Food waste composting - Is it really so simple as stated in scientific literature? - A case study.

Additives Enzymatic activities Food waste Organic recycling Phytotoxicity Sustainability

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Jun 2020
Historique:
received: 28 02 2020
revised: 23 03 2020
accepted: 23 03 2020
pubmed: 1 4 2020
medline: 11 7 2020
entrez: 1 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Food waste has recently gained much worldwide interest due to its influence on the environment, economy and society. Gathering and recycling of food waste is the essential issue in the waste management and the interest in processing food waste arises mainly out of influence of the processes of food putrefaction on the environment. Composting of food waste encounters a number of technical challenges, arising weak physical structure of food waste with weak porosity, high content of water, low carbon-to-nitrogen relation and fast hydrolysis and accumulation of organic acids during composting. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the challenges facing installations intended for food waste composting, with the purpose to their optimization with use of appropriate additives. Physico-chemical, biochemical characteristics and phytotoxicity of the produced compost has been measured. Two additives (20% biochar and 20% sawdust) were chosen from experimental variants I-XII containing different additives (biochar, Devonian sand, sawdust) in diverse concentration. The use of selected additives seems to slightly increase potential of hydrogen value and carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, while decreasing electrical conductivity in comparison with control sample. The results obtained also show that the addition of biochar leads to an increase dehydrogenase, phosphatase and arylsulphatase activities and addition of sawdust has a positive effect on beta-D-glucosidase, protease, phosphatase and arylsulphatase activities. The phytotoxicity test shows that the compost made of food waste (control sample) and with addition of biochar is toxic to plants. By contrast, the addition of sawdust shows that the compost was not phytotoxic. In conclusion, the addition of additives does not provide unambiguous results in terms of the quality of the final product in all monitored parameters. Therefore, we can state that food waste was reduced and hygienized, and that the final product does not meet conditions for mature compost.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32224413
pii: S0048-9697(20)31715-0
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138202
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Soil 0
Nitrogen N762921K75

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

138202

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Stanislava Voběrková (S)

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 123, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic.

Alžbeta Maxianová (A)

Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

Nikola Schlosserová (N)

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

Dana Adamcová (D)

Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

Martina Vršanská (M)

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 123, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic.

Lukáš Richtera (L)

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 123, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic.

Milica Gagić (M)

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 123, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Central European Institute of Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic.

Jan Zloch (J)

Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

Magdalena Daria Vaverková (MD)

Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic; Institute of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02 776 Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: magda.vaverkova@uake.cz.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal
Cameroon Humans Uranium Trace Elements Environmental Monitoring

Classifications MeSH