Health professionals and patients' perspectives on person-centred maternal and child healthcare in Burkina Faso.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
25
11
2019
accepted:
26
02
2020
entrez:
3
4
2020
pubmed:
3
4
2020
medline:
14
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The person-centred approach (PCA) is a promising avenue for care improvement. However, health professionals in Burkina Faso (hereafter referred to as caregivers) seem unprepared for taking into consideration patients' preferences and values in the context of healthcare provision. To understand the meaning attributed to PCA in the Burkina Faso context of care and to identify the challenges related to its adoption from the perspective of caregivers and women service users (hereafter referred to as patients). An ethnographic qualitative research design was used in this study. We conducted 31 semi-directed interviews with caregivers and patients from Koudougou (Burkina Faso) healthcare facilities. We also carried out direct observation of consultations. Data thematic analyses are based on the person-centred approach analysis framework. According to the caregivers and patients interviewed, the PCA in maternal and child healthcare in Burkina Faso includes the following five components used in our analytical framework: i) pregnancy follow-up consultations extend beyond examining physical health issues (biopsychosocial component), ii) healthcare professionals' mood affects the caregiver-patient relationship as well as care delivery (the healthcare professional as a person), iii) patients expect to be well received, listened to, and respected (the patient as a person), iv) healthcare professionals first acknowledge that both themselves and patients have power, rights but also responsibilities (sharing power, rights and responsibilities of professionals and patients), and v) healthcare professionals who are open to involving patients in decision-making about their care and patients asking to have a say in the organization of services (therapeutic alliance). Implementing each of these themes comes with challenges, such as i) talking about health problems in the presence of other women, especially those related to sexuality, even though they are common to parturient women (biopsychosocial component); ii) offering psychotherapy to healthcare professionals (healthcare professional as a person); iii) taking into consideration patients' cultural and linguistic differences (the patient as a person); iv) raising awareness among patients about their right to ask questions and healthcare professionals' duty to answer them (sharing power, and rights and responsibilities of professionals and patients); v) accepting the presence of birth attendants while avoiding traditional practices that are contrary to scientific recommendations (therapeutic alliance). Despite some context-specific particularities, the PCA is not new in the context of health care in Burkina Faso. However, its implementation can pose a number of challenges. There is a need to train healthcare professionals with a view to being sensitive to these particularities. This may also require organizational adjustments so as to create the physical and sociocultural environments that are conducive to taking into account the patient's perspective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32236118
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230340
pii: PONE-D-19-32736
pmc: PMC7112215
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0230340Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Reprod Health. 2014 Sep 19;11(1):71
pubmed: 25238684
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 19;14:271
pubmed: 24947822
Health Policy Plan. 2002 Mar;17(1):42-8
pubmed: 11861585
Hum Resour Health. 2006 Mar 07;4:6
pubmed: 16522213
Digit Health. 2019 Dec 1;5:2055207619892756
pubmed: 31832224
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 11;10(8):e0135621
pubmed: 26262840
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Oct;127 Suppl 1:S40-2
pubmed: 25087176
Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405
pubmed: 23480423
Reprod Health Matters. 2001 Nov;9(18):79-89
pubmed: 11765404
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:98-104
pubmed: 26560408
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Jul 1;96(7):450-461
pubmed: 29962548
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Feb;23(1):3-4
pubmed: 28239932
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Feb 06;7:7
pubmed: 19200353
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2003 Feb;51(1 Pt 1):39-54
pubmed: 12684580
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Dec;47(11):1781-95
pubmed: 9877348
BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):468-72
pubmed: 11222423
Lancet. 2006 Oct 14;368(9544):1377-86
pubmed: 17046470
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Oct;51(7):1087-110
pubmed: 11005395