurses in the diagnostic process and enhancing nurses' knowledge and skill to fulfill those responsibilities are essential to improving diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32217927
pii: 01209203-202112000-00042
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000621
pmc: PMC7893643
mid: NIHMS1667770
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e959-e963Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR003099
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Dec;12(6):665-74
pubmed: 17100865
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Sep;26(17-18):2605-2613
pubmed: 27865003
Crit Care. 2015 May 20;19:230
pubmed: 25990249
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Oct 3;145(7):488-96
pubmed: 17015866
Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Aug 27;6(3):227-240
pubmed: 31535832
Aust Nurses J. 1981 Jul;11(1):23-6
pubmed: 6913385
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep;23(9):727-31
pubmed: 24742777
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2:ii11-ii20
pubmed: 24048914
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 15;115(6):763-70
pubmed: 25633190
Diagnosis (Berl). 2017 Nov 27;4(4):201-210
pubmed: 29536939
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 14;69(10):1353-1354
pubmed: 28279298
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1
pubmed: 22375967
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Apr;13(2):90-1
pubmed: 15069213
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2:ii21-ii27
pubmed: 23771902
ANA Publ. 1983;(G-160):i-xiv, 1-135
pubmed: 6551146
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1105-11
pubmed: 25724571
Emerg Med J. 2016 Feb;33(2):99-104
pubmed: 26362581
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jun;34(6):986-92
pubmed: 26056204
Milbank Q. 2013 Sep;91(3):459-90
pubmed: 24028696