Diversified Farming in a Monoculture Landscape: Effects on Honey Bee Health and Wild Bee Communities.
Apis mellifera
diversified farming
honey bee
wild bee
Journal
Environmental entomology
ISSN: 1938-2936
Titre abrégé: Environ Entomol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7502320
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 06 2020
13 06 2020
Historique:
received:
21
08
2019
pubmed:
7
4
2020
medline:
27
10
2020
entrez:
7
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the last century, a global transformation of Earth's surface has occurred due to human activity with extensive agriculture replacing natural ecosystems. Concomitant declines in wild and managed bees are occurring, largely due to a lack of floral resources and inadequate nutrition, caused by conversion to monoculture-based farming. Diversified fruit and vegetable farms may provide an enhanced variety of resources through crops and weedy plants, which have potential to sustain human and bee nutrition. We hypothesized fruit and vegetable farms can enhance honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Apis mellifera Linnaeus) colony growth and nutritional state over a soybean monoculture, as well as support a more diverse wild bee community. We tracked honey bee colony growth, nutritional state, and wild bee abundance, richness, and diversity in both farm types. Honey bees kept at diversified farms had increased colony weight and preoverwintering nutritional state. Regardless of colony location, precipitous declines in colony weight occurred during autumn and thus colonies were not completely buffered from the stressors of living in a matrix dominated with monocultures. Contrary to our hypothesis, wild bee diversity was greater in soybean, specifically in August, a time when fields are in bloom. These differences were largely driven by four common bee species that performed well in soybean. Overall, these results suggest fruit and vegetable farms provide some benefits for honey bees; however, they do not benefit wild bee communities. Thus, incorporation of natural habitat, rather than diversified farming, in these landscapes, may be a better choice for wild bee conservation efforts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32249293
pii: 5816328
doi: 10.1093/ee/nvaa031
pmc: PMC7371362
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
753-764Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13890-5
pubmed: 16940358
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 13;7:40568
pubmed: 28084452
Science. 2015 Mar 27;347(6229):1255957
pubmed: 25721506
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Jul 29;345(1311):101-18
pubmed: 7972351
Oecologia. 2013 Jun;172(2):477-84
pubmed: 23114428
Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2533-47
pubmed: 23431585
Ecology. 2009 Aug;90(8):2068-76
pubmed: 19739369
J Anim Ecol. 2010 May;79(3):674-81
pubmed: 20233258
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2015 Aug;10:185-193
pubmed: 29588007
Environ Entomol. 2016 Oct;45(5):1099-1106
pubmed: 27516433
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 22;278(1723):3444-51
pubmed: 21471115
Conserv Biol. 2007 Feb;21(1):213-23
pubmed: 17298527
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 22;278(1713):1894-902
pubmed: 21106585
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013 Nov;88(4):1002-21
pubmed: 23578337
Environ Entomol. 2019 Aug 5;48(4):826-835
pubmed: 31144714
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 26;11(7):e0143479
pubmed: 27459648
Environ Entomol. 2015 Jun;44(3):488-98
pubmed: 26313954
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Jan;32(1):68-80
pubmed: 27793463
J Econ Entomol. 2010 Aug;103(4):1039-50
pubmed: 20857710
Curr Biol. 2009 Jun 9;19(11):915-8
pubmed: 19427214
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Feb 6;6(2):181803
pubmed: 30891288
Biometrics. 1987 Dec;43(4):783-91
pubmed: 3427163
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;578:357-365
pubmed: 27847190
Ecol Lett. 2011 Oct;14(10):1062-72
pubmed: 21806746
Ecol Lett. 2007 Apr;10(4):299-314
pubmed: 17355569
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 17;8(6):e66665
pubmed: 23799127
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 May;1195:169-97
pubmed: 20536823
Ecol Appl. 2013 Jun;23(4):829-39
pubmed: 23865233
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 13;113(37):10430-5
pubmed: 27573824
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):303-13
pubmed: 17164193
Ecol Lett. 2008 May;11(5):499-515
pubmed: 18294214
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 02;9(4):e93495
pubmed: 24695678
Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4
pubmed: 16040698
PLoS Biol. 2007 Jun;5(6):e168
pubmed: 17564497
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 10;116(50):25147-25155
pubmed: 31767769
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 5;113(1):140-5
pubmed: 26699460
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):345-53
pubmed: 20188434
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 24;99(26):16812-6
pubmed: 12486221
Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1608-11
pubmed: 23449997
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37235
pubmed: 22629374
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 17;114(42):11247-11252
pubmed: 28973922
Sci Rep. 2019 May 1;9(1):6778
pubmed: 31043647
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 10;10(9):e0137198
pubmed: 26356234
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 12;15(2):e0228169
pubmed: 32049993
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):e0189268
pubmed: 29220412
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 12;11(4):e0153531
pubmed: 27070422