Application of optogenetic Amyloid-β distinguishes between metabolic and physical damages in neurodegeneration.
Alzheimer's disease
C. elegans
D. melanogaster
developmental biology
neuroscience
optogenetics
zebrafish
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 03 2020
31 03 2020
Historique:
received:
09
10
2019
accepted:
18
03
2020
pubmed:
2
4
2020
medline:
24
3
2021
entrez:
2
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The brains of Alzheimer's disease patients show a decrease in brain mass and a preponderance of extracellular Amyloid-β plaques. These plaques are formed by aggregation of polypeptides that are derived from the Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP). Amyloid-β plaques are thought to play either a direct or an indirect role in disease progression, however the exact role of aggregation and plaque formation in the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is subject to debate as the biological effects of soluble and aggregated Amyloid-β peptides are difficult to separate in vivo. To investigate the consequences of formation of Amyloid-β oligomers in living tissues, we developed a fluorescently tagged, optogenetic Amyloid-β peptide that oligomerizes rapidly in the presence of blue light. We applied this system to the crucial question of how intracellular Amyloid-β oligomers underlie the pathologies of A. We use Alzheimer's disease is a progressive condition that damages the brain over time. The cause is not clear, but a toxic molecule called Amyloid-β peptide seems to play a part. It builds up in the brains of people with Alzheimer's disease, forming hard clumps called plaques. Yet, though the plaques are a hallmark of the disease, experimental treatments designed to break them down do not seem to help. This raises the question – do Amyloid-β plaques actually cause Alzheimer's disease? Answering this question is not easy. One way to study the effect of amyloid plaques is to inject clumps of Amyloid-β peptides into model organisms. This triggers Alzheimer's-like brain damage, but it is not clear why. It remains difficult to tell the difference between the damage caused by the injected Amyloid-β peptides and the damage caused by the solid plaques that they form. For this, researchers need a way to trigger plaque formation directly inside animal brains. This would make it possible to test the effects of plaque-targeting treatments, like the drug lithium. Optogenetics is a technique that uses light to control molecules in living animals. Hsien, Kaur et al. have now used this approach to trigger plaque formation by fusing light-sensitive proteins to Amyloid-β peptides in worms, fruit flies and zebrafish. This meant that the peptides clumped together to form plaques whenever the animals were exposed to blue light. This revealed that, while both the Amyloid-β peptides and the plaques caused damage, the plaques were much more toxic. They damaged cell metabolism and caused tissue loss that resembled late Alzheimer's disease in humans. To find out whether it was possible to test Alzheimer's treatments in these animals, Hsien, Kaur et al. treated them with the drug, lithium. This increased their lifespan, reversing some of the damage caused by the plaques. Alzheimer's disease affects more than 46.8 million people worldwide and is the sixth leading cause of death in the USA. But, despite over 50 years of research, there is no cure. This new plaque-formation technique allows researchers to study the effects of amyloid plaques in living animals, providing a new way to test Alzheimer's treatments. This could be of particular help in studies of experimental drugs that aim to reduce plaque formation.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Alzheimer's disease is a progressive condition that damages the brain over time. The cause is not clear, but a toxic molecule called Amyloid-β peptide seems to play a part. It builds up in the brains of people with Alzheimer's disease, forming hard clumps called plaques. Yet, though the plaques are a hallmark of the disease, experimental treatments designed to break them down do not seem to help. This raises the question – do Amyloid-β plaques actually cause Alzheimer's disease? Answering this question is not easy. One way to study the effect of amyloid plaques is to inject clumps of Amyloid-β peptides into model organisms. This triggers Alzheimer's-like brain damage, but it is not clear why. It remains difficult to tell the difference between the damage caused by the injected Amyloid-β peptides and the damage caused by the solid plaques that they form. For this, researchers need a way to trigger plaque formation directly inside animal brains. This would make it possible to test the effects of plaque-targeting treatments, like the drug lithium. Optogenetics is a technique that uses light to control molecules in living animals. Hsien, Kaur et al. have now used this approach to trigger plaque formation by fusing light-sensitive proteins to Amyloid-β peptides in worms, fruit flies and zebrafish. This meant that the peptides clumped together to form plaques whenever the animals were exposed to blue light. This revealed that, while both the Amyloid-β peptides and the plaques caused damage, the plaques were much more toxic. They damaged cell metabolism and caused tissue loss that resembled late Alzheimer's disease in humans. To find out whether it was possible to test Alzheimer's treatments in these animals, Hsien, Kaur et al. treated them with the drug, lithium. This increased their lifespan, reversing some of the damage caused by the plaques. Alzheimer's disease affects more than 46.8 million people worldwide and is the sixth leading cause of death in the USA. But, despite over 50 years of research, there is no cure. This new plaque-formation technique allows researchers to study the effects of amyloid plaques in living animals, providing a new way to test Alzheimer's treatments. This could be of particular help in studies of experimental drugs that aim to reduce plaque formation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32228858
