Impact of a simulation-based induction programme in gastroscopy on trainee outcomes and learning curves.

Competency development Endoscopy training Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Gastroscopy Induction Simulation

Journal

World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy
ISSN: 1948-5190
Titre abrégé: World J Gastrointest Endosc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101532474

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 24 10 2019
revised: 21 12 2019
accepted: 23 02 2020
entrez: 29 3 2020
pubmed: 29 3 2020
medline: 29 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pre-clinical simulation-based training (SBT) in endoscopy has been shown to augment trainee performance in the short-term, but longer-term data are lacking. To assess the impact of a two-day gastroscopy induction course combining theory and SBT (Structured PRogramme of INduction and Training - SPRINT) on trainee outcomes over a 16-mo period. This prospective case-control study compared outcomes between novice SPRINT attendees and controls matched from a United Kingdom training database. Study outcomes comprised: (1) Unassisted D2 intubation rates; (2) Procedural discomfort scores; (3) Sedation practice; (4) Time to 200 procedures; and (5) Time to certification. Total 15 cases and 24 controls were included, with mean procedure counts of 10 and 3 ( In this pilot study, attendees of the SPRINT cohort tended to perform more procedures and achieved gastroscopy certification earlier than controls. These data support the role for wider evaluation of pre-clinical induction involving SBT.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pre-clinical simulation-based training (SBT) in endoscopy has been shown to augment trainee performance in the short-term, but longer-term data are lacking.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To assess the impact of a two-day gastroscopy induction course combining theory and SBT (Structured PRogramme of INduction and Training - SPRINT) on trainee outcomes over a 16-mo period.
METHODS METHODS
This prospective case-control study compared outcomes between novice SPRINT attendees and controls matched from a United Kingdom training database. Study outcomes comprised: (1) Unassisted D2 intubation rates; (2) Procedural discomfort scores; (3) Sedation practice; (4) Time to 200 procedures; and (5) Time to certification.
RESULTS RESULTS
Total 15 cases and 24 controls were included, with mean procedure counts of 10 and 3 (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In this pilot study, attendees of the SPRINT cohort tended to perform more procedures and achieved gastroscopy certification earlier than controls. These data support the role for wider evaluation of pre-clinical induction involving SBT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32218889
doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i3.98
pmc: PMC7085944
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

98-110

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare. Surgical Science was blinded to the results of the study.

Références

Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;10(2):93-106
pubmed: 31210174
Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):704-11
pubmed: 24253562
Endoscopy. 2018 Aug;50(8):770-778
pubmed: 29614526
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):254-60
pubmed: 22153875
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Aug;60(2):196-200
pubmed: 15278044
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct;10(4):356-363
pubmed: 31656560
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Aug;22(8):1214-9
pubmed: 17559386
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 17;8:CD008237
pubmed: 30117156
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;16(3):345-361
pubmed: 30019105
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Oct;12(10):1611-23.e4
pubmed: 24509241
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;9(3):200-207
pubmed: 30046424
Gut. 2017 Jun;66(6):1022-1033
pubmed: 26976733
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):482-492.e2
pubmed: 30076842
Endoscopy. 2002 Sep;34(9):698-702
pubmed: 12195326
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Sep;64(3):361-8
pubmed: 16923483
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jul;23(7 Pt 1):1046-50
pubmed: 18554236
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Nov;86(5):881-889
pubmed: 28366440
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 21;9(2):e89224
pubmed: 24586609
Gut. 2018 Jun;67(6):1198
pubmed: 28814483
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Jul;7(6):798-806
pubmed: 31316784
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan;2(1):35-42
pubmed: 28839580
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):105-114
pubmed: 30911922
Endoscopy. 2010 Dec;42(12):1049-56
pubmed: 20972956
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Apr;7(4):E551-E560
pubmed: 30957005

Auteurs

Keith Siau (K)

Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London NW1 4LE, United Kingdom.

James Hodson (J)

Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom.

Peter Neville (P)

Department of Gastroenterology, Cwm Taf Morgannwg Health Board, Llantrisant CF45 4SN, United Kingdom.

Jeff Turner (J)

Department of Gastroenterology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff CF14 4XW, United Kingdom.

Amanda Beale (A)

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Bristol NHSFT, Bristol BS1 3NU, United Kingdom.

Susi Green (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton BN2 5BE, United Kingdom.

Aravinth Murugananthan (A)

Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton W10 0QP, United Kingdom.

Paul Dunckley (P)

Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London NW1 4LE, United Kingdom.

Neil D Hawkes (ND)

Department of Gastroenterology, Cwm Taf Morgannwg Health Board, Llantrisant CF45 4SN, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH