Preventive healthcare uptake in private hospitals in Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey (Nisa premier hospital).


Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 15 08 2018
accepted: 18 03 2020
entrez: 3 4 2020
pubmed: 3 4 2020
medline: 18 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Understanding the features of preventive care uptake is critical for assessing the performance and viability of primary care in any healthcare system. There are gaps in previous studies that focused on primary healthcare features, challenges and way forward in Nigeria but were mainly public sector focused and do not characterize the features of preventive care. Since private healthcare sector remains the most accessed and utilized in Nigeria, this study sought to characterize the features of uptake of preventive care to better understand the current preventive healthcare landscape. A descriptive cross-sectional study, using survey questionnaire were randomly administered to adult patients attending the Family Medicine Out-Patient Department (OPD) at Nisa Premier Hospital, Jabi Abuja. The study was conducted over a three-month period. (January to June 2017). Data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 23 (IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics in the form of frequency and percentage were used to report the results. A total of 381 participants completed the survey. The results revealed that while an over overwhelming majority (> 90%) of participants indicated knowledge of benefits of preventive care, and preferred interventions aimed at preventing a disease before they occur, 48% preferred interventions aimed at reducing disease or injury impact or interventions aimed at ameliorating the impact of ongoing disease or injury with long lasting effect (43%). Unfortunately, less than 40% of respondents would visit the hospital when their health condition is not serious. Important barriers to uptake of preventive care were revealed as cost (45%), distance to the healthcare provider (36%) and lack of health insurance (33%), whereas poor education (19%), social norms (13%) as well as cultural and religious beliefs (10%) towards accessing certain health services appeared to be lesser barriers. Although people are aware of the benefits of preventive care, its uptake will greatly be enhanced through improved health insurance coverage, refocusing primary healthcare functions on preventive rather than curative care and instituting policies that mandatorily prescribe uptake for the insured, both at the individual and the insurer's level.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Understanding the features of preventive care uptake is critical for assessing the performance and viability of primary care in any healthcare system. There are gaps in previous studies that focused on primary healthcare features, challenges and way forward in Nigeria but were mainly public sector focused and do not characterize the features of preventive care. Since private healthcare sector remains the most accessed and utilized in Nigeria, this study sought to characterize the features of uptake of preventive care to better understand the current preventive healthcare landscape.
METHOD METHODS
A descriptive cross-sectional study, using survey questionnaire were randomly administered to adult patients attending the Family Medicine Out-Patient Department (OPD) at Nisa Premier Hospital, Jabi Abuja. The study was conducted over a three-month period. (January to June 2017). Data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 23 (IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics in the form of frequency and percentage were used to report the results.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 381 participants completed the survey. The results revealed that while an over overwhelming majority (> 90%) of participants indicated knowledge of benefits of preventive care, and preferred interventions aimed at preventing a disease before they occur, 48% preferred interventions aimed at reducing disease or injury impact or interventions aimed at ameliorating the impact of ongoing disease or injury with long lasting effect (43%). Unfortunately, less than 40% of respondents would visit the hospital when their health condition is not serious. Important barriers to uptake of preventive care were revealed as cost (45%), distance to the healthcare provider (36%) and lack of health insurance (33%), whereas poor education (19%), social norms (13%) as well as cultural and religious beliefs (10%) towards accessing certain health services appeared to be lesser barriers.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Although people are aware of the benefits of preventive care, its uptake will greatly be enhanced through improved health insurance coverage, refocusing primary healthcare functions on preventive rather than curative care and instituting policies that mandatorily prescribe uptake for the insured, both at the individual and the insurer's level.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32238153
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05117-5
pii: 10.1186/s12913-020-05117-5
pmc: PMC7114808
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

273

Références

N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 14;358(7):661-3
pubmed: 18272889
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(2):1-10
pubmed: 22304506
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:1-7
pubmed: 22312222
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 23;3(12):e003387
pubmed: 24366576
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Apr 15;:
pubmed: 29658152
NCHS Data Brief. 2016 May;(246):1-8
pubmed: 27227570
Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2013 Dec;11(2):87-95
pubmed: 25161426
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Dec;23(6):909-15
pubmed: 22878901
Afr Health Sci. 2014 Jun;14(2):322-33
pubmed: 25320580
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Jun 29;6(2):260-271
pubmed: 29844097
BMJ. 2013 Oct 23;347:f6360
pubmed: 24153242
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(37):e4783
pubmed: 27631229
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;44(5):1469-73
pubmed: 26071137
BMJ. 1997 Sep 20;315(7110):703-7
pubmed: 9314754
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 22;13(2):e0192973
pubmed: 29470545
Obes Rev. 2013 Nov;14 Suppl 2:141-9
pubmed: 24102989
PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001244
pubmed: 22723748

Auteurs

Joshua N T Ofoli (JNT)

Department of Family and Specialty Medicine, Nisa Premier Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.

Timi Ashau-Oladipo (T)

Department of Family and Specialty Medicine, Nisa Premier Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.

Stephen S Hati (SS)

Research and Development, Nisa Premier Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.
Center for Research, Institute of Medical Sciences Africa, Abuja, Nigeria.

Lile Ati (L)

Research and Development, Nisa Premier Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.

Victor Ede (V)

Medical Audit Department, Nisa Premier Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria. edevictor@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH