Effect of Lesion Complexity and Clinical Risk Factors on the Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Dual Therapy Versus Warfarin Triple Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis From the REDUAL PCI Trial.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anticoagulants
/ adverse effects
Antithrombins
/ adverse effects
Aspirin
/ therapeutic use
Atrial Fibrillation
/ diagnosis
Clopidogrel
/ therapeutic use
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnosis
Dabigatran
/ adverse effects
Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy
Female
Hemorrhage
/ chemically induced
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Stents
Thromboembolism
/ mortality
Ticagrelor
/ therapeutic use
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Warfarin
/ adverse effects
atrial fibrillation
clopidogrel
dabigatran
percutaneous coronary intervention
risk factors
warfarin
Journal
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
ISSN: 1941-7632
Titre abrégé: Circ Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101499602
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
entrez:
8
4
2020
pubmed:
8
4
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The REDUAL PCI trial (Evaluation of Dual Therapy With Dabigatran vs Triple Therapy With Warfarin in Patients With AF That Undergo a PCI With Stenting) demonstrated that, in patients with atrial fibrillation following percutaneous coronary intervention, bleeding risk was lower with dabigatran plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor (dual therapy) than warfarin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor and aspirin (triple therapy). Dual therapy was noninferior for risk of thromboembolic events. Whether these results apply equally to patients at higher risk of ischemic events due to lesion complexity or clinical risk factors is unclear. The primary end point was time to first major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event. The composite efficacy end point was death, thromboembolic event, or unplanned revascularization. Our prespecified subgroup analysis categorized patients by presence of procedural complexity and/or clinical complexity factors at baseline. A modified dual antiplatelet therapy score categorized patients according to degree of clinical risk. Of 2725 patients, 43.1% had clinical complexity factors alone, 9.9% procedural factors alone, 10.0% both, and 37.0% neither. Risk of the primary bleeding end point was lower in both dabigatran dual therapy groups than warfarin triple therapy groups, regardless of procedural and/or clinical lesion complexity (interaction In patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, dabigatran 110 and 150 mg dual therapy reduced bleeding risk compared with warfarin triple therapy, with a similar risk of thromboembolic outcomes, irrespective of procedural and/or clinical complexity and modified dual antiplatelet therapy score. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT02164864.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The REDUAL PCI trial (Evaluation of Dual Therapy With Dabigatran vs Triple Therapy With Warfarin in Patients With AF That Undergo a PCI With Stenting) demonstrated that, in patients with atrial fibrillation following percutaneous coronary intervention, bleeding risk was lower with dabigatran plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor (dual therapy) than warfarin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor and aspirin (triple therapy). Dual therapy was noninferior for risk of thromboembolic events. Whether these results apply equally to patients at higher risk of ischemic events due to lesion complexity or clinical risk factors is unclear.
METHODS
The primary end point was time to first major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event. The composite efficacy end point was death, thromboembolic event, or unplanned revascularization. Our prespecified subgroup analysis categorized patients by presence of procedural complexity and/or clinical complexity factors at baseline. A modified dual antiplatelet therapy score categorized patients according to degree of clinical risk.
RESULTS
Of 2725 patients, 43.1% had clinical complexity factors alone, 9.9% procedural factors alone, 10.0% both, and 37.0% neither. Risk of the primary bleeding end point was lower in both dabigatran dual therapy groups than warfarin triple therapy groups, regardless of procedural and/or clinical lesion complexity (interaction
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, dabigatran 110 and 150 mg dual therapy reduced bleeding risk compared with warfarin triple therapy, with a similar risk of thromboembolic outcomes, irrespective of procedural and/or clinical complexity and modified dual antiplatelet therapy score. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT02164864.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32252548
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008349
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Antithrombins
0
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Warfarin
5Q7ZVV76EI
Clopidogrel
A74586SNO7
Ticagrelor
GLH0314RVC
Dabigatran
I0VM4M70GC
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02164864', 'NCT02164864']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM