Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy with and without sorafenib as treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis.


Journal

Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez: 30 3 2020
pubmed: 30 3 2020
medline: 14 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, the treatment outcomes for patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remain poor. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of SBRT with and or without sorafenib for advanced HCC with PVTT.Fifty four HCC patients with PVTT treated with SBRT using the Cyberknife system was retrospectively analyzed between January 2009 and June 2016. Of these, sorafenib combined with SBRT was administered to 18 patients and SBRT alone was administered to 36 patients. SBRT was designed to target the liver tumor and tumor thrombosis, with a radiation dose of 36 to 45 Gy (median 40 Gy) given in 3 to 5 fractions.The mean follow-up period for SBRT with sorafenib and SBRT alone was 13.22 ± 10.07 months and 15.33 ± 22.01 months, respectively. The response rate was comparable in both groups. Complete response and partial response rates were 77.77% for SBRT with sorafenib and 75.00% without sorafenib (P = .43). The median progression-free survival rate was 6 months (2-11 months) versus 3 months (2-5.6 months) (P = .24) and the 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 25.7% and 15.2% versus 11.1% and 8.3% (P = .1225). The median, 1- and 2-year overall survival rates (OSR) were 12.5 months, 55.6% and 17.7% versus 7 months (5-13.5 months), 33.3% and 11.1% (P = .28), for SBRT with sorafenib versus SBRT alone groups, respectively.The result of our study shows that SBRT with sorafenib administered group resulted in a higher median, progression-free, and OSR for HCC patients with PVTT. However, the trends did not attain statistical significance. A large-scale randomized study is needed to assess the benefits of SBRT with sorafenib administration for patient with PVTT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32221093
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019660
pii: 00005792-202003270-00034
pmc: PMC7220154
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0
Sorafenib 9ZOQ3TZI87

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e19660

Références

N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 24;359(4):378-90
pubmed: 18650514
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jul 1;86(3):456-62
pubmed: 23474115
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S94-100
pubmed: 20171524
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 7;22(1):407-16
pubmed: 26755886
Oncotarget. 2017 May 16;8(20):33911-33921
pubmed: 28430610
PLoS One. 2013 May 30;8(5):e63864
pubmed: 23737955
BMC Cancer. 2012 Oct 22;12:485
pubmed: 23088517
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Feb 1;61(2):432-43
pubmed: 15667964
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 12;16:451
pubmed: 27405814
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Apr 1;88(5):1041-7
pubmed: 24661657
Radiat Oncol. 2017 May 31;12(1):92
pubmed: 28569169
Cancer Lett. 2013 Feb 1;329(1):109-17
pubmed: 23142289
Liver Int. 2017 Jan;37(1):90-100
pubmed: 27317941
Hepatology. 2011 Mar;53(3):1020-2
pubmed: 21374666
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug 28;22(32):7289-300
pubmed: 27621575
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 May 03;14:84
pubmed: 24886354
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):25-34
pubmed: 19095497
Gut Liver. 2013 Nov;7(6):696-703
pubmed: 24312711
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 1;94(3):580-7
pubmed: 26867886
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Nov 1;69(3):813-9
pubmed: 17524569
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 May 1;74(1):297-303
pubmed: 19362249
Oncologist. 2015 Dec;20(12):1417-24
pubmed: 26446238
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(50):e9249
pubmed: 29390360
J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;50(4):445-54
pubmed: 25027973
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 1;26(4):657-64
pubmed: 18172187
Cancer. 2002 Aug 1;95(3):588-95
pubmed: 12209752
Oncology. 2013;84(5):311-8
pubmed: 23615394

Auteurs

Jenny Que (J)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center.
Department of Hospital and Health Care Administration, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.

Hung-Chang Wu (HC)

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology.

Chia-Hui Lin (CH)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center.

Chung-I Huang (CI)

Department of Radiation Oncology, E-da Cancer Hospital, Kaoshiung.

Li-Ching Li (LC)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center.

Chung-Han Ho (CH)

Department of Hospital and Health Care Administration, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH