Association of Sex With Severity of Coronary Artery Disease, Ischemia, and Symptom Burden in Patients With Moderate or Severe Ischemia: Secondary Analysis of the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA cardiology
ISSN: 2380-6591
Titre abrégé: JAMA Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101676033
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2020
01 07 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
1
4
2020
medline:
28
1
2021
entrez:
1
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While many features of stable ischemic heart disease vary by sex, differences in ischemia, coronary anatomy, and symptoms by sex have not been investigated among patients with moderate or severe ischemia. The enrolled ISCHEMIA trial cohort that underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) was required to have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) for randomization. To describe sex differences in stress testing, CCTA findings, and symptoms in ISCHEMIA trial participants. This secondary analysis of the multicenter ISCHEMIA randomized clinical trial analyzed baseline characteristics of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Individuals were enrolled from July 2012 to January 2018 based on local reading of moderate or severe ischemia on a stress test, after which blinded CCTA was performed in most. Core laboratories reviewed stress tests and CCTAs. Participants with no obstructive CAD or with left main CAD of 50% or greater were excluded. Those who met eligibility criteria including CCTA (if performed) were randomized to a routine invasive or a conservative management strategy (N = 5179). Angina was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Analysis began October 1, 2018. CCTA and angina assessment. Sex differences in stress test, CCTA findings, and symptom severity. Of 8518 patients enrolled, 6256 (77%) were men. Women were more likely to have no obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis in all vessels on CCTA) (353 of 1022 [34.4%] vs 378 of 3353 [11.3%]). Of individuals who were randomized, women had more angina at baseline than men (median [interquartile range] Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency score: 80 [70-100] vs 90 [70-100]). Women had less severe ischemia on stress imaging (383 of 919 [41.7%] vs 1361 of 2972 [45.9%] with severe ischemia; 386 of 919 [42.0%] vs 1215 of 2972 [40.9%] with moderate ischemia; and 150 of 919 [16.4%] vs 394 of 2972 [13.3%] with mild or no ischemia). Ischemia was similar by sex on exercise tolerance testing. Women had less extensive CAD on CCTA (205 of 568 women [36%] vs 1142 of 2418 men [47%] with 3-vessel disease; 184 of 568 women [32%] vs 754 of 2418 men [31%] with 2-vessel disease; and 178 of 568 women [31%] vs 519 of 2418 men [22%] with 1-vessel disease). Female sex was independently associated with greater angina frequency (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.76). Women in the ISCHEMIA trial had more frequent angina, independent of less extensive CAD, and less severe ischemia than men. These findings reflect inherent sex differences in the complex relationships between angina, atherosclerosis, and ischemia that may have implications for testing and treatment of patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01471522.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32227128
pii: 2764020
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0822
pmc: PMC7105951
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01471522']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
773-786Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL105565
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL105907
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL105462
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : U01 HL105561
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Jul;2(4):320-7
pubmed: 20031857
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3 Suppl):S4-S20
pubmed: 16458170
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1651-9
pubmed: 25110899
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 10;167(6):2938-43
pubmed: 22985742
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Apr;25(5):1000-9
pubmed: 7897108
Circulation. 2017 Mar 14;135(11):1075-1092
pubmed: 28289007
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun;6(6):614-22
pubmed: 23787234
JAMA. 2014 Nov 5;312(17):1754-63
pubmed: 25369489
Am Heart J. 2016 Mar;173:108-17
pubmed: 26920603
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;7(6):593-604
pubmed: 24925328
Clin Ther. 2018 Sep;40(9):1584-1590
pubmed: 30122309
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 1;107(7):980-5
pubmed: 21276585
Circulation. 1981 Aug;64(2):360-7
pubmed: 7249303
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jun;25(7):1650-5
pubmed: 7759719
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;8(11):1445-53
pubmed: 26404197
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;4(3):273-286
pubmed: 30810700
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 5;8(5):e011002
pubmed: 30813812
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Mar;5(3 Suppl):S62-72
pubmed: 22421232
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Feb;9(2 Suppl 1):S16-25
pubmed: 26908855
Am Heart J. 2006 Apr;151(4):813-9
pubmed: 16569540
Am Heart J. 2001 Nov;142(5):864-71
pubmed: 11685176
Eur Heart J. 2012 Mar;33(6):734-44
pubmed: 21911339
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2011 Feb;12(2):85-7
pubmed: 21228716
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3 Suppl):S21-9
pubmed: 16458167
Psychosom Med. 2019 Jan;81(1):57-66
pubmed: 30571661
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 6;60(19):1876-84
pubmed: 23062534
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):337-46
pubmed: 27017234
Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:124-135
pubmed: 29778671
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2015 Jul 30;8:161-166
pubmed: 28785696
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Sep 18;50(12):1161-70
pubmed: 17868808
Clin Cardiol. 1998 Mar;21(3):184-90
pubmed: 9541762