Asymmetrical characteristics of emotional responses to pictures and sounds: Evidence from pupillometry.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
22
01
2019
accepted:
08
03
2020
entrez:
7
4
2020
pubmed:
7
4
2020
medline:
7
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In daily life, our emotions are often elicited by a multimodal environment, mainly visual and auditory stimuli. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the symmetrical characteristics of emotional responses to pictures and sounds. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the relationship of attentional states to emotional unimodal stimuli (pictures or sounds) and emotional responses by measuring the pupil diameter, which reflects the emotional arousal associated with increased sympathetic activity. Our hypothesis was that the emotional responses to both the image and sound stimuli are symmetrical: emotion might be suppressed when attentional resources are allocated to another stimulus of the same modality as the emotional stimulus-such as a dot presented at the same time as an emotional image, and a beep sound presented at the same time as an emotional sound. In our two experiments, data for 24 participants were analyzed for a pupillary response. In experiment 1, we investigated the relationship of the attentional state with emotional visual stimuli (International Affective Picture System) and emotional responses by using pupillometry. We set four task conditions to modulate the attentional state (emotional task, no task, visual detection task, and auditory detection task). We observed that the velocity of pupillary dilation was faster during the presentation of emotionally arousing pictures compared to that of neutral ones, regardless of the valence of the pictures. Importantly, this effect was not dependent on the task condition. In experiment 2, we investigated the relationship of the attentional state with emotional auditory sounds (International Affective Digitized Sounds) and emotional responses. We observed a trend towards a significant interaction between the stimulus and the task conditions with regard to the velocity of pupillary dilation. In the emotional and auditory detection tasks, the velocity of pupillary dilation was faster with positive and neutral sounds than negative sounds. However, there were no significant differences between the no task and visual detection task conditions. Taken together, the current data reveal that different pupillary responses were elicited to emotional visual and auditory stimuli, at least in the point that there is no attentional effect to emotional responses to visual stimuli, despite both experiments being sufficiently controlled to be of symmetrical experimental design.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32251474
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230775
pii: PONE-D-19-02089
pmc: PMC7135059
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0230775Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
J.M. is employed by TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION. There are no other competing interests to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on data or materials sharing.
Références
Psychophysiology. 2008 Jul;45(4):602-7
pubmed: 18282202
Neurosci Lett. 2003 Sep 4;348(1):41-5
pubmed: 12893421
BMC Neurosci. 2007 Feb 22;8:16
pubmed: 17316444
Neuroreport. 2003 Jun 11;14(8):1107-10
pubmed: 12821791
Psychophysiology. 2017 Apr;54(4):508-518
pubmed: 28072452
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 29;5:781
pubmed: 25120503
Science. 1964 Mar 13;143(3611):1190-2
pubmed: 17833905
Psychophysiology. 2015 Sep;52(9):1186-93
pubmed: 25943211
Emotion. 2019 Feb;19(1):53-69
pubmed: 29504800
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):94-106
pubmed: 29330763
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Science. 1960 Aug 5;132(3423):349-50
pubmed: 14401489
Neurology. 2009 Nov 17;73(20):1699-704
pubmed: 19917994
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Jun;48(2):510-27
pubmed: 25953668
Brain Res. 2008 Sep 16;1230:168-76
pubmed: 18662679
Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar;37(2):204-15
pubmed: 10731770
Psychophysiology. 2014 Sep;51(9):815-8
pubmed: 24849784
Nature. 1976 Dec 23-30;264(5588):746-8
pubmed: 1012311
Nature. 2002 Mar 14;416(6877):172-4
pubmed: 11894093
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):443-6
pubmed: 9176954
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):352-63
pubmed: 14741673
Neurosci Lett. 2007 Jun 15;420(3):251-6
pubmed: 17556101
Psychophysiology. 2017 Oct;54(10):1444-1458
pubmed: 28560724
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Oct;11(10):697-709
pubmed: 20811475
Psychol Res. 2014 Mar;78(2):166-79
pubmed: 23536262
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 01;5:1351
pubmed: 25520679
Sci Rep. 2018 May 2;8(1):6874
pubmed: 29720610
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008 Sep;3(3):233-43
pubmed: 19015115
Neuroreport. 2007 Feb 12;18(3):245-8
pubmed: 17314665
Neuroreport. 2004 May 19;15(7):1109-12
pubmed: 15129155
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):671-84
pubmed: 20805589
Can J Exp Psychol. 2003 Jun;57(2):97-114
pubmed: 12822839
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:403-50
pubmed: 16022602
Psychophysiology. 2016 Aug;53(8):1217-23
pubmed: 27172997
Psychophysiology. 1996 Mar;33(2):103-11
pubmed: 8851238