Ethical Issues Raised by the Introduction of Artificial Companions to Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Call for Interdisciplinary Collaborations.
Dementia
ethics
robots
technology
Journal
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD
ISSN: 1875-8908
Titre abrégé: J Alzheimers Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9814863
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
pubmed:
7
4
2020
medline:
8
5
2021
entrez:
7
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Due to the high costs of providing long-term care to older adults with cognitive impairment, artificial companions are increasingly considered as a cost-efficient way to provide support. Artificial companions can comfort, entertain, and inform, and even induce a sense of being in a close relationship. Sensors and algorithms are increasingly leading to applications that exude a life-like feel. We focus on a case study of an artificial companion for people with cognitive impairment. This companion is an avatar on an electronic tablet that is displayed as a dog or a cat. Whereas artificial intelligence guides most artificial companions, this application also relies on technicians "behind" the on-screen avatar, who via surveillance, interact with users. This case is notable because it particularly illustrates the tension between the endless opportunities offered by technology and the ethical issues stemming from limited regulations. Reviewing the case through the lens of biomedical ethics, concerns of deception, monitoring and tracking, as well as informed consent and social isolation are raised by the introduction of this technology to users with cognitive impairment. We provide a detailed description of the case, review the main ethical issues and present two theoretical frameworks, the "human-driven technology" platform and the emancipatory gerontology framework, to inform the design of future applications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32250295
pii: JAD190952
doi: 10.3233/JAD-190952
pmc: PMC7437496
mid: NIHMS1617534
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
445-455Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K01 AG059831
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : L30 AG060590
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K01 AG049102
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R56 AG062165
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG044281
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Public Policy Aging Rep. 2017;27(2):53-61
pubmed: 31148911
Gerontologist. 2018 May 8;58(3):467-477
pubmed: 28201730
Age Ageing. 2018 Nov 1;47(6):771-774
pubmed: 29546366
J Med Ethics. 2019 Mar;45(3):156-160
pubmed: 30467198
Alzheimers Dement. 2007 Jul;3(3):217-26
pubmed: 19595941
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(4):1517-1529
pubmed: 29376864
Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(1):79-88
pubmed: 28329804
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;69(4):897-904
pubmed: 31104020
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Apr;82(4):e47-62
pubmed: 22727612
Nature. 2017 Nov 8;551(7679):159-163
pubmed: 29120438
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Sep;13(9):1075-1076
pubmed: 28870374
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Sep;14(9):1104-1113
pubmed: 29937247
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1478-1482
pubmed: 28402767
Pediatrics. 2018 Nov;142(Suppl 3):S163-S169
pubmed: 30385623
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018 Oct 15;376(2133):
pubmed: 30323000
Law Med Health Care. 1989 Fall;17(3):234-44
pubmed: 2811462
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Aug;24(4):1035-1055
pubmed: 28940133
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):23
pubmed: 28376811
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Apr;83(4):235-48
pubmed: 24529817
BMJ. 2018 Nov 21;363:k4854
pubmed: 30463879
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Summer;41(2):484-500
pubmed: 23802899