The nurse practitioner as a bridge to interprofessional research team collaboration in rural community clinics.
Journal
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
ISSN: 2327-6924
Titre abrégé: J Am Assoc Nurse Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101600770
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2020
01 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
23
07
2019
accepted:
27
11
2019
pubmed:
7
4
2020
medline:
25
11
2021
entrez:
7
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clinical health outcomes and health disparities can be improved through interprofessional collaborations among multidisciplinary clinicians, health care services researchers, and patients. Bridging gaps between community clinics and urban academic centers allows added valuable perspectives that can lead to improved care and extend clinical research. Nurse practitioners (NPs) who serve as primary care providers in many rural community clinics can facilitate access to clinical trials for patients who are rarely included in health care services research as well as coordinate interprofessional research team collaboration. A NP working in a rural clinic can assist academic-based research teams in designing feasible strategies to address disparities and improve health care of underserved populations. The purpose of this article was to provide an example of a rural provider/urban academic research team collaborating to conduct a health literacy-directed randomized controlled trial to improve colorectal cancer screening in isolated rural community clinics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32251036
pii: 01741002-202105000-00014
doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000387
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
409-413Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 American Association of Nurse Practitioners.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Arnold C. L., Rademaker A., Morris J., Wiltz G., Ferguson L. A., Davis T. C. (2019). Follow-up approaches to a health literacy intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in rural community clinics: A randomized control trial. Cancer, 125, 3615–3622
Arnold C. L., Rademaker A., Wolf M. S., Liu D., Hancock J., Davis T. C. (2016a). Third annual fecal occult blood testing in community health clinics. American Journal of Health Behavior, 40, 302–309.
Arnold C. L., Rademaker A., Wolf M. S., Liu D., Lucas G., Hancock J., Davis T. C. (2016b). Final results of a 3-year literacy-informed intervention to promote annual fecal occult blood test screening. Journal of Community Health, 41, 724–731.
Baquet C. R., Commiskey P., Daniel Mullins C., Mishra S. I. (2006). Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: Socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 30, 24–33.
Cacchione P. Z. (2015). Interdisciplinary research teams. Clinical Nursing Research, 24, 119–120.
Choi B. C., Pak A. W. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29, 351–364.
Collins F. S., Wilder E. L., Zerhouni E. (2014). Funding transdisciplinary research. NIH Roadmap/Common Fund at 10 years. Science, 345, 274–276.
Davis T., Arnold C., Rademaker A., Bennett C., Bailey S., Platt D., Wolf M. (2013). Improving colon cancer screening in community clinics. Cancer, 119, 3879–3886.
Davis T. C., Arnold C. L., Bennett C. L., Wolf M. S., Reynolds C., Liu D., Rademaker A. (2014). Strategies to improve repeat fecal occult blood testing cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 23, 134–143.
Davis T. C., Arnold C. L., Mills G., Miele L. (2019). A qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators of enrolling underrepresented populations in clinical trials and biobanking. Front Cell Dev Biol, 7, 74.
Friedman D. B., Foster C., Bergeron C. D., Tanner A., Kim S. H. (2015). A qualitative study of recruitment barriers, motivators, and community-based strategies for increasing clinical trials participation among rural and urban populations. American Journal of Health Promotion, 29, 332–338.
Gee B. M., Devine N., Aubuchon-Endsley N. L., Brumley M., Ramsdell-Hudock H. L., Swann H. E. (2017). The reciprocity team: Development of an interprofessional research collaboration. Journal of Allied Health, 46, e43–e49.
Hager K., St. Hill C., Prunuske J., Swaniski M., Anderson G., Nawal Lutfiyya M. (2016). Development of an interprofessional and interdisciplinary collaborative research practice for clinical faculty. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30, 265–267.
Karam M., Brault I., Van Durme T., Macq J. (2018). Comparing interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in healthcare: A systematic review of the qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 79, 70–83.
Kennedy A. E., Vanderpool R. C., Croyle R. T., Srinivasan S. (2018). An overview of the National Cancer Institute's initiatives to accelerate rural cancer control research. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 27, 1240–1244.
Lakhani J., Benzies K., Hayden K. A. (2012). Attributes of interdisciplinary research teams: A comprehensive review of the literature. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 35, E226.
National Academies (U.S.). Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research., Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy (U.S.), National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), National Academy of Engineering., & Institute of Medicine (U.S.). (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Palumbo M. V., De Gagne J. C., Murphy G. (2016). Interprofessional care of elders: Utilizing the virtual learning environment. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 28, 465–470.
Paradis E., Reeves S. (2013). Key trends in interprofessional research: A macrosociological analysis from 1970 to 2010. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27, 113–122.
Reeves S., Pelone F., Harrison R., Goldman J., Zwarenstein M. (2017). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Electronic Resource, 6, CD000072.
Solis G. R. (2017). To give and to get: How nurse faculty scholars contribute and benefit from participating in interdisciplinary research teams. Nursing Forum, 52, 133–137.
Trautman D. E., idzik S., Hammersla M., Rosseter R. (2018). Advancing scholarship through translational research: The role of PhD and DNP prepared nurses. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23, 1.
Weston C., Akinlotan M., Lichorad A., McClellan D., Helduser J., Ojinnaka C., Bolin J. N. (2018). The impact of interprofessional education on family nurse practitioner students' and family medicine residents' knowledge and confidence in screening for breast and cervical cancer. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 30, 511–518.
Wolf R. L., Basch C. E., Zybert P., Basch C. H., Ullman R., Shmukler C., Neugut A. I. (2016). Patient test preference for colorectal cancer screening and screening uptake in an insured urban minority population. Journal of Community Health, 41, 502–508.
World Health Organization [WHO]. (2010). Health literacy and health behavior. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/7gchp/track2/en/.