Lower limb lengthening and deformity correction in polyostotic fibrous dysplasia using external fixation and flexible intramedullary nailing.
External fixation
Fibrous dysplasia
Flexible intramedullary nailing
Journal
Journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0972-978X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101233220
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
13
02
2020
accepted:
23
03
2020
entrez:
8
4
2020
pubmed:
8
4
2020
medline:
8
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The study describes preliminary experience of the use of external fixators for limb lengthening and deformity correction in combination with flexible intramedullary nailing in management of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia. The retrospective study included 8 patients (mean age 11.6 ± 3.38 years; range 7-17 years) with polyostotic fibrous dysplasia operated on using external circular frame and flexible intramedullary nailing. Mean follow-up was 2.6 years. Surgical technique consisted of percutaneous osteotomy of a segment and application of circular external frame. The intramedullary nailing was done using two bent nails. Hydroxyapatite-coated nails were applied in three patients; five patients had titanium nails. Amount of lengthening (cm and %), amount of deformity correction, duration of external fixator use, index of external fixation, "nail/medullary canal at narrowest site" ratio, "nail-medullary canal at osteotomy site" ratio were analyzed. Results and complications were assessed according to Lascombes's classification. The mean amount of lengthening was 4.5 cm (or 13.7 ± 6.0% per segment). This gave a mean external fixation index of 32.5 ± 13.97 days/cm. The mean ratio of IM nail diameter/medullary canal diameter at the narrowest site was 0.22 ± 0.07 (range, 0.125-0.3 mm). No migration of IM nails into medullary canal were noticed. But in one case there was external migration of Ti-nail. In a year after frame removal, the results of treatment were classified as grade I in 7 cases and IIb in one case.At the latest follow-up control, mechanical axis deviation was found within normal limits in six patients. Two patients had excessive MAD of 11 and 28 mm. In the first case a partial varus deformity recurrence occurred at middle shaft site where a large dysplastic zone was presented. In the second case, a specific shepherd's crook deformity developed and caused excessive MAD. Mean lower limb length discrepancy varied from 1 to 15 mm. There are advantages of using elastic intramedullary nailing and external fixation in the treatment of limb length discrepancy and deformity of long bones in patients with PFD. This strategy ensures reduced external fixation time and high accuracy of alignment. Intramedullary nails left in situ, especially nails with HA-coating, seem to prevent deformity recurrence and stimulate remodeling in dysplastic fibrous zones.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32256003
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.014
pii: S0972-978X(20)30098-2
pmc: PMC7125318
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
192-198Informations de copyright
© 2020 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Oct;98(6):629-37
pubmed: 22981643
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 Sep;14(9):741-753
pubmed: 28817981
J Child Orthop. 2016 Dec;10(6):499-509
pubmed: 27826905
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012 May 24;7 Suppl 1:S1
pubmed: 22640754
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jun 13;14(1):139
pubmed: 31196103
N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 12;325(24):1688-95
pubmed: 1944469
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1077-83
pubmed: 17785749
Biomed Mater. 2019 Jan 07;14(2):025005
pubmed: 30523859
J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Dec;21 Suppl 2:P105-9
pubmed: 17228997
Int Orthop. 2015 Dec;39(12):2423-31
pubmed: 26150332
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2016 Jan;25(1):11-6
pubmed: 26426508
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2016 Apr;11(1):37-49
pubmed: 26873644
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1558-67
pubmed: 24249535
J Child Orthop. 2014 Dec;8(6):505-11
pubmed: 25409925
J Child Orthop. 2010 Dec;4(6):507-17
pubmed: 22132028
Injury. 2019 Jun;50 Suppl 1:S79-S86
pubmed: 30987742
J Orthop. 2019 Nov 12;19:189-193
pubmed: 32025131
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003 May;12(3):155-77
pubmed: 12703030
Nature. 1989 Aug 31;340(6236):692-6
pubmed: 2549426