Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Target Attainment in Patients With Established Cardiovascular Disease: Analysis of Routine Care Data.
LDL-c
cardiovascular risk management
learning health care system
routine clinical data
Journal
JMIR medical informatics
ISSN: 2291-9694
Titre abrégé: JMIR Med Inform
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101645109
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Apr 2020
02 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
25
09
2019
accepted:
31
12
2019
revised:
20
12
2019
entrez:
3
4
2020
pubmed:
3
4
2020
medline:
3
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Direct feedback on quality of care is one of the key features of a learning health care system (LHS), enabling health care professionals to improve upon the routine clinical care of their patients during practice. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of routine care data extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) in order to obtain reliable information on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) management in cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients referred to a tertiary care center. We extracted all LDL-c measurements from the EHRs of patients with a history of CVD referred to the University Medical Center Utrecht. We assessed LDL-c target attainment at the time of referral and per year. In patients with multiple measurements, we analyzed LDL-c trajectories, truncated at 6 follow-up measurements. Lastly, we performed a logistic regression analysis to investigate factors associated with improvement of LDL-c at the next measurement. Between February 2003 and December 2017, 250,749 LDL-c measurements were taken from 95,795 patients, of whom 23,932 had a history of CVD. At the time of referral, 51% of patients had not reached their LDL-c target. A large proportion of patients (55%) had no follow-up LDL-c measurements. Most of the patients with repeated measurements showed no change in LDL-c levels over time: the transition probability to remain in the same category was up to 0.84. Sequence clustering analysis showed more women (odds ratio 1.18, 95% CI 1.07-1.10) in the cluster with both most measurements off target and the most LDL-c measurements furthest from the target. Timing of drug prescription was difficult to determine from our data, limiting the interpretation of results regarding medication management. Routine care data can be used to provide feedback on quality of care, such as LDL-c target attainment. These routine care data show high off-target prevalence and little change in LDL-c over time. Registrations of diagnosis; follow-up trajectory, including primary and secondary care; and medication use need to be improved in order to enhance usability of the EHR system for adequate feedback.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Direct feedback on quality of care is one of the key features of a learning health care system (LHS), enabling health care professionals to improve upon the routine clinical care of their patients during practice.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the potential of routine care data extracted from electronic health records (EHRs) in order to obtain reliable information on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) management in cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients referred to a tertiary care center.
METHODS
METHODS
We extracted all LDL-c measurements from the EHRs of patients with a history of CVD referred to the University Medical Center Utrecht. We assessed LDL-c target attainment at the time of referral and per year. In patients with multiple measurements, we analyzed LDL-c trajectories, truncated at 6 follow-up measurements. Lastly, we performed a logistic regression analysis to investigate factors associated with improvement of LDL-c at the next measurement.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Between February 2003 and December 2017, 250,749 LDL-c measurements were taken from 95,795 patients, of whom 23,932 had a history of CVD. At the time of referral, 51% of patients had not reached their LDL-c target. A large proportion of patients (55%) had no follow-up LDL-c measurements. Most of the patients with repeated measurements showed no change in LDL-c levels over time: the transition probability to remain in the same category was up to 0.84. Sequence clustering analysis showed more women (odds ratio 1.18, 95% CI 1.07-1.10) in the cluster with both most measurements off target and the most LDL-c measurements furthest from the target. Timing of drug prescription was difficult to determine from our data, limiting the interpretation of results regarding medication management.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Routine care data can be used to provide feedback on quality of care, such as LDL-c target attainment. These routine care data show high off-target prevalence and little change in LDL-c over time. Registrations of diagnosis; follow-up trajectory, including primary and secondary care; and medication use need to be improved in order to enhance usability of the EHR system for adequate feedback.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32238333
pii: v8i4e16400
doi: 10.2196/16400
pmc: PMC7163416
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e16400Informations de copyright
©T Katrien J Groenhof, Daniel Kofink, Michiel L Bots, Hendrik M Nathoe, Imo E Hoefer, Wouter W Van Solinge, A Titia Lely, Folkert W Asselbergs, Saskia Haitjema. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 02.04.2020.
Références
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(1):13-9
pubmed: 17243908
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 26;70(13):1543-1554
pubmed: 28935030
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 May;24(8):840-847
pubmed: 28128643
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Jun;24(3_suppl):14-21
pubmed: 28618902
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):59-67
pubmed: 28480477
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Jul;21(7):813-22
pubmed: 23147276
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):108
pubmed: 31182084
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Nov 15;165(10):713-722
pubmed: 27618509
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 19;21(3):e11732
pubmed: 30888324
Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2315-2381
pubmed: 27222591
Clin Chem. 1972 Jun;18(6):499-502
pubmed: 4337382
Neth Heart J. 2019 Sep;27(9):435-442
pubmed: 31372838
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Dec;64:87-92
pubmed: 27693565
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Apr;23(6):636-48
pubmed: 25687109
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Dec;25(18):1947-1949
pubmed: 30335509
BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):765
pubmed: 15767266