Incremental Health Care Burden of Treatment-Resistant Depression Among Commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare Payers.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antidepressive Agents
/ administration & dosage
Cost of Illness
Depressive Disorder, Major
/ drug therapy
Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
/ drug therapy
Female
Health Care Costs
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Insurance, Health
/ economics
Male
Medicaid
/ economics
Medicare
/ economics
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
United States
Young Adult
Depression
Economics
Journal
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)
ISSN: 1557-9700
Titre abrégé: Psychiatr Serv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502838
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2020
01 06 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
3
4
2020
medline:
27
3
2021
entrez:
3
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study compared health care use and costs among patients with treatment-resistant versus treatment-responsive depression across Medicaid, Medicare, and commercial payers. A retrospective cohort study was conducted by using Truven Health Analytics' commercial (2006-2017; N=111,544), Medicaid (2007-2017; N=24,036), and Medicare supplemental (2006-2017; N=8,889) claims databases. Participants were adults with major depressive disorder who had received one or more antidepressant treatments. Treatment resistance was defined as failure of two or more antidepressant treatments of adequate dose and duration. Annual use (hospitalizations and outpatient and emergency department [ED] visits) and costs were compared across patients by treatment-resistant status in each payer population. Incremental burden of treatment-resistant depression was estimated with regression analyses. Monthly changes in costs during 1-year follow-up were assessed to understand differential cost trends by treatment-resistant status. In the three payer populations, patients with treatment-resistant depression incurred higher health care utilization than those with treatment-responsive depression (hospitalization, odds ratios [ORs]=1.32-1.76; ED visits, ORs=1.38-1.45; outpatient visits, incident rate ratio=1.29-1.54; p<0.001 for all). Compared with those with treatment-responsive depression, those with treatment resistance incurred higher annual costs (from $4,093 to $8,054 higher; p<0.001). Patients with treatment-resistant depression had higher costs at baseline compared with patients with treatment-responsive depression and incurred higher costs each month throughout follow-up. Treatment-resistant depression imposes a significant health care burden on insurers. Treatment-resistant depression may exist and affect health care burden before a patient is identified as having treatment-resistant depression. Findings underscore the need for effective and timely treatment of treatment-resistant depression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32237982
doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900398
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antidepressive Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
593-601Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn