Willingness to donate genomic and other medical data: results from Germany.


Journal

European journal of human genetics : EJHG
ISSN: 1476-5438
Titre abrégé: Eur J Hum Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9302235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 08 10 2019
accepted: 25 02 2020
revised: 17 02 2020
pubmed: 3 4 2020
medline: 2 6 2021
entrez: 3 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This paper reports findings from Germany-based participants in the "Your DNA, Your Say" study, a collaborative effort among researchers in more than 20 countries across the world to explore public attitudes, values and opinions towards willingness to donate genomic and other personal data for use by others. Based on a representative sample of German residents (n = 1506) who completed the German-language version of the survey, we found that views of genetic exceptionalism were less prevalent in the German-language arm of the study than in the English-language arm (43% versus 52%). Also, people's willingness to make their data available for research was lower in the German than in the English-language samples of the study (56% versus 67%). In the German sample, those who were more familiar with genetics, and those holding views of genetic exceptionalism were more likely to be willing to donate data than others. We explain these findings with reference to the important role that the "right of informational self-determination" plays in German public discourse. Rather than being a particularly strict interpretation of privacy in the sense of a right to be left alone, the German understanding of informational self-determination bestows on each citizen the responsibility to carefully consider how their personal data should be used to protect important rights and to serve the public good.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32238912
doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0611-2
pii: 10.1038/s41431-020-0611-2
pmc: PMC7381614
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1000-1009

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

DeFrancesco L, Jarchum I. Focus on wearable sensors. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;4:329.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0110-6
Tempini N, Leonelli S. Genomics and big data in biomedicine. In: Gibbon S, Prainsack P, Hilgartner S, Lamoreaux J, editors. Routledge Handbook of Genomics, Health and Society, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2018. p. 24–31.
Fiske A, Buyx A, Prainsack B. Health information counselors: a new profession for the age of big data. Acad Med. 2019;1:37.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002395
Neff G. Why big data won’t cure us. Big Data. 2013;3:117–23.
doi: 10.1089/big.2013.0029
Weber GM, Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Finding the missing link for big biomedical data. J Am Med Assoc. 2014;24:2479–80.
Middleton A, Milne R, Thorogood A, Kleiderman E, Niemiec E, Prainsack B, et al. Attitudes of publics who are unwilling to donate DNA data for research. Eur J Med Genet. 2019;5:316–23.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.014
Middleton A, Milne R, Howard H, Niemiec E, Robarts L, Critchley C, et al. Members of the public in the USA, UK, Canada and Australia expressing genetic exceptionalism say they are more willing to donate genomic data. Eur Hum J Genet. 2020;28:424–34.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0550-y
Schiermeier Q. Germans mix support and scepticism for genetic engineering. Nature. 1998;393:299.
doi: 10.1038/30581
Balck F, Berth H, Meyer W. Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers. Genet Test Mol Biomark. 2009;6:743–50.
doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2008.0154
Hobbs A, Starkbaum J, Gottweis U, Wichmann HE, Gottweis H. The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies. Public Health Genom. 2012;5:272–84.
doi: 10.1159/000336671
Richter G, Krawczak M, Lieb W, Wolff L, Schreiber S, Buyx A. Broad consent for health care–embedded biobanking: understanding and reasons to donate in a large patient sample. Genet Med. 2018;20:76–82.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.82
Richter G, Borzikowsky C, Lieb W, Schreiber S, Krawczak M, Buyx A. Patient views on research use of clinical data without consent: legal, but also acceptable? Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27:841–7.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0340-6
Bossert S, Kahrass H, Strech D. The public’s awareness of and attitude toward research biobanks—a Regional German Survey. Front Genet. 2019;9:190.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00190
Middleton A. Society and personal genome data. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27:R8–R13.
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy084
Middleton A, Niemiec E, Prainsack B, Bobe J, Farley L, Steed C, et al. “Your DNA, Your Say”: global survey gathering attitudes toward genomics: design, delivery and methods. Pers Med. 2018;15:311–8.
doi: 10.2217/pme-2018-0032
European Commission. Europeans and biotechnology in 2010. Winds of change? 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_341_winds_en.pdf . Accessed 02 Oct 2019.
European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 431—“Data protection”; 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_431_en.pdf . Accessed 02 Oct 2019.
Hornung G, Schnabel C. Data protection in Germany I: the population census decision and the right to informational self-determination. Comput Law Secur Rev. 2009;1:84–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2008.11.002
German Federal Constitutional Court, Judgement of the First Senate of 15 Dezember 1983 - 1 BvR 209/83 -, Rn. (1-215). http://www.bverfg.de/e/rs19831215_1bvr020983.html . Accessed 2020-03-29.
Vezyridis P, Timmons S. Resisting big data exploitations in public healthcare: free riding or distributive justice? Socio Health Illn. 2019;8:1585–99.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12969
Vogel G. German law allows use of DNA to predict suspects’ look. Science. 2018;6391:841–2.
doi: 10.1126/science.360.6391.841

Auteurs

Torsten H Voigt (TH)

Institute of Sociology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. thvoigt@soziologie.rwth-aachen.de.

Verena Holtz (V)

Institute of Sociology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Emilia Niemiec (E)

Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Heidi C Howard (HC)

Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Anna Middleton (A)

Society and Ethics Research, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Barbara Prainsack (B)

Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH