Determinants of empirical antipseudomonal antibiotic prescription for adults with pneumonia in the emergency department.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Community-Acquired Infections
/ drug therapy
Cross Infection
/ drug therapy
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Pneumonia, Bacterial
/ drug therapy
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prescriptions
/ statistics & numerical data
Pseudomonas Infections
/ drug therapy
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
/ isolation & purification
Retrospective Studies
Spain
Antipseudomonal antibiotics
Guidelines
Levofloxacin
P aeruginosa
Pneumonia
Journal
BMC pulmonary medicine
ISSN: 1471-2466
Titre abrégé: BMC Pulm Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Apr 2020
03 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
17
11
2019
accepted:
13
03
2020
entrez:
5
4
2020
pubmed:
5
4
2020
medline:
21
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antipseudomonal antibiotics should be restricted to patients at risk of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. However, the indications in different guidelines on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are discordant. Our objectives were to assess the prevalence of antipseudomonal antibiotic prescriptions and to identify determinants of empirical antibiotic choices in the emergency department. Observational, retrospective, one-year cohort study in hospitalized adults with pneumonia. Antibiotic choices and clinical and demographic data were recorded on a standardized form. Antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity were classified into two groups: a) β-lactam antipseudomonals (β-APS), including carbapenems, piperacillin / tazobactam or cefepime (in monotherapy or combination) and b) monotherapy with antipseudomonal quinolones. Data were recorded from 549 adults with pneumonia, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa being isolated in only nine (1.6%). Most (85%) prescriptions were compliant with SEPAR guidelines and 207 (37%) patients received antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity (14% β-APS and 23% levofloxacin). The use of β-APS was independently associated with ICU admission (OR 8.16 95% CI 3.69-18.06) and prior hospitalization (OR 6.76 95% CI 3.02-15.15), while levofloxacin was associated with negative pneumococcal urine antigen tests (OR 3.41 95% CI 1.70-6.85) but negatively associated with ICU admission (OR 0.26 95% CI 0.08-0.86). None of these factors were associated with P aeruginosa episodes. In univariate analysis, prior P aeruginosa infection/colonization (2/9 vs 6/372, p = 0.013), severe COPD (3/9 vs 26/372, p = 0.024), multilobar involvement (7/9 vs 119/372, p = 0.007) and prior antibiotic (6/9 vs 109/372, p = 0.025) were significantly associated with P aeruginosa episodes. Antipseudomonal prescriptions were common, in spite of the very low incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The rationale for prescription was influenced by both severity-of-illness and pneumococcal urine antigen test (levofloxacin) and prior hospitalization and ICU admission (β-APS). However, these factors were not associated with P aeruginosa episodes. Only prior P aeruginosa infection/colonization and severe COPD seem to be reliable indicators in clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Antipseudomonal antibiotics should be restricted to patients at risk of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. However, the indications in different guidelines on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are discordant. Our objectives were to assess the prevalence of antipseudomonal antibiotic prescriptions and to identify determinants of empirical antibiotic choices in the emergency department.
METHODS
METHODS
Observational, retrospective, one-year cohort study in hospitalized adults with pneumonia. Antibiotic choices and clinical and demographic data were recorded on a standardized form. Antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity were classified into two groups: a) β-lactam antipseudomonals (β-APS), including carbapenems, piperacillin / tazobactam or cefepime (in monotherapy or combination) and b) monotherapy with antipseudomonal quinolones.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Data were recorded from 549 adults with pneumonia, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa being isolated in only nine (1.6%). Most (85%) prescriptions were compliant with SEPAR guidelines and 207 (37%) patients received antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity (14% β-APS and 23% levofloxacin). The use of β-APS was independently associated with ICU admission (OR 8.16 95% CI 3.69-18.06) and prior hospitalization (OR 6.76 95% CI 3.02-15.15), while levofloxacin was associated with negative pneumococcal urine antigen tests (OR 3.41 95% CI 1.70-6.85) but negatively associated with ICU admission (OR 0.26 95% CI 0.08-0.86). None of these factors were associated with P aeruginosa episodes. In univariate analysis, prior P aeruginosa infection/colonization (2/9 vs 6/372, p = 0.013), severe COPD (3/9 vs 26/372, p = 0.024), multilobar involvement (7/9 vs 119/372, p = 0.007) and prior antibiotic (6/9 vs 109/372, p = 0.025) were significantly associated with P aeruginosa episodes.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Antipseudomonal prescriptions were common, in spite of the very low incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The rationale for prescription was influenced by both severity-of-illness and pneumococcal urine antigen test (levofloxacin) and prior hospitalization and ICU admission (β-APS). However, these factors were not associated with P aeruginosa episodes. Only prior P aeruginosa infection/colonization and severe COPD seem to be reliable indicators in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32245452
doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-1115-0
pii: 10.1186/s12890-020-1115-0
pmc: PMC7126131
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
83Références
Chest. 2009 Jan;135(1):165-172
pubmed: 18689575
Eur Respir J. 2016 Jul;48(1):257-61
pubmed: 27103390
Chest. 2016 Aug;150(2):415-25
pubmed: 27060725
Eur Respir J. 2010 Mar;35(3):598-605
pubmed: 19679601
Eur Respir J. 2009 Jan;33(1):153-9
pubmed: 18768577
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Sep 15;176(6):532-55
pubmed: 17507545
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67
pubmed: 31573350
Respirology. 2015 May;20(4):660-6
pubmed: 25776134
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):856-863
pubmed: 28874937
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1619-28
pubmed: 25337751
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Apr;36(4):612-20
pubmed: 19953222
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Apr;40(4):572-81
pubmed: 24638939
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Oct;1(8):653-662
pubmed: 24461668
Emergencias. 2018 Oct;30(5):297-302
pubmed: 30260113
Thorax. 2011 Apr;66(4):340-6
pubmed: 21257985
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Aug;27(8):657-61
pubmed: 18317821
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2:S27-72
pubmed: 17278083
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;58(3):330-9
pubmed: 24270053
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;163(7):1730-54
pubmed: 11401897
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 15;171(4):388-416
pubmed: 15699079
Eur Respir J. 2019 Jul 4;54(1):
pubmed: 31023851
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Feb 15;54(4):479-82
pubmed: 22109952
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Nov;17 Suppl 6:E1-59
pubmed: 21951385
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
ERJ Open Res. 2016 Oct 19;2(4):
pubmed: 28053969
Thorax. 2009 Oct;64 Suppl 3:iii1-55
pubmed: 19783532
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;38(8):937-944
pubmed: 28633678
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Dec 15;41(12):1709-16
pubmed: 16288392
Respir Med. 2007 Oct;101(10):2139-44
pubmed: 17629470
Respir Med. 2007 Sep;101(9):1909-15
pubmed: 17628462
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Feb 15;54(4):470-8
pubmed: 22109954
Respirology. 2016 Jan;21(1):157-63
pubmed: 26682638
BMJ. 2017 Jul 10;358:j2471
pubmed: 28694251
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Feb;12(2):153-60
pubmed: 25521229
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Sep;58(9):5262-8
pubmed: 24957843
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Feb;46(2):245-265
pubmed: 31781835
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Sep 9;162(16):1849-58
pubmed: 12196083
Lancet. 2015 Sep 12;386(9998):1097-108
pubmed: 26277247
Eur Respir J. 2018 Aug 9;52(2):
pubmed: 29976651
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Nov 1;61(9):1403-10
pubmed: 26223995
Arch Bronconeumol. 2005 May;41(5):272-89
pubmed: 15919009
Respirology. 2009 Jan;14(1):105-11
pubmed: 18699803