Moving beyond individual barriers and identifying multi-level strategies to reduce anemia in Odisha India.
Adolescent
Adult
Anemia
/ epidemiology
Dietary Supplements
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Focus Groups
Folic Acid
/ therapeutic use
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
India
/ epidemiology
Iron
/ therapeutic use
Iron Deficiencies
Male
Multilevel Analysis
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ psychology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic
/ epidemiology
Prenatal Care
/ psychology
Prevalence
Qualitative Research
Young Adult
Gender norms
India
Iron deficiency anemia
Social norms
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Apr 2020
06 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
20
06
2019
accepted:
24
03
2020
entrez:
8
4
2020
pubmed:
8
4
2020
medline:
25
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To reduce the prevalence of anemia, the Indian government recommends daily iron and folic acid supplements (iron supplements) for pregnant women and weekly iron supplements for adolescents and all women of reproductive age. The government has distributed free iron supplements to adolescents and pregnant women for over four decades. However, initial uptake and adherence remain inadequate and non-pregnant women of reproductive age are largely ignored. The aim of this study is to examine the multilevel barriers to iron supplement use and to subsequently identify promising areas to intervene. We conducted a qualitative study in the state of Odisha, India. Data collection included key informant interviews, focus group discussions with women, husbands, and mothers-in-law, and direct observations in health centers, pharmacies and village health and nutrition days. We found that at the individual level, participants knew that iron supplements prevent anemia but underestimated anemia prevalence and risk in their community. Participants also believed that taking too many iron supplements during pregnancy would "make your baby big" causing a painful birth and a costly cesarean section. At the interpersonal level, mothers-in-law were not supportive of their daughters-in-law taking regular iron supplements during pregnancy but husbands were more supportive. At the community level, participants reported that only pregnant women and adolescents are taking iron supplements, ignoring non-pregnant women altogether. Unequal gender norms are also an upstream barrier for non-pregnant women to prioritize their health to obtain iron supplements. At the policy level, frontline health workers distribute iron supplements to pregnant women only and do not follow up on adherence. Interventions should address multiple barriers to iron supplement use along the socio-ecological model. They should also be tailored to a woman's reproductive life course stage: adolescents, pregnancy, and non-pregnant women of reproductive age because social norms and available services differ between the subpopulations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To reduce the prevalence of anemia, the Indian government recommends daily iron and folic acid supplements (iron supplements) for pregnant women and weekly iron supplements for adolescents and all women of reproductive age. The government has distributed free iron supplements to adolescents and pregnant women for over four decades. However, initial uptake and adherence remain inadequate and non-pregnant women of reproductive age are largely ignored. The aim of this study is to examine the multilevel barriers to iron supplement use and to subsequently identify promising areas to intervene.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a qualitative study in the state of Odisha, India. Data collection included key informant interviews, focus group discussions with women, husbands, and mothers-in-law, and direct observations in health centers, pharmacies and village health and nutrition days.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We found that at the individual level, participants knew that iron supplements prevent anemia but underestimated anemia prevalence and risk in their community. Participants also believed that taking too many iron supplements during pregnancy would "make your baby big" causing a painful birth and a costly cesarean section. At the interpersonal level, mothers-in-law were not supportive of their daughters-in-law taking regular iron supplements during pregnancy but husbands were more supportive. At the community level, participants reported that only pregnant women and adolescents are taking iron supplements, ignoring non-pregnant women altogether. Unequal gender norms are also an upstream barrier for non-pregnant women to prioritize their health to obtain iron supplements. At the policy level, frontline health workers distribute iron supplements to pregnant women only and do not follow up on adherence.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Interventions should address multiple barriers to iron supplement use along the socio-ecological model. They should also be tailored to a woman's reproductive life course stage: adolescents, pregnancy, and non-pregnant women of reproductive age because social norms and available services differ between the subpopulations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32252698
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08574-z
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-08574-z
pmc: PMC7137437
doi:
Substances chimiques
Folic Acid
935E97BOY8
Iron
E1UOL152H7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
457Subventions
Organisme : Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : OPP1182519
Références
Natl Med J India. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):81-5
pubmed: 26612152
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016 Oct.-Dec.;14(56):311-317
pubmed: 29336417
Indian J Public Health. 1999 Jan-Mar;43(1):3-5, 16
pubmed: 11243085
Adv Nutr. 2015 Jan 15;6(1):134-5
pubmed: 25593153
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Aug;115:139-43
pubmed: 24910005
Sante. 2002 Jan-Mar;12(1):22-30
pubmed: 11943635
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 12;18(1):281
pubmed: 29650002
Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529
pubmed: 7777651
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Jul;13(3):
pubmed: 27502366
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1189-208
pubmed: 10591279
Science. 2014 Sep 12;345(6202):1273-5
pubmed: 25214610
Midwifery. 2014 Mar;30(3):e56-63
pubmed: 24246970
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1830-1841
pubmed: 29673873
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:591-621
pubmed: 14744228
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 7;20(1):203
pubmed: 32033546
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 12;15:374
pubmed: 25887449
Matern Child Nutr. 2012 Jan;8(1):1-18
pubmed: 21978181
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 14;12(1):132
pubmed: 29137659
Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 May;55(5):985-8
pubmed: 1570808
Food Nutr Bull. 2016 Jun;37(2):132-43
pubmed: 27009090
Gates Open Res. 2018 Mar 20;2:15
pubmed: 29683135
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Apr;64(4S):S31-S36
pubmed: 30914165
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Sep;16(9):1667-76
pubmed: 23343620
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Feb 11;14:21
pubmed: 24512206