Performance evaluation of a prototype rapid diagnostic test for combined detection of gambiense human African trypanosomiasis and malaria.
Adolescent
Adult
Antigens, Protozoan
/ blood
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
/ methods
Female
Humans
Malaria
/ blood
Male
Plasmodium falciparum
Prospective Studies
Protozoan Proteins
/ blood
Sensitivity and Specificity
Trypanosoma brucei gambiense
Trypanosomiasis, African
/ blood
Uganda
Young Adult
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
24
05
2019
accepted:
24
02
2020
revised:
16
04
2020
pubmed:
7
4
2020
medline:
7
7
2020
entrez:
7
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Malaria is endemic in all regions where gambiense or rhodesiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is reported, and both diseases have similarities in their symptomatology. A combined test could be useful for both diseases and would facilitate integration of the screening for gambiense HAT (gHAT) and malaria diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate a combined prototype rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for gHAT and malaria. Blood samples were collected in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and in Uganda to evaluate the performance of a prototype HAT/Malaria Combined RDT in comparison to an individual malaria RDT based on Plasmodium falciparum (P.f.) Histidine Rich Protein II (HRP-II or HRP2) antigen (SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f. RDT) for malaria detection and an individual gHAT RDT based on recombinant antigens, the SD BIOLINE HAT 2.0 RDT for HAT screening. Due to the current low prevalence of gHAT in endemic regions, the set of blood samples that were collected was used to evaluate the specificity of the RDTs for gHAT, and additional archived plasma samples were used to complete the evaluation of the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT in comparison to the HAT 2.0 RDT. Frozen whole blood samples from a total of 486 malaria cases and 239 non-malaria controls, as well as archived plasma samples from 246 gHAT positive and 246 gHAT negative individuals were tested. For malaria, the sensitivity and specificity of the malaria band in the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT were 96.9% (95% CI: 95.0-98.3) and 97.1% (95% CI: 94.1-98.8) respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the SD BIOLINE malaria Ag P.f. RDT were 97.3% (95% CI: 95.5-98.6) and 97.1% (95% CI: 94.1-98.8) respectively. For gHAT, using archived plasma samples, the sensitivity and specificity were respectively 89% (95% CI: 84.4-92.6) and 93.5% (95% CI: 89.7-96.2) with the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT, and 88.2% (95% CI: 83.5-92) and 94.7% (95% CI: 91.1-97.2) with the HAT 2.0 RDT. Using the whole blood samples that were collected during the study, the specificity of the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT for gHAT was 95.8% (95% CI: 94.3-97.0). The HAT/Malaria Combined prototype RDT was as accurate as the individual malaria or gHAT RDTs. The HAT/Malaria Combined prototype RDT is therefore suitable for both malaria diagnosis and gHAT screening. However, there is a need to assess its accuracy using fresh samples in prospective clinical trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Malaria is endemic in all regions where gambiense or rhodesiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is reported, and both diseases have similarities in their symptomatology. A combined test could be useful for both diseases and would facilitate integration of the screening for gambiense HAT (gHAT) and malaria diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate a combined prototype rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for gHAT and malaria.
METHODS
Blood samples were collected in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and in Uganda to evaluate the performance of a prototype HAT/Malaria Combined RDT in comparison to an individual malaria RDT based on Plasmodium falciparum (P.f.) Histidine Rich Protein II (HRP-II or HRP2) antigen (SD BIOLINE Malaria Ag P.f. RDT) for malaria detection and an individual gHAT RDT based on recombinant antigens, the SD BIOLINE HAT 2.0 RDT for HAT screening. Due to the current low prevalence of gHAT in endemic regions, the set of blood samples that were collected was used to evaluate the specificity of the RDTs for gHAT, and additional archived plasma samples were used to complete the evaluation of the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT in comparison to the HAT 2.0 RDT.
RESULTS
Frozen whole blood samples from a total of 486 malaria cases and 239 non-malaria controls, as well as archived plasma samples from 246 gHAT positive and 246 gHAT negative individuals were tested. For malaria, the sensitivity and specificity of the malaria band in the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT were 96.9% (95% CI: 95.0-98.3) and 97.1% (95% CI: 94.1-98.8) respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the SD BIOLINE malaria Ag P.f. RDT were 97.3% (95% CI: 95.5-98.6) and 97.1% (95% CI: 94.1-98.8) respectively. For gHAT, using archived plasma samples, the sensitivity and specificity were respectively 89% (95% CI: 84.4-92.6) and 93.5% (95% CI: 89.7-96.2) with the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT, and 88.2% (95% CI: 83.5-92) and 94.7% (95% CI: 91.1-97.2) with the HAT 2.0 RDT. Using the whole blood samples that were collected during the study, the specificity of the HAT/Malaria Combined RDT for gHAT was 95.8% (95% CI: 94.3-97.0).
CONCLUSION
The HAT/Malaria Combined prototype RDT was as accurate as the individual malaria or gHAT RDTs. The HAT/Malaria Combined prototype RDT is therefore suitable for both malaria diagnosis and gHAT screening. However, there is a need to assess its accuracy using fresh samples in prospective clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32251426
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008168
pii: PNTD-D-19-00572
pmc: PMC7162526
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, Protozoan
0
HRP-2 antigen, Plasmodium falciparum
0
Protozoan Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0008168Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. FIND is not a funding agency, but a non-profit organization that is funded by multiple donors. Sylvain Biéler and Joseph Ndung'u, from FIND, have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Malar J. 2016 Jul 15;15:363
pubmed: 27421656
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Mar 28;12(3):e0006386
pubmed: 29590116
Methods Mol Med. 2002;72:103-16
pubmed: 12125106
Front Immunol. 2019 Jan 25;10:39
pubmed: 30740102
PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e55
pubmed: 18303943
Malar J. 2012 Jul 23;11:238
pubmed: 22823983
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 May 22;11(5):e0005585
pubmed: 28531222
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. ;92(39):578-86
pubmed: 28960948
Methods Mol Med. 2002;72:189-203
pubmed: 12125116
EJIFCC. 2009 Jan 20;19(4):203-11
pubmed: 27683318
Res Rep Trop Med. 2013 Feb 04;4:1-6
pubmed: 30100778
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Apr 08;10(4):e0004608
pubmed: 27058033
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e359-63
pubmed: 25103304
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Dec 6;12(12):e0006890
pubmed: 30521525
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Dec;77(6 Suppl):119-27
pubmed: 18165483
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 3;12(7):e0180555
pubmed: 28672036
Pathog Glob Health. 2013 Jul;107(5):273-8
pubmed: 23916337
Acta Trop. 2006 Jan;97(1):55-64
pubmed: 16157286
Malar J. 2016 Sep 07;15:456
pubmed: 27604888
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(6):e1691
pubmed: 22720107
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Oct 23;8(10):e3244
pubmed: 25340404
Parasitology. 2009 Dec;136(14):1943-9
pubmed: 19691861
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993 Oct;61(2):315-20
pubmed: 8264734
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Aug 25;3(8):e412
pubmed: 19707588
Infect Dis Poverty. 2014 Jul 31;3:21
pubmed: 25110585