Optimizing Text Messages to Promote Engagement With Internet Smoking Cessation Treatment: Results From a Factorial Screening Experiment.
internet
smoking cessation
text messaging
tobacco dependence
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 04 2020
02 04 2020
Historique:
received:
12
01
2020
accepted:
22
02
2020
revised:
09
02
2020
entrez:
3
4
2020
pubmed:
3
4
2020
medline:
3
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Smoking remains a leading cause of preventable death and illness. Internet interventions for smoking cessation have the potential to significantly impact public health, given their broad reach and proven effectiveness. Given the dose-response association between engagement and behavior change, identifying strategies to promote engagement is a priority across digital health interventions. Text messaging is a proven smoking cessation treatment modality and a powerful strategy to increase intervention engagement in other areas of health, but it has not been tested as an engagement strategy for a digital cessation intervention. This study examined the impact of 4 experimental text message design factors on adult smokers' engagement with an internet smoking cessation program. We conducted a 2×2×2×2 full factorial screening experiment wherein 864 participants were randomized to 1 of 16 experimental conditions after registering with a free internet smoking cessation program and enrolling in its automated text message program. Experimental factors were personalization (on/off), integration between the web and text message platforms (on/off), dynamic tailoring of intervention content based on user engagement (on/off), and message intensity (tapered vs abrupt drop-off). Primary outcomes were 3-month measures of engagement (ie, page views, time on site, and return visits to the website) as well as use of 6 interactive features of the internet program. All metrics were automatically tracked; there were no missing data. Main effects were detected for integration and dynamic tailoring. Integration significantly increased interactive feature use by participants, whereas dynamic tailoring increased the number of features used and page views. No main effects were found for message intensity or personalization alone, although several synergistic interactions with other experimental features were observed. Synergistic effects, when all experimental factors were active, resulted in the highest rates of interactive feature use and the greatest proportion of participants at high levels of engagement. Measured in terms of standardized mean differences (SMDs), effects on interactive feature use were highest for Build Support System (SMD 0.56; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.81), Choose Quit Smoking Aid (SMD 0.38; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.66), and Track Smoking Triggers (SMD 0.33; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.61). Among the engagement metrics, the largest effects were on overall feature utilization (SMD 0.33; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.59) and time on site (SMD 0.29; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.57). As no SMD >0.30 was observed for main effects on any outcome, results suggest that for some outcomes, the combined intervention was stronger than individual factors alone. This factorial experiment demonstrates the effectiveness of text messaging as a strategy to increase engagement with an internet smoking cessation intervention, resulting in greater overall intervention dose and greater exposure to the core components of tobacco dependence treatment that can promote abstinence. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02585206; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02585206. RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010687.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Smoking remains a leading cause of preventable death and illness. Internet interventions for smoking cessation have the potential to significantly impact public health, given their broad reach and proven effectiveness. Given the dose-response association between engagement and behavior change, identifying strategies to promote engagement is a priority across digital health interventions. Text messaging is a proven smoking cessation treatment modality and a powerful strategy to increase intervention engagement in other areas of health, but it has not been tested as an engagement strategy for a digital cessation intervention.
OBJECTIVE
This study examined the impact of 4 experimental text message design factors on adult smokers' engagement with an internet smoking cessation program.
METHODS
We conducted a 2×2×2×2 full factorial screening experiment wherein 864 participants were randomized to 1 of 16 experimental conditions after registering with a free internet smoking cessation program and enrolling in its automated text message program. Experimental factors were personalization (on/off), integration between the web and text message platforms (on/off), dynamic tailoring of intervention content based on user engagement (on/off), and message intensity (tapered vs abrupt drop-off). Primary outcomes were 3-month measures of engagement (ie, page views, time on site, and return visits to the website) as well as use of 6 interactive features of the internet program. All metrics were automatically tracked; there were no missing data.
