The influence of storage temperature on fracture behavior of cryopreserved teeth-An in vitro study.
critical loading
cryopreservation of teeth
fracture
storage temperature
Journal
Clinical and experimental dental research
ISSN: 2057-4347
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Dent Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101692332
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
15
11
2019
revised:
17
02
2020
accepted:
23
02
2020
pubmed:
30
3
2020
medline:
24
8
2021
entrez:
30
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cryopreservation is discussed as a viable method of preserving teeth for determined autogenous tooth transplantation. Unchanged physical properties of hard tooth tissues are crucial for functional healing. Due to different thermal expansion coefficients of enamel and dentin or the crystallization process, the freezing process may lead to crack formation, which could adversely impact the long-term prognosis of the teeth. Twenty third molars (n = 20) were frozen slowly using a conservative cryopreservation protocol and stored at -80°C (group 1) and -196°C (group 2). After a storage time of 2 weeks, the samples were thawed to a temperature of +36°C and embedded in polymethyl methacrylate blocks. Cyclic loading was carried out using a spherical steel test specimen with 50,000 mechanical load cycles, followed by load to failure testing for determination of critical load. No significant difference in the first load drop could be detected during the load to failure test under different storage conditions. The values until fracture correlated very closely in contralateral tooth pairs, which emphasizes the importance of crown geometry in load to failure tests. Conclusions: Cryopreservation, specifically the storage temperature, does not appear to have a significant effect on the physical properties of tooth transplants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32222040
doi: 10.1002/cre2.283
pmc: PMC7301388
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
373-380Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Int J Oral Sci. 2010 Jun;2(2):59-65
pubmed: 20737931
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):229-37
pubmed: 23910204
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006 Jan;220(1):69-80
pubmed: 16459447
Arch Oral Biol. 2001 Jan;46(1):1-12
pubmed: 11163590
Cryobiology. 2005 Dec;51(3):322-9
pubmed: 16297377
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Feb;113(2):e5-e10
pubmed: 22669115
Cryobiology. 2010 Aug;61(1):73-8
pubmed: 20478291
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Apr;119(4):336-7
pubmed: 11298306
World J Orthod. 2004 Winter;5(4):358-64
pubmed: 15633383
Acta Biomater. 2011 May;7(5):2285-92
pubmed: 21296195
Acta Biomater. 2014 Nov;10(11):4852-4860
pubmed: 25034644
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Feb;15(1):30-2
pubmed: 3083003
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):ZC37-40
pubmed: 25386519
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jul;18(3):272-6
pubmed: 25992105
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1990 Jul;25(4):200-3, 251
pubmed: 2128231
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Feb;119(2):158-69
pubmed: 25306257
Arch Oral Biol. 2004 Aug;49(8):595-605
pubmed: 15196977
Am J Physiol. 1984 Sep;247(3 Pt 1):C125-42
pubmed: 6383068
J Dent Res. 1972 Jan-Feb;51(1):39-43
pubmed: 4500431
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2010 Jan;3(1):116-20
pubmed: 19878909
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Jun;6(3):373-380
pubmed: 32222040
Arch Oral Biol. 2004 Jan;49(1):59-69
pubmed: 14693198
J Dent Res. 2009 Mar;88(3):224-8
pubmed: 19329454
Eur J Orthod. 1990 Feb;12(1):14-24
pubmed: 2318259
World J Orthod. 2006 Spring;7(1):27-34
pubmed: 16548303
Int J Oral Surg. 1983 Dec;12(6):425-36
pubmed: 6425233
Int J Oral Surg. 1985 Aug;14(4):350-61
pubmed: 3928511
Scand J Dent Res. 1983 Apr;91(2):90-5
pubmed: 6574584
Dent Traumatol. 2014 Feb;30(1):71-5
pubmed: 23480134
Cryobiology. 2011 Jun;62(3):181-7
pubmed: 21397593
Acta Biomater. 2009 Jul;5(6):2213-21
pubmed: 19268644
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Feb;121(2):110-9; quiz 193
pubmed: 11840123
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Jul;60:438-450
pubmed: 26990072