Safety and Efficacy of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Intracoronary Thrombus: An Analysis From the Grand Drug-eluting Stent Registry.
Acute Disease
Aged
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Drug-Eluting Stents
Female
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction
/ diagnostic imaging
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Registries
Republic of Korea
Risk Factors
Thrombosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Treatment Outcome
acute myocardial infarction
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors
percutaneous coronary interventions
thrombus
Journal
Clinical therapeutics
ISSN: 1879-114X
Titre abrégé: Clin Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7706726
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
received:
07
12
2019
revised:
24
02
2020
accepted:
27
02
2020
pubmed:
1
4
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
1
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the presence of intracoronary thrombus undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. This study, performed from January 1, 2004, to November 31, 2014, at 55 centers in Korea, was based on the Grand Drug-Eluting Stent registry, which is a Korean, nationwide, multicenter, pooled registry of drug-eluting stents. The registry enrolled all-comers without any exclusion criteria except patient withdrawal of consent. A total of 1329 patients with AMI who had an overt intracoronary thrombus at the initial coronary angiography were analyzed. The efficacy end point was a 1-year major adverse cardiovascular event, defined as a composite of all death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis. The primary safety end point was any 30-day bleeding event. GPIs were associated with a significantly higher rate of any bleeding events at 30 days (0.9% vs 2.9% in the non-GPI and GPI groups, respectively; P = 0.015), whereas GPI use was the only significant independent predictor of 30-day bleeding events by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (hazard ratio = 4.76; 95% CI, 1.66-13.64; P = 0.004). Regarding the efficacy end points, no significant differences were noted according to GPI use (7.0% vs 9.0%, P = 0.287), and GPI use has no significant effect on 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio = 1.33; 95% CI, 0.82-2.15; P = 0.253). Early upstream use of GPIs should not be considered even in the presence of an intracoronary thrombotic occlusion. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03507205.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32224030
pii: S0149-2918(20)30127-2
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.02.022
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03507205']
Types de publication
Letter
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
954-958.e6Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosures The authors have indicated that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the content of this article.