Renaissance of Radiotherapy in Intestinal Lymphoma? 10-Year Efficacy and Tolerance in Multimodal Treatment of 134 Patients: Follow-up of Two German Multicenter Consecutive Prospective Phase II Trials.
Extended field
Intestinal lymphoma
Involved field
Involved site radiation therapy
Normal tissue complication probability
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
received:
13
10
2019
accepted:
20
01
2020
pubmed:
29
3
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
29
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This article reports on the long-term impact of radiotherapy adapted to stage, histology, and previous resection in a large cohort of patients with intestinal lymphoma (iL) treated with definitive or adjuvant curative-intent radiation therapy (RT) ± chemotherapy (CHOP, MCP, or COP). In two consecutive prospective study designs, 134 patients with indolent (stage IE-IIE) or aggressive (stage IE-IVE) iL were referred to 61 radiotherapeutic institutions between 1992 and 2003. Patients with indolent iL received extended field (EF) 30 Gy (+10 Gy boost in definitive treatment); patients with aggressive iL received involved field (IF) (EF) 40 Gy by means of stage-, histology-, and operation-adapted radiation fields. The patients had median age 58 years and were predominantly male (2:1). Histology showed aggressive prevalence (1.6:1), stage IE-to-stage IIE ratio of iL 1.04:1, and localized stages-to-advanced stages ratio of aggressive lymphoma 23:1. Median follow-up was in total 11.7 years: 10.0 years in the first study, GIT (GastroIntestinal-Tract) 1992, and 11.8 years in the second study, GIT 1996. Lymphoma involvement was predominantly a single intestinal lesion (82.1%). Decrease of radiation field size from EF to IF in stage I aggressive iL from GIT 1992 to GIT 1996 resulted in a nonsignificant partial reduction of chronic toxicity while maintaining comparable survival rates (5-year overall survival 87.9 vs. 86.7%, 10-year overall survival 77.4 vs. 71.5%) with nonsignificant difference in event-free survival (5-year event-free survival 82.6 vs. 86.7%, 10-year event-free survival 69.7 vs. 71.5%) and lymphoma-specific survival (5-year lymphoma-specific survival 90.1 vs. 91.9%, 10-year lymphoma-specific survival 87.6% vs. 91.9%). Comparative dose calculation of two still available indolent duodenal lymphoma computed tomography scans revealed lower radiation exposure to normal tissues from applying current standard involved site RT (ISRT) 30 Gy in both cases. RT adapted to stage, histology, and resection in multimodal treatment of iL, despite partially decreasing field size (EF to IF), achieves excellent local tumor control and survival rates. The use of modern RT technique and target volume with ISRT offers the option of further reduction of normal tissue complication probability. Although patients with intestinal lymphoma (iL) are heterogeneous according to histology and subtype, they benefit from radiotherapy. Prospective study data from 134 patients with indolent iL (stage IE-IIE) or aggressive iL (stage IE-IVE) show 100% tumor control after definitive or adjuvant curative-intent radiation therapy ± chemotherapy. Radiation treatment was applied between 1992 and 2003. Median follow-up in total was 11.7 years. No radiotherapy-associated death occurred. Relapse developed in 15.7% of the entire cohort; distant failure was more frequent than local (4:1). Normal tissue complication probability can be further improved using modern involved site radiation therapy techniques.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32219909
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0783
pmc: PMC7216456
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e816-e832Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.
Références
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Jun;123(3):431-437
pubmed: 28600084
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 May 1;11(9):3349-52
pubmed: 15867234
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Sep 15;19(18):3861-73
pubmed: 11559724
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15;62(4):1150-6
pubmed: 15990021
Haematologica. 2000 Apr;85(4):372-80
pubmed: 10756362
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep 28;19(36):6062-8
pubmed: 24106407
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi144-8
pubmed: 24078657
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2740-6
pubmed: 12860953
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug 15;13:246
pubmed: 26271948
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003 Jul;13(3):176-81
pubmed: 12903007
Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Feb;50(2):124-131
pubmed: 29301732
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 May 1;92(1):130-7
pubmed: 25863760
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30;31(5):1041-2
pubmed: 7713774
World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Oct 7;11(37):5905-9
pubmed: 16270408
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 May 1;92(1):11-31
pubmed: 25863750
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S3-9
pubmed: 20171515
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):457-63
pubmed: 24572077
Strahlenther Onkol. 1999 Dec;175(12):601-5
pubmed: 10633786
Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 Jan;188(1):97-9
pubmed: 22234506
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Sep 15;19(18):3874-83
pubmed: 11559725
Mol Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar;2(2):259-264
pubmed: 24649343
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Jun;195(6):544-557
pubmed: 30859254
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Jul;100(1):86-92
pubmed: 21664710