Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus CCRT for locally advanced hypopharynx and base of tongue cancer.
Base of tongue cancer
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Hypopharyngeal neoplasms
Induction chemotherapy
Locally advanced
Journal
The Korean journal of internal medicine
ISSN: 2005-6648
Titre abrégé: Korean J Intern Med
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 8712418
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
15
05
2019
accepted:
02
10
2019
pubmed:
4
4
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
entrez:
4
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clinical trials have not consistently supported the use of induction chemotherapy (IC) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer. Hypopharynx and base of tongue (BOT) cancer has shown relatively poor survival. We investigated the role of IC in improving outcome over current chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with hypopharynx and BOT cancer. Treatment-naïve patients with stage III/IV (M0) hypopharynx or BOT cancer were randomly assigned to receive CRT alone (CRT arm: cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on D1 3-weekly, two times plus radiotherapy 68.4 Gy/30 fractions on weekdays) versus two 21-day cycles of IC with TPF (docetaxel & cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on D1, and fluorouracil 75 mg/m2 on D1-4) followed by the same CRT regimen (IC arm). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). This study closed early after enrollment of 36 patients (19 in the CRT arm, 17 in the IC arm). After a median follow-up of 47.2 months, there was no significant difference in PFS: the median PFS was 26.8 months for the CRT arm and was not reached for the IC arm (p = 0.13). However, the survival curves were widely separated with a plateau after 3 years, suggesting a potential survival benefit from IC: 3-year PFS rates were 45% and 68%, and 3-year overall survival rates were 56% and 86%, in the CRT and IC arms, respectively. This study failed to demonstrate that induction TPF chemotherapy improves survival in patients with BOT and hypopharynx cancer. However, it suggested a favorable outcome with IC to this population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Clinical trials have not consistently supported the use of induction chemotherapy (IC) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer. Hypopharynx and base of tongue (BOT) cancer has shown relatively poor survival. We investigated the role of IC in improving outcome over current chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with hypopharynx and BOT cancer.
METHODS
Treatment-naïve patients with stage III/IV (M0) hypopharynx or BOT cancer were randomly assigned to receive CRT alone (CRT arm: cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on D1 3-weekly, two times plus radiotherapy 68.4 Gy/30 fractions on weekdays) versus two 21-day cycles of IC with TPF (docetaxel & cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on D1, and fluorouracil 75 mg/m2 on D1-4) followed by the same CRT regimen (IC arm). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS
This study closed early after enrollment of 36 patients (19 in the CRT arm, 17 in the IC arm). After a median follow-up of 47.2 months, there was no significant difference in PFS: the median PFS was 26.8 months for the CRT arm and was not reached for the IC arm (p = 0.13). However, the survival curves were widely separated with a plateau after 3 years, suggesting a potential survival benefit from IC: 3-year PFS rates were 45% and 68%, and 3-year overall survival rates were 56% and 86%, in the CRT and IC arms, respectively.
CONCLUSION
This study failed to demonstrate that induction TPF chemotherapy improves survival in patients with BOT and hypopharynx cancer. However, it suggested a favorable outcome with IC to this population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32241084
pii: kjim.2019.161
doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.161
pmc: PMC8009170
doi:
Substances chimiques
Docetaxel
15H5577CQD
Cisplatin
Q20Q21Q62J
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S217-S224Subventions
Organisme : AbbVie
Organisme : Astellas Pharma
Organisme : Astra Zeneca
Organisme : Boehringer Ingelheim
Organisme : Clovis Oncology
Organisme : Eli Lilly and Company
Organisme : GSK
Organisme : Hanmi
Organisme : Kyowa Hakko Kirin
Organisme : MSD
Organisme : Ono Pharmaceutical
Organisme : Roche Italia
Références
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Apr 1;101(7):498-506
pubmed: 19318632
N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 25;357(17):1695-704
pubmed: 17960012
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Dec 16;108(4):
pubmed: 26681800
Ann Oncol. 2009 May;20(5):921-7
pubmed: 19179556
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 1;22(1):69-76
pubmed: 14657228
Head Neck. 2017 Sep;39(9):1770-1778
pubmed: 28557276
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jul;92(1):4-14
pubmed: 19446902
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan;46(1):40-5
pubmed: 26561556
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):257-64
pubmed: 23414589
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jan 1;23(1):88-95
pubmed: 15625363
N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 25;357(17):1705-15
pubmed: 17960013
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 1;32(25):2735-43
pubmed: 25049329
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8636-45
pubmed: 16275937