Large check size pattern reversal visual evoked potentials - Full and sectorial field stimulation in multiple sclerosis and controls.
Central field
Latency
Multiple sclerosis
Optic neuritis
Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials
Peripheral field
VEP
Journal
Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia
ISSN: 1532-2653
Titre abrégé: J Clin Neurosci
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 9433352
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
07
10
2019
accepted:
06
01
2020
pubmed:
6
4
2020
medline:
30
9
2020
entrez:
6
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials have been used to study optic neuritis. Although smaller check size in the central fields are more sensitive, larger check sizes can be advantageous for patient fixation and in poor vision. We compared sectorial central and peripheral hemisurround stimulus with commonly used full- and half- field stimulus using large check sizes (65') in the context of optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Of 19 female and 16 male control subjects studied, females had shorter P100 latencies and larger amplitudes than males. In 9 of the 18 patients with VEP abnormalities, the central field abnormalities were greater than those recorded with the full field response. The results confirm for the first time that central field stimulation using large checks can show a greater extent of abnormality than can be appreciated with large check full field stimulation alone, and could be commonly employed to improve yield in the investigation of optic neuritis. The data suggest that it is necessary to collect separate gender-specific laboratory normal values using this check size.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32247741
pii: S0967-5868(19)31952-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.045
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181-187Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.