"Who generates this city"? Socialist strategy in contemporary London.
London
activism
discourse
political identities
social movements
Journal
The British journal of sociology
ISSN: 1468-4446
Titre abrégé: Br J Sociol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373126
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
21
03
2019
revised:
17
02
2020
accepted:
05
03
2020
pubmed:
1
4
2020
medline:
7
7
2021
entrez:
1
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This essay, based on a "militant ethnography" of the attempts of the small radical grassroots activist group, Our London (a pseudonym), to mobilize a collective oppositional politics through activities around an election campaign, engages critically with E. Laclau and C. Mouffe's arguments on discourse and collectivity in Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (London: Verso, 1985). I argue, on the basis of my findings, that while their model does provide insights that help describe the process of building collectivity from among disparate perspectives and identities, we need to go beyond a focus on discourse alone and consider the ways politics is shaped by material contexts. This is necessary if we are to understand the continued appeal of class politics as well as the difficulties in mobilizing collectivity in highly unequal and fragmented cities. From an activist perspective, the essay also highlights how developing a conception of collective interests and a critique of overarching systems of exploitation can be important in building political unity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32227482
doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12751
pmc: PMC8650996
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
644-657Subventions
Organisme : Arts and Humanities Research Council
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. The British Journal of Sociology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science.
Références
Br J Sociol. 2007 Dec;58(4):679-705; discussion 707-15
pubmed: 18076391
Br J Sociol. 2020 Sep;71(4):644-657
pubmed: 32227482