RESULTS
Main effects were detected for integration and dynamic tailoring. Integration significantly increased interactive feature use by participants, whereas dynamic tailoring increased the number of features used and page views. No main effects were found for message intensity or personalization alone, although several synergistic interactions with other experimental features were observed. Synergistic effects, when all experimental factors were active, resulted in the highest rates of interactive feature use and the greatest proportion of participants at high levels of engagement. Measured in terms of standardized mean differences (SMDs), effects on interactive feature use were highest for Build Support System (SMD 0.56; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.81), Choose Quit Smoking Aid (SMD 0.38; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.66), and Track Smoking Triggers (SMD 0.33; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.61). Among the engagement metrics, the largest effects were on overall feature utilization (SMD 0.33; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.59) and time on site (SMD 0.29; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.57). As no SMD >0.30 was observed for main effects on any outcome, results suggest that for some outcomes, the combined intervention was stronger than individual factors alone.
CONCLUSIONS
This factorial experiment demonstrates the effectiveness of text messaging as a strategy to increase engagement with an internet smoking cessation intervention, resulting in greater overall intervention dose and greater exposure to the core components of tobacco dependence treatment that can promote abstinence.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02585206; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02585206.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010687.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32238338
pii: v22i4e17734
doi: 10.2196/17734
pmc: PMC7386536
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02585206']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e17734Subventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA038139
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
©Amanda L L Graham, George D Papandonatos, Megan A Jacobs, Michael S Amato, Sarah Cha, Amy M Cohn, Lorien C Abroms, Robyn Whittaker. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.04.2020.
Références
Health Educ Res. 2005 Oct;20(5):527-39
pubmed: 15701665
Comput Inform Nurs. 2011 Feb;29(2 Suppl):TC9-20
pubmed: 21372645
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):673-93
pubmed: 17592961
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jul 16;15(7):e146
pubmed: 23859884
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Aug;16(8):1129-39
pubmed: 24727369
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Feb 17;12(1):e4
pubmed: 20164043
Addiction. 2016 Jan;111(1):117-28
pubmed: 26582140
Health Psychol. 2005 Mar;24(2):179-88
pubmed: 15755232
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;40(1):59-62
pubmed: 16403040
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 30;6(3):e010687
pubmed: 27029775
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):546-557
pubmed: 27379777
Addiction. 2008 Oct;103(10):1706-12
pubmed: 18715238
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0183655
pubmed: 28832621
Am Psychol. 2005 Feb-Mar;60(2):170-80
pubmed: 15740449
Ann Behav Med. 2018 Mar 15;52(4):331-341
pubmed: 29878062
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 25;15(3):e69
pubmed: 23529377
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 08;18(1):e6
pubmed: 26747176
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr 17;7:55
pubmed: 17439645
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2016 Jul;42(4):450-8
pubmed: 27120396
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;97:41-8
pubmed: 24161087
Br J Health Psychol. 2012 Feb;17(1):60-73
pubmed: 22106987
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):254-267
pubmed: 27966189
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jan 28;15(1):e14
pubmed: 23353649
Lancet. 2011 Jul 2;378(9785):49-55
pubmed: 21722952
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 06;13(1):e2
pubmed: 21212045
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Apr 16;10(2):e10
pubmed: 18417443
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11
pubmed: 15829473
Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S112-8
pubmed: 17466815
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:393-415
pubmed: 25785892
Digit Health. 2018 Feb 1;4:2055207617743354
pubmed: 29942622
Tob Control. 2017 Nov;26(6):683-689
pubmed: 27852892
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Apr 28;4(2):e47
pubmed: 25921274
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 4;21(2):249-252
pubmed: 29660037
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):833-842
pubmed: 27745683
J Med Internet Res. 2009 May 14;11(2):e16
pubmed: 19632970
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):816-820
pubmed: 28070778
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 04;9:CD007078
pubmed: 28869775
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):324-332
pubmed: 27836982
Ann Behav Med. 2005 Aug;30(1):65-73
pubmed: 16097907
Internet Interv. 2016 Jul 07;5:23-29
pubmed: 30135803
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 22;10:CD006611
pubmed: 31638271