Effective brain connectivity at rest is associated with choice-induced preference formation.


Journal

Human brain mapping
ISSN: 1097-0193
Titre abrégé: Hum Brain Mapp
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9419065

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 08 2020
Historique:
received: 25 11 2019
revised: 13 03 2020
accepted: 14 03 2020
pubmed: 4 4 2020
medline: 11 11 2021
entrez: 4 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Preferences can change as a consequence of making hard decisions whereby the value of chosen options increases and the value of rejected options decreases. Such choice-induced preference changes have been associated with brain areas detecting choice conflict (anterior cingulate cortex, ACC), updating stimulus value (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dlPFC) and supporting memory of stimulus value (hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex, vmPFC). Here we investigated whether resting-state neuronal activity within these regions is associated with the magnitude of individuals' preference updates. We fitted a dynamic causal model (DCM) to resting-state neuronal activity in the spectral domain (spDCM) and estimated the causal connectivity among core regions involved in preference formation following hard choices. The extent of individuals' choice-induced preference changes were found to be associated with a diminished resting-state excitation between the left dlPFC and the vmPFC, whereas preference consistency was related to a higher resting-state excitation from the ACC to the left hippocampus and vmPFC. Our results point to a model of preference formation during which the dynamic network configurations between left dlPFC, ACC, vmPFC and left hippocampus at rest are linked to preference change or stability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32243689
doi: 10.1002/hbm.24999
pmc: PMC7336152
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3077-3088

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Références

Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Mar;9(3):182-94
pubmed: 18270514
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 1;106:1-14
pubmed: 25463471
Brain Connect. 2012;2(2):80-90
pubmed: 22559836
Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1273-302
pubmed: 12948688
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):545-56
pubmed: 18545266
J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 26;34(48):15988-96
pubmed: 25429140
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 16;6:21778
pubmed: 26879047
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 23;39(4):718-726
pubmed: 30530856
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 23;7:41320
pubmed: 28112261
Neuron. 2015 May 20;86(4):1078-1090
pubmed: 25996135
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013 Dec;13(4):900-15
pubmed: 23640112
Brain Sci. 2016 Dec 29;7(1):
pubmed: 28036071
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 12;116(7):2743-2748
pubmed: 30692255
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 May 04;10:195
pubmed: 27199716
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Dec;43(12):1872-1882
pubmed: 28504526
Brain Connect. 2013;3(2):99-120
pubmed: 23294010
Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 15;200:174-190
pubmed: 31226497
Neuron. 2010 Jan 28;65(2):280-90
pubmed: 20152133
Science. 2000 Jun 9;288(5472):1835-8
pubmed: 10846167
Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 07;4:41
pubmed: 23404185
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1958-1966
pubmed: 31429061
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Oct 02;14(11):1468-74
pubmed: 21964488
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):573-94
pubmed: 20658837
Front Neurosci. 2014 Mar 18;8:50
pubmed: 24672421
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 29;38(35):7649-7666
pubmed: 30061189
Science. 2009 May 1;324(5927):646-8
pubmed: 19407204
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 29;9(9):e108579
pubmed: 25264950
J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 13;33(11):4886-95
pubmed: 23486959
Cereb Cortex. 2015 May;25(5):1219-27
pubmed: 24275827
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 21;107(51):22014-9
pubmed: 21135218
Neuroimage. 2016 Mar;128:413-431
pubmed: 26569570
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Aug 1;41(11):3077-3088
pubmed: 32243689
Netw Neurosci. 2017;1(3):222-241
pubmed: 29400357
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:485-495
pubmed: 29284140
Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):220-34
pubmed: 17055746
Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 15;56(4):2089-99
pubmed: 21459150
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):700-11
pubmed: 17704812
Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Sep;10(3):730-8
pubmed: 26271206
J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 25;29(12):3760-5
pubmed: 19321772
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 15;180(Pt B):594-608
pubmed: 29158202
Neuroimage. 2014 Jul 1;94:396-407
pubmed: 24345387

Auteurs

Katharina Voigt (K)

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Carsten Murawski (C)

Department of Finance, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.

Sebastian Speer (S)

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Stefan Bode (S)

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH