Travel Distance Does Not Affect Outcomes in Hip Preservation Surgery: A Case for Centers of Excellence.

center of excellence distance traveled femoroacetabular impingement syndrome minimal clinically important difference

Journal

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 04 10 2019
accepted: 18 10 2019
entrez: 2 4 2020
pubmed: 2 4 2020
medline: 2 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Previous studies have evaluated the effect of distance to high-volume centers on outcomes after joint replacement. However, there is limited evidence on whether this distance has an effect on outcomes after undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). To determine whether increased distance from a patient's home to his or her primary orthopaedic clinic has an influence on the ability to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on outcome measures after surgery for FAIS. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on patients undergoing surgery for FAIS by a single surgeon from January 2012 through January 2017. A total of 692 patients were identified and split into 2 groups: driving distance of <50 miles from our institution (referral group) and driving distance of <50 miles from our institution (local group). Preoperative and 2-year postoperative scores on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living and Sport-Specific subscales, International Hip Outcome Tool-12, and modified Harris Hip Score, were assessed. Patients achieving the MCID on any included PROM were analyzed using a chi-square analysis. Logistic regression was performed to determine whether driving distance and other demographic variables of interest had an effect on achieving the MCID. Study data were analyzed using PatientIQ, a cloud-based research and analytics platform for health care. There were 647 patients who completed 2-year follow-up and were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 116 (17.9%) were identified as being ≥50 miles from their orthopaedic provider, and 531 (82.1%) were identified as having a driving distance of <50 miles. A total of 100 patients (86.2%) in the referral group reached the MCID, and 476 patients (89.6%) in the local group reached the MCID. There was no statistically significant difference in reaching the MCID on any of the included PROMs between the 2 groups ( When controlling for a number of factors including age, body mass index, and adjusted gross income, distance to a high-volume hip arthroscopic surgery center did not have an effect on postoperative outcome scores or achieving the MCID 2 years after undergoing surgery for FAIS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Previous studies have evaluated the effect of distance to high-volume centers on outcomes after joint replacement. However, there is limited evidence on whether this distance has an effect on outcomes after undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
To determine whether increased distance from a patient's home to his or her primary orthopaedic clinic has an influence on the ability to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on outcome measures after surgery for FAIS.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on patients undergoing surgery for FAIS by a single surgeon from January 2012 through January 2017. A total of 692 patients were identified and split into 2 groups: driving distance of <50 miles from our institution (referral group) and driving distance of <50 miles from our institution (local group). Preoperative and 2-year postoperative scores on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living and Sport-Specific subscales, International Hip Outcome Tool-12, and modified Harris Hip Score, were assessed. Patients achieving the MCID on any included PROM were analyzed using a chi-square analysis. Logistic regression was performed to determine whether driving distance and other demographic variables of interest had an effect on achieving the MCID. Study data were analyzed using PatientIQ, a cloud-based research and analytics platform for health care.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were 647 patients who completed 2-year follow-up and were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 116 (17.9%) were identified as being ≥50 miles from their orthopaedic provider, and 531 (82.1%) were identified as having a driving distance of <50 miles. A total of 100 patients (86.2%) in the referral group reached the MCID, and 476 patients (89.6%) in the local group reached the MCID. There was no statistically significant difference in reaching the MCID on any of the included PROMs between the 2 groups (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
When controlling for a number of factors including age, body mass index, and adjusted gross income, distance to a high-volume hip arthroscopic surgery center did not have an effect on postoperative outcome scores or achieving the MCID 2 years after undergoing surgery for FAIS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32232069
doi: 10.1177/2325967120908821
pii: 10.1177_2325967120908821
pmc: PMC7092385
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2325967120908821

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: B.U.N. has received educational support from Smith & Nephew and hospitality payments from Stryker, Wright Medical, and Zimmer Biomet. A.J.S. has received research support from Bauerfeind, has received consulting fees from Smith & Nephew, and has stock/stock options in Johnson & Johnson. S.J.N. has received research support from AlloSource, Arthrex, Athletico, DJO, Elite Orthopaedics, Linvatec, MioMed, Smith & Nephew, and Stryker; educational support from Elite Orthopaedics; consulting fees from Ossur and Stryker; and royalties from Ossur and Springer. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Références

Clin Sports Med. 2016 Jul;35(3):503-521
pubmed: 27343399
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 May;32(5):921-8
pubmed: 23650326
HSS J. 2019 Jul;15(2):103-108
pubmed: 31327939
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Nov;475(11):2669-2674
pubmed: 28801816
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jul;33(7):1273-1281
pubmed: 28456358
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 18;98(10):797-804
pubmed: 27194489
Med Care. 2014 Mar;52(3):250-7
pubmed: 24374426
Arthroscopy. 2019 Feb;35(2):461-469
pubmed: 30612761
J Neurosurg. 1993 May;78(5):726-32
pubmed: 8468603
Mayo Clin Proc. 1985 Dec;60(12):880-5
pubmed: 4068763
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):390-394
pubmed: 27659395
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):1-5
pubmed: 28844631
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jul 5;99(13):1150-1152
pubmed: 28678128
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):612-619
pubmed: 27765733
Arthrosc Tech. 2012 Nov 02;1(2):e213-7
pubmed: 23766998
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;50(19):1169-76
pubmed: 27629403
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Feb 03;10:24
pubmed: 25645576
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1284-1293
pubmed: 29337602
Arthrosc Tech. 2013 Mar 17;2(2):e89-94
pubmed: 23875156
Arthroscopy. 2006 Dec;22(12):1304-11
pubmed: 17157729
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jan;30(1):1-6
pubmed: 25282073
Med Care. 2013 Mar;51(3):238-44
pubmed: 23047126
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2634-42
pubmed: 25214529
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 May 4;98(9):707-12
pubmed: 27147682
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):552-559
pubmed: 30822125
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2601-2606
pubmed: 30067064
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 May;35(5):519-28
pubmed: 24525544
Arthroscopy. 2017 Oct;33(10):1812-1818
pubmed: 28623078
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jun;30(6):1058-61
pubmed: 25639857
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):288-296
pubmed: 29161115
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3444-3452
pubmed: 27126630
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Apr;47(5):1145-1150
pubmed: 30943086
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;45(7):1627-1632
pubmed: 28297618
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Mar 19;7(3):2325967119831758
pubmed: 30915378
Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:711-9
pubmed: 12690896
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55
pubmed: 5783851

Auteurs

Edward C Beck (EC)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Benedict U Nwachukwu (BU)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.

Elaine K Lee (EK)

PatientIQ, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Reagan Chapman (R)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Allston J Stubbs (AJ)

Investigation performed at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Matthew Gitelis (M)

PatientIQ, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Jonathan Rasio (J)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Shane J Nho (SJ)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Classifications MeSH