Safety of inter-hospital transfer of patients with acute ischemic stroke for evaluation of endovascular thrombectomy.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 03 2020
27 03 2020
Historique:
received:
07
01
2020
accepted:
15
03
2020
entrez:
30
3
2020
pubmed:
30
3
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Stroke networks facilitate access to endovascular treatment (EVT) for patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. In this study we aimed to determine the safety of inter-hospital transfer and included all patients with acute ischemic stroke who were transferred within our stroke network for evaluation of EVT between 06/2016 and 12/2018. Data were derived from our prospective EVT database and transfer protocols. We analyzed major complications and medical interventions associated with inter-hospital transfer. Among 615 transferred patients, 377 patients (61.3%) were transferred within our telestroke network and had transfer protocols available (median age 76 years [interquartile range, IQR 17], 190 [50.4%] male, median baseline NIHSS score 17 [IQR 8], 246 [65.3%] drip-and-ship i.v.-thrombolysis). No patient suffered from cardio-respiratory failure or required emergency intubation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the transfer. Among 343 patients who were not intubated prior departure, 35 patients (10.2%) required medical interventions during the transfer. The performance of medical interventions was associated with a lower EVT rate and higher mortality at three months. In conclusion, the transfer of acute stroke patients for evaluation of EVT was not associated with major complications and transfer-related medical interventions were required in a minority of patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32221353
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62528-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-62528-4
pmc: PMC7101346
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5655Références
Goyal, M. et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 387, 1723–1731 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X
Alberts, M. J., Range, J., Spencer, W., Cantwell, V. & Hampel, M. J. Availability of endovascular therapies for cerebrovascular disease at primary stroke centers. Interv Neuroradiol. 23, 64–68 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/1591019916678199
Choi, J. C., Hsia, R. Y. & Kim, A. S. Regional availability of mechanical embolectomy for acute ischemic stroke in California, 2009 to 2010. Stroke. 46, 762–768 (2015).
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007735
Kepplinger, J. et al. Emergency transfer of acute stroke patients within the East Saxony telemedicine stroke network: a descriptive analysis. Int J. Stroke. 9, 160–165 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/ijs.12032
Barlinn, J. et al. Acute endovascular treatment delivery to ischemic stroke patients transferred within a telestroke network: a retrospective observational study. Int J. Stroke. 12, 502–509 (2017).
doi: 10.1177/1747493016681018
Campbell, B. C. V., Donnan, G. A. & Davis, S. M. Optimizing Systems of Care for Endovascular Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke: Drip and Ship Versus Mothership. Circulation. 136, 2322–2324 (2017).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031444
Ciccone, A., Berge, E. & Fischer, U. Systematic review of organizational models for intra-arterial treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Int J. Stroke. 14, 12–22 (2019).
doi: 10.1177/1747493018806157
Ismail, M. et al. Mothership versus drip and ship for thrombectomy in patients who had an acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurointerv Surg. 1, 14–19 (2019).
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014249
Holodinsky, J. K. et al. Drip and ship versus direct to endovascular thrombectomy: The impact of treatment times on transport decision-making. Eur Stroke J. 3, 126–135 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/2396987318759362
Nikoubashman, O. et al. Transfer of stroke patients impairs eligibility for endovascular stroke treatment. J. Neuroradiol. 45, 49–53 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2017.07.006
Grotta, J. C. Interhospital transfer of stroke patients for endovascular treatment. Circulation. 139, 1578–1580 (2019).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039425
Holodinsky, J. K. et al. Modeling Stroke Patient Transport for All Patients With Suspected Large-Vessel Occlusion. JAMA Neurol. 75, 1477–1486 (2018).
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2424
Bodechtel, U. & Puetz, V. Why Telestroke networks? Rationale, implementation and results of the Stroke Eastern Saxony Network. J. Neural Transm (Vienna). 120, 43–47 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00702-013-1069-y
Puetz, V. et al. Reliability of brain CT evaluation by stroke neurologists in telemedicine. Neurology. 80, 332–338 (2013).
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f07d0
Alonso de Leciñana, M. et al. A collaborative system for endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: the Madrid Stroke Network experience. A collaborative system for endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: the Madrid Stroke Network experience. J. Neurointerv Surg. 10, 834–838 (2018).
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013504
George, B. P. et al. Trends in Interhospital Transfers and Mechanical Thrombectomy for United States Acute Ischemic Stroke Inpatients. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 28, 980–987 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.12.018
Froehler, M. T. et al. Interhospital Transfer Before Thrombectomy Is Associated With Delayed Treatment and Worse Outcome in the STRATIS Registry (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke). Circulation. 136, 2311–2321 (2017).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028920
Schlemm, E., Ebinger, M., Nolte, C. H., Endres, M. & Schlemm, L. Optimal Transport Destination for Ischemic Stroke Patients With Unknown Vessel Status: Use of Prehospital Triage Scores. Stroke. 48, 2184–2191 (2017).
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017281
Parikh, N. S. et al. Modeling the Impact of Interhospital Transfer Network Design on Stroke Outcomes in a Large City. Stroke. 49, 370–376 (2018).
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018166
Fuentes, B. et al. Futile Interhospital Transfer for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Madrid Stroke Network Experience. Stroke. 46, 2156–2161 (2015).
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009282
Shah, S. et al. Use, Temporal Trends, and Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy After Interhospital Transfer in the United States. Circulation. 139, 1568–1577 (2019).
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036509
Droogh, J. M., Smit, M., Absalom, A. R., Ligtenberg, J. J. & Zijlstra, J. G. Transferring the critically ill patient: are we there yet? Crit Care. 19, 62 (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0749-4
van Lieshout, E. J. et al. Nurses versus physician-led interhospital critical care transport: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Intensive Care Med. 42, 1146–1154 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4355-y
Leibinger, F. et al. Which Patients Require Physician-Led Inter-Hospital Transport in View of Endovascular Therapy? Cerebrovasc Dis. 48, 171–178 (2019).
doi: 10.1159/000504314
Brinjikji, W. et al. Anesthesia-Related Outcomes for Endovascular Stroke Revascularization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 48, 2784–2791 (2017).
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017786
Raming, L. et al. Duration of general anaesthesia negatively affects clinical outcome after endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke: an observational study. Front Neurol. 10, 679, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00679 (2019).
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00679
pubmed: 31297082
pmcid: 31297082
Schönenberger, S. et al. Association of General Anesthesia vs Procedural Sedation With Functional Outcome Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 322, 1283–1293 (2019).
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11455
Lawes, C. M., Bennett, D. A., Feigin, V. L. & Rodgers, A. Blood pressure and stroke: an overview of published reviews. Stroke. 35, 776–785 (2004).
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000116869.64771.5A
Powers, W. J. et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 50, e344–e418, https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 (2019).
doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211
pubmed: 31662037
pmcid: 31662037
Rinaldo, L. et al. Hospital transfer associated with increased mortality after endovascular revascularization for acute ischemic stroke. J. Neurointerv Surg. 9, 1166–1172 (2017).
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012824
Saver, J. L. et al. HERMES Collaborators. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 316, 1279–1288 (2016).
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647
Kayan, Y., Meyers, P. M., Prestigiacomo, C. J., Kan, P. & Fraser, J. F. Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. Current endovascular strategies for posterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke: report of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery Standards and Guidelines Committee. J. Neurointerv Surg. 11, 1055–1062 (2019).
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014873
van der Hoeven, E.J. et al. The Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 14, https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-200 (2013)