Effect of Delayed Targeted Intraoperative Radiotherapy vs Whole-Breast Radiotherapy on Local Recurrence and Survival: Long-term Results From the TARGIT-A Randomized Clinical Trial in Early Breast Cancer.
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2020
01 07 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
3
4
2020
medline:
23
1
2021
entrez:
3
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Conventional adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer given daily for several weeks is onerous and expensive. Some patients may be obliged to choose a mastectomy instead, and some may forgo radiotherapy altogether. We proposed a clinical trial to test whether radiotherapy could be safely limited to the tumor bed. To determine whether delayed second-procedure targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) is noninferior to whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in terms of local control. In this prospective, randomized (1:1 ratio) noninferiority trial, 1153 patients aged 45 years or older with invasive ductal breast carcinoma smaller than 3.5 cm treated with breast conservation were enrolled from 28 centers in 9 countries. Data were locked in on July 3, 2019. The TARGIT-A trial was started in March 2000; patients were randomized after needle biopsy to receive TARGIT-IORT immediately after lumpectomy under the same anesthetic vs EBRT and results have been shown to be noninferior. A parallel study, described in this article, was initiated in 2004; patients who had their cancer excised were randomly allocated using separate randomization tables to receive EBRT or delayed TARGIT-IORT given as a second procedure by reopening the lumpectomy wound. A noninferiority margin for local recurrence rate of 2.5% at 5 years, and long-term survival outcomes. Overall, 581 women (mean [SD] age, 63 [7] years) were randomized to delayed TARGIT-IORT and 572 patients (mean [SD] age, 63 [8] years) were randomized to EBRT. Sixty patients (5%) had tumors larger than 2 cm, or had positive nodes and only 32 (2.7%) were younger than 50 years. Delayed TARGIT-IORT was not noninferior to EBRT. The local recurrence rates at 5-year complete follow-up were: delayed TARGIT-IORT vs EBRT (23/581 [3.96%] vs 6/572 [1.05%], respectively; difference, 2.91%; upper 90% CI, 4.4%). With long-term follow-up (median [IQR], 9.0 [7.5-10.5] years), there was no statistically significant difference in local recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-1.003; P = .052), mastectomy-free survival (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.65-1.18; P = .38), distant disease-free survival (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.72-1.39; P = .98), or overall survival (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.68-1.35; P = .80). These long-term data show that despite an increase in the number of local recurrences with delayed TARGIT-IORT, there was no statistically significant decrease in mastectomy-free survival, distant disease-free survival, or overall survival. ISRCTN34086741, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00983684.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32239210
pii: 2763397
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0249
pmc: PMC7348682
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00983684']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e200249Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 07/60/49
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 10/104/07
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 14/49/13
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : HTA/14/49/13
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Lancet. 2016 Jan 16;387(10015):229-38
pubmed: 26494415
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Aug;140(3):519-25
pubmed: 23877341
Lancet. 2002 May 11;359(9318):1686-9
pubmed: 12020548
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 25;9:33
pubmed: 24461031
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jan;143(1):135-40
pubmed: 24292868
Lancet. 2017 Sep 9;390(10099):1048-1060
pubmed: 28779963
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Sep;20(73):1-188
pubmed: 27689969
Eur J Cancer. 1998 Jul;34(8):1143-4
pubmed: 9849470
World J Surg Oncol. 2006 Jan 17;4:2
pubmed: 16417631
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Jan;15(1 Suppl):120-7
pubmed: 19147090
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Mar 1;14(5):1325-32
pubmed: 18316551
J Theor Biol. 2007 May 21;246(2):245-59
pubmed: 17289081
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002 Jun;28(4):447-54
pubmed: 12099658
Lancet. 1997 Jan 18;349(9046):208
pubmed: 9111565
Strahlenther Onkol. 2010 Aug;186(8):444-51
pubmed: 20803285
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Sep 1;96(1):55-64
pubmed: 27511847
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):651-60
pubmed: 23374650
Lancet. 2010 Jul 10;376(9735):71-2
pubmed: 20570344
Radiat Res. 2005 Feb;163(2):208-15
pubmed: 15658897
Stat Med. 2006 Apr 15;25(7):1115-30
pubmed: 16381070
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Mar;51(4):451-63
pubmed: 25605582
Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953
pubmed: 30350310
Br J Cancer. 1996 Sep;74(5):820-4
pubmed: 8795588
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Dec;14(13):1269-77
pubmed: 24225155
Br J Radiol. 2004 Apr;77(916):279-84
pubmed: 15107317
Lancet. 2010 Jul 10;376(9735):91-102
pubmed: 20570343
Oncotarget. 2014 Aug 15;5(15):6267-79
pubmed: 25026286
Lancet. 2014 Feb 15;383(9917):603-13
pubmed: 24224997
Oncogene. 2016 Sep 15;35(37):4914-26
pubmed: 26876200
Ann Oncol. 2001 Aug;12(8):1075-80
pubmed: 11583188
Mol Oncol. 2014 May;8(3):766-80
pubmed: 24661902