Safety and efficacy of antiplatelet regimens after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stents: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Coronary Artery Disease
/ mortality
Coronary Thrombosis
/ mortality
Drug-Eluting Stents
Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy
/ adverse effects
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Myocardial Infarction
/ mortality
Network Meta-Analysis
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Drug eluting stents
Dual anti-platelet therapy
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Journal
Progress in cardiovascular diseases
ISSN: 1873-1740
Titre abrégé: Prog Cardiovasc Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376442
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
29
03
2020
accepted:
29
03
2020
pubmed:
6
4
2020
medline:
18
8
2020
entrez:
6
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of different anti-platelet regimens after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug eluting stent (DES) implantation using a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs comparing shorter duration (≤6 months) of dual antiplatelet therapy (S-DAPT) with either aspirin (ASA) or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy against longer duration (≥12 months) DAPT (L-DAPT) after PCI were searched in the MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases. End-points of interest were all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), major bleeding and major or minor bleeding. Network meta-analyses were performed using frequentist approach. Eighteen RCTs with total of 57,942 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This included 14 RCTs (N = 28,853) of S-DAPT with ASA monotherapy and 4 RCTs (N = 29,089) with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. Compared with L-DAPT, the odds of MI were higher with S-DAPT with ASA monotherapy [OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.01-1.48], but not with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy [0.98; 0.85-1.14]. Both S-DAPT regimens lowered rates of major bleeding when compared with L-DAPT; ASA monotherapy [0.70; 0.49-1.00] and P2Y12 monotherapy [0.67; 0.45-0.98]. There were no differences in risks of all-cause or CV death between either regimen of S-DAPT and L-DAPT. However, in the acute coronary syndrome subgroup, ASA monotherapy was associated with increased risk of ST [1.55; 1.021-2.36] but P2Y12 monotherapy was not [0.93; 0.58-1.48]. Amongst patients undergoing DES implantation, S-DAPT with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy reduces bleeding without increased risk of MI or ST compared with L-DAPT. Prospective trials are needed to evaluate if S-DAPT with P2Y12 monotherapy is superior to S-DAPT with ASA monotherapy for ischemic protection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32247786
pii: S0033-0620(20)30072-4
doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.03.018
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
243-248Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest None declared.