doi: 10.7554/eLife.52589
pii: 52589
pmc: PMC7145416
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
Lithium
9FN79X2M3F
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Education Singapore
ID : IG17-LR001
Organisme : Ministry of Education Singapore
ID : IG18-LR001
Organisme : Ministry of Education Singapore
ID : IG17-BS101
Organisme : Ministry of Education - Singapore
ID : IG17-LR001
Organisme : Ministry of Education - Singapore
ID : IG17-BS101
Organisme : Ministry of Education - Singapore
ID : IG18-LR001
Organisme : Yale-NUS College
ID : R-607-265-225-121
Informations de copyright
© 2020, Lim et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
CL, PK, ET, VL, FZ, CK, JG, AM, NT No competing interests declared
Références
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012 Oct 8;51(41):10289-92
pubmed: 22976560
J Biol Chem. 2008 Jan 11;283(2):784-91
pubmed: 17993648
Nat Methods. 2013 Mar;10(3):249-52
pubmed: 23377377
PLoS One. 2006 Dec 20;1:e9
pubmed: 17183721
Nat Commun. 2015 Apr 22;6:6898
pubmed: 25902152
Oncotarget. 2016 Aug 30;7(35):56147-56152
pubmed: 27528229
Pharmacol Rep. 2015 Apr;67(2):195-203
pubmed: 25712639
J Dev Biol. 2017 Dec 22;6(1):
pubmed: 29615550
Science. 2018 Aug 31;361(6405):
pubmed: 30166458
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2018 Feb;125(2):177-191
pubmed: 29196815
Lakartidningen. 1989 Feb 22;86(8):599-601
pubmed: 2921903
PLoS Genet. 2017 Mar 2;13(3):e1006593
pubmed: 28253260
Genetics. 2004 Apr;166(4):1775-82
pubmed: 15126397
Dev Cell. 2015 Dec 7;35(5):646-660
pubmed: 26777292
Eur J Nutr. 2011 Aug;50(5):387-9
pubmed: 21301855
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 Jul;69(7):810-20
pubmed: 24398558
Mol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;15(3):272-85, 228
pubmed: 19621015
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011 Nov;96(4):529-43
pubmed: 21914486
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jul;8(7):499-509
pubmed: 17551515
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8455-9
pubmed: 8710892
Cell Rep. 2016 Apr 19;15(3):638-650
pubmed: 27068460
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 May 03;4:195-214
pubmed: 29955663
Mol Brain. 2011 Jan 07;4:3
pubmed: 21214928
J Cell Biol. 1996 Jul;134(1):149-63
pubmed: 8698811
Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2327-2329
pubmed: 29185425
J Biol Chem. 2008 Jan 4;283(1):350-7
pubmed: 17959600
Exp Neurol. 2017 Nov;297:36-49
pubmed: 28711506
Sci Rep. 2018 May 30;8(1):8362
pubmed: 29849035
Science. 1992 Apr 10;256(5054):184-5
pubmed: 1566067
Nature. 1996 Oct 24;383(6602):710-3
pubmed: 8878479
Mol Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;8(2):195-208
pubmed: 12610652
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Jul;21(7):941-951
pubmed: 29950669
Methods Enzymol. 2001;332:417-31
pubmed: 11305115
Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013 Sep 10;19(8):823-35
pubmed: 23249141
Biogerontology. 2017 Apr;18(2):189-200
pubmed: 28039571
Elife. 2019 Oct 15;8:
pubmed: 31610847
Development. 2001 Jun;128(11):2107-17
pubmed: 11493532
Nat Genet. 2008 Apr;40(4):476-83
pubmed: 18311141
Elife. 2017 Jul 10;6:
pubmed: 28691901
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012 Mar;18(3):219-26
pubmed: 22070642
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Apr;29(7):1335-47
pubmed: 19519625
PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27;3(2):e1703
pubmed: 18301778
WormBook. 2006 Feb 11;:1-11
pubmed: 18050451
Neuroscience. 2015 Feb 26;287:66-77
pubmed: 25536048
Geroscience. 2020 Feb 22;:
pubmed: 32088829
Dev Cell. 2017 Jan 23;40(2):185-192
pubmed: 28118601
Nature. 2000 Nov 9;408(6809):207-11
pubmed: 11089975
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35370
pubmed: 22629299
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(3):1261-1276
pubmed: 29562537
Nat Commun. 2016 May 27;7:11689
pubmed: 27229621
Neurobiol Aging. 2010 Jun;31(6):1055-8
pubmed: 18762355
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 30;7(1):16636
pubmed: 29192250
Nat Methods. 2010 Dec;7(12):973-5
pubmed: 21037589
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 22;6:33781
pubmed: 27653553
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2010 Oct 28;9(10):1286-300
pubmed: 20835487
Development. 1993 Jun;118(2):401-15
pubmed: 8223268
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 27;104(9):3312-7
pubmed: 17360644
Neurosci Res. 2009 Aug;64(4):413-20
pubmed: 19410610
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25652
pubmed: 21980518
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:389-412
pubmed: 21692661
FASEB J. 2015 Feb;29(2):623-35
pubmed: 25384422
Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Mar;11(2):147-152
pubmed: 28767185
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 24;110(52):21171-6
pubmed: 24327734
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 28;109(35):E2316-23
pubmed: 22847441
Wakayama Med Rep. 1970 Apr;14(1):29-32
pubmed: 5509591
BMJ. 2016 Nov 29;355:i6389
pubmed: 27899350
J Neurogenet. 2016 Jun;30(2):80-8
pubmed: 27328843
Subcell Biochem. 2012;65:329-52
pubmed: 23225010
Front Mol Neurosci. 2018 Aug 28;11:297
pubmed: 30210290