Segmentation of prostate and prostate zones using deep learning : A multi-MRI vendor analysis.
Convolutional neuro Network
Deep learning
Peripheral zone
Prostate segmentation
Journal
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
ISSN: 1439-099X
Titre abrégé: Strahlenther Onkol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8603469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
23
08
2019
accepted:
10
03
2020
pubmed:
30
3
2020
medline:
17
12
2020
entrez:
30
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Develop a deep-learning-based segmentation algorithm for prostate and its peripheral zone (PZ) that is reliable across multiple MRI vendors. This is a retrospective study. The dataset consisted of 550 MRIs (Siemens-330, General Electric[GE]-220). A multistream 3D convolutional neural network is used for automatic segmentation of the prostate and its PZ using T2-weighted (T2-w) MRI. Prostate and PZ were manually contoured on axial T2‑w. The network uses axial, coronal, and sagittal T2‑w series as input. The preprocessing of the input data includes bias correction, resampling, and image normalization. A dataset from two MRI vendors (Siemens and GE) is used to test the proposed network. Six different models were trained, three for the prostate and three for the PZ. Of the three, two were trained on data from each vendor separately, and a third (Combined) on the aggregate of the datasets. The Dice coefficient (DSC) is used to compare the manual and predicted segmentation. For prostate segmentation, the Combined model obtained DSCs of 0.893 ± 0.036 and 0.825 ± 0.112 (mean ± standard deviation) on Siemens and GE, respectively. For PZ, the best DSCs were from the Combined model: 0.811 ± 0.079 and 0.788 ± 0.093. While the Siemens model underperformed on the GE dataset and vice versa, the Combined model achieved robust performance on both datasets. The proposed network has a performance comparable to the interexpert variability for segmenting the prostate and its PZ. Combining images from different MRI vendors on the training of the network is of paramount importance for building a universal model for prostate and PZ segmentation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32221622
doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01607-x
pii: 10.1007/s00066-020-01607-x
pmc: PMC8418872
mid: NIHMS1736987
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
932-942Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA240139
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA189295
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA190105
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA239141
Pays : United States
Références
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2015 Mar 20;9413:
pubmed: 26798187
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 Apr;35(4):1077-89
pubmed: 26685226
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 May;35(5):1299-1312
pubmed: 26978662
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:2881-5
pubmed: 25570593
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:586-92
pubmed: 15458157
J Digit Imaging. 2016 Dec;29(6):730-736
pubmed: 27363993
Strahlenther Onkol. 2019 Feb;195(2):121-130
pubmed: 30140944
Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):2214-28
pubmed: 22482643
Med Phys. 2014 Apr;41(4):041909
pubmed: 24694140
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Aug;31(8):1638-50
pubmed: 22665505
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Nov;13(11):1687-1696
pubmed: 30088208
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2012;15(Pt 2):413-20
pubmed: 23286075
Comput Vis Image Underst. 2013 Sep 1;117(9):1051-1060
pubmed: 23997571
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14(Pt 3):288-96
pubmed: 22003711
Med Phys. 2008 Apr;35(4):1407-17
pubmed: 18491536
Med Phys. 2015 Apr;42(4):1614-24
pubmed: 25832052
Med Image Anal. 2014 Feb;18(2):359-73
pubmed: 24418598
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Aug;32(4):582-596
pubmed: 31144149
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jun;29(6):1310-20
pubmed: 20378467