Patient-reported outcomes in a phase 2 study comparing atezolizumab alone or with bevacizumab vs sunitinib in previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Adult
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
B7-H1 Antigen
Bevacizumab
/ therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
/ diagnosis
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Progression-Free Survival
Prospective Studies
Sunitinib
/ therapeutic use
IMmotion150
atezolizumab
bevacizumab
immunotherapy
patient-reported outcomes
quality of life
Journal
BJU international
ISSN: 1464-410X
Titre abrégé: BJU Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100886721
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
accepted:
16
03
2020
pubmed:
2
4
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
entrez:
2
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from the IMmotion150 study. The phase 2 IMmotion150 study showed improved progression-free survival with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sunitinib in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)+ tumours and suggested activity of atezolizumab monotherapy in previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients with previously untreated mRCC were randomised to atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks (n = 103), the atezolizumab regimen plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks (n = 101), or sunitinib 50 mg orally daily (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off; n = 101). The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) were administered on days 1 and 22 of each 6-week cycle. Time to deterioration (TTD), change from baseline in MDASI core and RCC symptom severity, interference with daily life, and BFI fatigue severity and interference scores were reported for all comers. The TTD was the first ≥2-point score increase over baseline. Absolute effect size ≥0.2 suggested a clinically important difference with checkpoint inhibitor therapy vs sunitinib. Completion rates were >90% at baseline and ≥80% at most visits. Delayed TTD in core and RCC symptoms, symptom interference, fatigue, and fatigue-related interference was observed with atezolizumab (both alone and in combination) vs sunitinib. Improved TTD (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]) was more pronounced with atezolizumab monotherapy: core symptoms, 0.39 (0.22-0.71); RCC symptoms, 0.22 (0.12-0.41); and symptom interference, 0.36 (0.22-0.58). Change from baseline by visit, evaluated by the MDASI, also showed a trend favouring atezolizumab monotherapy vs sunitinib. Small sample sizes may have limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions. PROs suggested that atezolizumab alone or with bevacizumab maintained daily function compared with sunitinib. Notably, symptoms were least severe with atezolizumab alone vs sunitinib (IMmotion150; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01984242).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32233107
doi: 10.1111/bju.15058
pmc: PMC8415097
mid: NIHMS1717139
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antineoplastic Agents
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
atezolizumab
52CMI0WC3Y
Sunitinib
V99T50803M
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01984242']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
73-82Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 16;377(20):1919-1929
pubmed: 28885881
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):757-764
pubmed: 29377755
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 05;378(14):1277-1290
pubmed: 29562145
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1789-1801
pubmed: 29658430
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1103-1115
pubmed: 30779531
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):994-1003
pubmed: 27283863
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 26;376(4):354-366
pubmed: 28121507
Nat Med. 2018 Jun;24(6):749-757
pubmed: 29867230
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Sep 27;4:70
pubmed: 17005038
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2246-2254
pubmed: 27718781
Cancer. 1999 Mar 1;85(5):1186-96
pubmed: 10091805
Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 Sep;19(5):441-449.e4
pubmed: 30017645
Cancer. 2000 Oct 1;89(7):1634-46
pubmed: 11013380
Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2404-2415
pubmed: 31079938
Oncologist. 2019 Jul;24(7):e565-e573
pubmed: 30552160
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1116-1127
pubmed: 30779529
Lancet Oncol. 2015 May;16(5):522-30
pubmed: 25840693
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1824-1835
pubmed: 28891423