The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care.
Electronic symptom assessment
qualitative research.
symptoms & symptom management
user acceptance
Journal
BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Apr 2020
04 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
02
12
2019
accepted:
24
03
2020
entrez:
6
4
2020
pubmed:
6
4
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients in oncological and palliative care (PC) often have complex needs, which require a comprehensive treatment approach. The assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve identification of patient needs and foster adjustment of treatment. This study explores occupational routines, attitudes and expectations of physicians and nurses with regards to a planned electronic assessment system of PROs. Ten physicians and nine nurses from various PC settings in Southern Germany were interviewed. The interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis. The interviewees were sceptical about the quality of data generated through a patient self-assessment system. They criticised the rigidity of the electronic assessment questionnaire, which the interviewees noted may not fit the profile of all palliative patients. They feared the loss of personal contact between medical staff and patients and favoured in-person conversation and on-site observations on site over the potential system. Interviewees saw potential in being able to discover unseen needs from some patients. Interviewees evaluated the system positively in the case that the system served to broadly orient care plans without affecting or reducing the patient-caregiver relationship. A significant portion of the results touch upon the symbolic acceptance of the suggested system, which stands for an increasing standardisation and technisation of medicine where interpersonal contact and the professional expertise are marginalized. The study results can provide insight for processes and communication in the run-up to and during the implementation of electronic assessment systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32247316
doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00554-9
pii: 10.1186/s12904-020-00554-9
pmc: PMC7129326
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
45Références
Palliat Med. 2014 Feb;28(2):158-75
pubmed: 23801463
Palliat Med. 2016 Jan;30(1):6-22
pubmed: 26068193
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Mar 25;14:42
pubmed: 23530627
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Sep;12(4):380-6
pubmed: 18539527
Fam Pract. 2019 Oct 8;36(5):639-643
pubmed: 30649266
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jun;23(6):508-18
pubmed: 24505110
Cancer. 2008 Aug 1;113(3):628-37
pubmed: 18543317
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2017 Jul;67(7):296-303
pubmed: 28719921
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10;29(8):994-1000
pubmed: 21282546
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 22;21(1):e10004
pubmed: 30668517
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
Qual Life Res. 2014 Jun;23(5):1603-7
pubmed: 24307212
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 May;62(598):e344-52
pubmed: 22546594
Qual Life Res. 2016 May;25(5):1103-12
pubmed: 26563251
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10;29(8):1029-35
pubmed: 21282548
Comput Inform Nurs. 2008 Jul-Aug;26(4):183-9
pubmed: 18600124
JAMA. 2002 Dec 18;288(23):3027-34
pubmed: 12479768
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Feb 15;22(4):714-24
pubmed: 14966096
Palliat Med. 2014 Jun;28(6):480-490
pubmed: 24534727
Palliat Med. 2011 Oct;25(7):675-81
pubmed: 21474620
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10;29(8):954-6
pubmed: 21282536
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Mar;49(3):611-24
pubmed: 25135657
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1846-58
pubmed: 25888610
Lung Cancer. 2017 Nov;113:140-151
pubmed: 29110842