Painful insight vs. usable insight in schizophrenia. Do they have different influences on suicidal behavior?


Journal

Schizophrenia research
ISSN: 1573-2509
Titre abrégé: Schizophr Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8804207

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
received: 26 03 2019
revised: 16 01 2020
accepted: 21 03 2020
pubmed: 2 4 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 2 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Suicidal behavior is highly prevalent in schizophrenia. Among the risk factors, insight has been little studied and has yielded contradictory results. In addition, it has been studied neglecting relevant psychological aspects, such as beliefs about illness and coping styles. We assessed 133 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia according to ICD-10 criteria. Evaluation included sociodemographic, general clinical, psychopathological, psychological and suicidal behavior variables. Neither insight nor insight coupled with negative beliefs and/or coping styles were associated with suicidal behavior. Nevertheless, insight coupled with negative beliefs and/or coping styles was associated with greater hopelessness and depression, internalized stigma, worse control over illness and greater global severity as compared to insight coupled with positive beliefs and coping styles. Suicide attempt and suicidal ideation groups showed greater depression and hopelessness, worse global beliefs and worse control over illness, higher socio-economic level, and greater number of previous psychiatric admissions compared to the non-suicidal group. Insight coupled with negative beliefs and/or coping style was not associated with suicidal behavior. Nevertheless, it was associated with greater depression and hopelessness, both of which are firmly established risk factors for suicide in schizophrenia. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up and large samples are needed to clarify this issue. Clinicians should assess these psychological features associated with insight, both in patients with insight and in those with poor insight when promoting it.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Suicidal behavior is highly prevalent in schizophrenia. Among the risk factors, insight has been little studied and has yielded contradictory results. In addition, it has been studied neglecting relevant psychological aspects, such as beliefs about illness and coping styles.
METHOD
We assessed 133 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia according to ICD-10 criteria. Evaluation included sociodemographic, general clinical, psychopathological, psychological and suicidal behavior variables.
RESULTS
Neither insight nor insight coupled with negative beliefs and/or coping styles were associated with suicidal behavior. Nevertheless, insight coupled with negative beliefs and/or coping styles was associated with greater hopelessness and depression, internalized stigma, worse control over illness and greater global severity as compared to insight coupled with positive beliefs and coping styles. Suicide attempt and suicidal ideation groups showed greater depression and hopelessness, worse global beliefs and worse control over illness, higher socio-economic level, and greater number of previous psychiatric admissions compared to the non-suicidal group.
CONCLUSIONS
Insight coupled with negative beliefs and/or coping style was not associated with suicidal behavior. Nevertheless, it was associated with greater depression and hopelessness, both of which are firmly established risk factors for suicide in schizophrenia. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up and large samples are needed to clarify this issue. Clinicians should assess these psychological features associated with insight, both in patients with insight and in those with poor insight when promoting it.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32229261
pii: S0920-9964(20)30151-1
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.03.042
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

147-154

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors have nothing to disclose regarding financial issues and report no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Francisco J Acosta (FJ)

Service of Mental Health, General Management of Healthcare Programs, The Canary Islands Health Service, The Canary Islands, Spain; Research Network on Health Services for Chronic Conditions (REDISSEC), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain; Insular University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain. Electronic address: fjacostaartiles@hotmail.com.

Santiago Navarro (S)

Mental Health Unit of Ciudad Alta, Service of Psychiatry, Doctor Negrín University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain.

Beatriz Cabrera (B)

Mental Health Unit of Puerto, Service of Psychiatry, Doctor Negrín University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain.

Yolanda Ramallo-Fariña (Y)

Canary Foundation of Health Research (FUNCANIS), Canary Islands, Spain; Research Network on Health Services for Chronic Conditions (REDISSEC), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain.

Natalia Martínez (N)

Mental Health Unit of Ciudad Alta, Service of Psychiatry, Doctor Negrín University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH