Uptake of a preventive care consultation offered to clients of a community mental health service.
CATI, computer assisted telephone interview
Chronic disease
Mental health services
Preventive care
Risk behaviours
Journal
Preventive medicine reports
ISSN: 2211-3355
Titre abrégé: Prev Med Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101643766
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
26
08
2019
revised:
31
01
2020
accepted:
03
03
2020
entrez:
1
4
2020
pubmed:
1
4
2020
medline:
1
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Preventive care to address client chronic disease risks is not frequently provided in community mental health services. Offering clients an additional preventive care consultation has been shown to increase client receipt of such care. The ability of this approach to have a beneficial impact at the population level is however dependent on its level of acceptability and uptake among clients. No studies have previously reported these outcomes when the additional consultation is universally offered to all clients of a community mental health service. To address this evidence gap, this descriptive study was undertaken to determine community mental health clients' (1) reported acceptability, in principle, of such a model of care, (2) of those who were offered the additional consultation, the level of uptake, and (3) clinical and socio-demographic characteristics associated with uptake. Participants were clients of one community mental health service in Australia. Data were collected in 2017 by telephone interviews and study records. Data from three distinct participant sub-groups are reported. In response to a hypothetical question, 79.3% of participants (
Identifiants
pubmed: 32226731
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101076
pii: S2211-3355(20)30036-X
pii: 101076
pmc: PMC7093828
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101076Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Nov;33(11):752-61
pubmed: 23146009
JAMA. 2005 Jul 27;294(4):482-7
pubmed: 16046655
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(2):619-630
pubmed: 28466504
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 24;17:35
pubmed: 27009045
Tob Control. 2016 Jan;25(1):27-32
pubmed: 25209524
Trials. 2017 Jun 15;18(1):276
pubmed: 28619025
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;49(8):731-41
pubmed: 25698807
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 11;8(7):e017937
pubmed: 29997134
Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Sep;43(374):375-7
pubmed: 8251234
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 May 06;13:167
pubmed: 23642238
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;46(9):851-63
pubmed: 22645396
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Aug;52(6):667-74
pubmed: 27137507
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):762-70
pubmed: 25455118
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;72(4):334-41
pubmed: 25671328