Bone Regeneration and Soft Tissue Enhancement Around Zygomatic Implants: Retrospective Case Series.
bone regeneration
soft tissue regeneration
zygomatic implant complications
zygomatic implants
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Mar 2020
29 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
02
03
2020
accepted:
26
03
2020
entrez:
3
4
2020
pubmed:
3
4
2020
medline:
3
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To present a case series of zygomatic implants combined with bone regeneration and soft tissue enhancement techniques to reduce the risk of biological delayed complications such as maxillary sinusitis and soft tissue recession. Zygomatic implants placed simultaneously with different bone regeneration techniques (buccal, palatal and buccal-palatal bone regeneration) and soft tissue enhancement techniques (pediculate and free connective tissue graft) were followed for at least 12 months. The following information was collected: patient age and sex, number of zygomatic implants, zygomatic implant success rate, zygomatic implant position according to classification of the Zygomatic Anatomy Guide Approach (ZAGA), sinus membrane perforation, type and outcome of the bone regeneration or the soft tissue enhancement technique, bone gain (width and length along the zygomatic implant) and keratinized buccal mucosa width, duration of follow-up, loading protocol (immediate or delayed) and biological complications (maxillary sinusitis and soft tissue recession). Thirty-one zygomatic implants placed in 19 patients were included. All implants were successful and none of the implants presented biological complications. The bone regeneration technique was successful in 30 of 31 cases with a mean palatal bone width of 3 mm, buccal bone width of 2.65 mm, palatal bone length of 6.5 mm and buccal bone length of 8.3 mm. The success rate of soft tissue enhancement was 100% and it established at least 2 mm of keratinized buccal mucosa width in all implants. Within the limitations of the present study, bone regeneration and soft tissue enhancement techniques were useful to establish more favorable conditions of the peri-implant tissues around zygomatic implants. This could prevent biological complications such as maxillary sinusitis and soft tissue recessions. Prospective and randomized controlled clinical trials with longer follow-up periods are advisable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32235372
pii: ma13071577
doi: 10.3390/ma13071577
pmc: PMC7178084
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Sep-Oct;20(5):788-92
pubmed: 16274155
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):413-20
pubmed: 16796284
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Oct;16(5):627-42
pubmed: 23464749
J Med Case Rep. 2013 Sep 10;7:223
pubmed: 24228906
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;119(2):161-163
pubmed: 29107123
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Mar;12(1):55-61
pubmed: 19076181
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(1):28-34
pubmed: 24299007
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):527-33
pubmed: 19587877
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Feb;15(1):18-22
pubmed: 15005100
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jun;17(2):81-93
pubmed: 22562293
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Sep 22;33(1):87–100
pubmed: 28938035
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(3):114-22
pubmed: 16919019
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Nov-Dec;17(6):861-5
pubmed: 12507247
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 May 01;20(3):e357-64
pubmed: 25662546
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):712-9
pubmed: 19885413
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Aug;17(4):232-6
pubmed: 3139793
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Sep;117(3 Pt 2):S1-7
pubmed: 9334782
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):366-378
pubmed: 32142574
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Nov;100(5):354-66
pubmed: 18992569
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):399-404
pubmed: 16796282
J Periodontol. 2013 Dec;84(12):1755-67
pubmed: 23451989
Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):41-58
pubmed: 25123760
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Sep;62(9 Suppl 2):22-9
pubmed: 15332178
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Nov-Dec;15(6):889-93
pubmed: 11151591
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):1233-40
pubmed: 21197502
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Oct;65(10):2033-8
pubmed: 17884535
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):421-5
pubmed: 16796285
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Nov-Dec;28(6):e376-85
pubmed: 24278953
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;74(10):1949-64
pubmed: 27422530
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29 Suppl 15:32-49
pubmed: 29498129
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):107-119
pubmed: 31923293
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011 Autumn;4(3):269-75
pubmed: 22043470
Periodontol 2000. 2008;47:162-71
pubmed: 18412580
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):769-73
pubmed: 17974111
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Jul-Aug;22(4):645-50
pubmed: 17929527
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 May;12 Suppl 1:e77-82
pubmed: 19076177
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):e21-e26
pubmed: 32142581