Safety and Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes of Hysteroscopic Tubal Microinserts Versus Laparoscopic Proximal Tubal Occlusion or Salpingectomy for Hydrosalpinges Treatment.
Adult
Embryo Implantation
Fallopian Tube Diseases
/ complications
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Infertility, Female
/ epidemiology
Laparoscopy
/ methods
Ontario
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
/ epidemiology
Pregnancy Rate
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
Retrospective Studies
Salpingectomy
/ adverse effects
Salpingostomy
/ statistics & numerical data
Sterilization, Tubal
Treatment Outcome
fallopian tube diseases
fertilization in vitro
hysteroscopes
reproductive techniques, assisted
salpingectomy
sterilization, reproductive
Journal
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
ISSN: 1701-2163
Titre abrégé: J Obstet Gynaecol Can
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101126664
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
07
08
2019
revised:
11
11
2019
accepted:
14
11
2019
pubmed:
1
4
2020
medline:
1
7
2021
entrez:
1
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study sought to answer the following question: What are the complications and assisted reproductive technology outcomes among women with hydrosalpinges managed by hysteroscopic microinsert tubal occlusion compared with women with hydrosalpinges managed by laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion or salpingectomy? This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2009 to December 2014 at two academic, tertiary care, in vitro fertilization centres in Toronto, Ontario. All patients (n = 52) who underwent hysteroscopic tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinges were identified. Patients who proceeded with embryo transfer cycles after hysteroscopic microinsert (n = 33) were further age matched to a cohort of patients who underwent embryo transfer after laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion or salpingectomy (n = 33). Main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rate per patient and per embryo transfer cycle. Among 33 patients, there were 39 fresh and 37 frozen embryo transfer cycles in the hysteroscopic group (group A); among 33 patients in the laparoscopic group (group B), there were 42 fresh and 29 frozen embryo transfer cycles. The cumulative clinical pregnancy rate in group A and group B was similar (66.7% vs. 69.7%, respectively; P = 0.8). The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer cycle was also similar in both groups (28.9% in group A vs. 32.4% in group B; P = 0.6). There were two incidents of ectopic pregnancy in the laparoscopic group and no ectopic pregnancy in the hysteroscopic group. There were three major complications: tubo-ovarian abscess, distal migration of the coil after microinsert placement, and an acute abdomen following the hysteroscopic procedure. Pregnancy outcomes after hysteroscopic placement of a microinsert for hydrosalpinx management before embryo transfer were comparable to those following laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion or salpingectomy. However, caution is advised regarding microinsert placement for hydrosalpinges before proceeding with assisted reproductive technology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32224160
pii: S1701-2163(19)31108-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.11.065
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
779-786Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.