External Validation of an MRI-Derived Radiomics Model to Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Surgery for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
machine learning
magnetic resonance imaging
prostatic neoplasms
radiomics
treatment failure
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Mar 2020
28 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
17
03
2020
revised:
21
03
2020
accepted:
26
03
2020
entrez:
2
4
2020
pubmed:
2
4
2020
medline:
2
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adjuvant radiotherapy after prostatectomy was recently challenged by early salvage radiotherapy, which highlighted the need for biomarkers to improve risk stratification. Therefore, we developed an MRI ADC map-derived radiomics model to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) and BCR-free survival (bRFS) after surgery. Our goal in this work was to externally validate this radiomics-based prediction model. A total of 195 patients with a high recurrence risk of prostate cancer (pT3-4 and/or R1 and/or Gleason's score > 7) were retrospectively included in two institutions. Patients with postoperative PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) > 0.04 ng/mL or lymph node involvement were excluded. Radiomics features were extracted from T2 and ADC delineated tumors. A total of 107 patients from Institution 1 were used to retrain the previously published model. The retrained model was then applied to 88 patients from Institution 2 for external validation. BCR predictions were evaluated using AUC (Area Under the Curve), accuracy, and bRFS using Kaplan-Meier curves. With a median follow-up of 46.3 months, 52/195 patients experienced BCR. In the retraining cohort, the clinical prediction model (combining the number of risk factors and postoperative PSA) demonstrated moderate predictive power (accuracy of 63%). The radiomics model (ADC-based SZE The recently developed MRI ADC map-based radiomics model was validated in terms of its predictive accuracy of BCR and bRFS after prostatectomy in an external cohort.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32231077
pii: cancers12040814
doi: 10.3390/cancers12040814
pmc: PMC7226108
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):956-62
pubmed: 19167731
Front Oncol. 2019 Aug 27;9:807
pubmed: 31508367
Lancet. 2012 Dec 8;380(9858):2018-27
pubmed: 23084481
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Apr;46(4):864-877
pubmed: 30535746
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):386-96
pubmed: 25484142
Eur Urol. 2007 May;51(5):1175-84
pubmed: 17240528
Eur Urol. 2013 Jun;63(6):998-1008
pubmed: 23122664
JAMA. 1999 May 5;281(17):1591-7
pubmed: 10235151
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Aug 9;:
pubmed: 28869138
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Jun;63(6):1145-56
pubmed: 26441442
Front Oncol. 2019 Nov 26;9:1313
pubmed: 31850209
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Jan 1;28(1):33-7
pubmed: 7505775
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):906-10
pubmed: 21300478
Acad Radiol. 2004 Feb;11(2):178-89
pubmed: 14974593
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1142-8
pubmed: 26749093
Biostatistics. 2007 Jan;8(1):118-27
pubmed: 16632515
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 15;167:104-120
pubmed: 29155184
Rev Urol. 2016;18(1):1-9
pubmed: 27162506
Cancer. 2011 Nov 15;117(22):5039-46
pubmed: 21647869
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):385-396
pubmed: 29908876
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):328-338
pubmed: 32154773
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Dec;48(6):1626-1636
pubmed: 29734484
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2004;7(2):152-7
pubmed: 15175664
J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):143-148
pubmed: 27418452
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):728-733
pubmed: 26497924
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629
pubmed: 27568654
Urology. 2016 Apr;90:148-52
pubmed: 26809071
Lancet. 2005 Aug 13-19;366(9485):572-8
pubmed: 16099293
JAMA. 2005 Jul 27;294(4):433-9
pubmed: 16046649
Future Oncol. 2015;11(20):2757-66
pubmed: 26367323
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 20;23(9):1962-8
pubmed: 15774789
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):243-50
pubmed: 24680359
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):749-762
pubmed: 28975929