Thermal behavior and viscoelastic properties of gutta-percha used for back-filling the root canal.

Differential scanning calorimetry Gutta-percha Root canal obturation Viscoelastic substances

Journal

Journal of dental sciences
ISSN: 2213-8862
Titre abrégé: J Dent Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101293181

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 16 09 2019
revised: 16 10 2019
entrez: 8 4 2020
pubmed: 8 4 2020
medline: 8 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In clinical operations, qualitative differences in the texture and operational feeling of the regular type and soft type back-filled gutta-percha are readily discernible. This study aimed to investigate and compare the thermal behavior and physical properties of the two gutta-percha materials. The chemical compositions of regular and soft type Gutta-Percha Obturator® pellets were examined via energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The thermal behaviors of the pellets during heating and cooling were evaluated using a differential scanning calorimeter. Finally, the viscoelastic properties of the two materials during cooling were assessed using a modular compact rheometer. The soft type gutta-percha contained a greater atomic percentage of zinc than the regular type material. In addition, the soft type gutta-percha exhibited exothermic peaks during cooling, whereas the regular type gutta-percha did not. The two materials exhibited different viscoelastic behaviors under cooling. In particular, the rate of change of the loss factor for the soft type gutta-percha was more than that of the regular type gutta-percha at temperature lower than 80°C. The soft type gutta-percha underwent significant crystallization during cooling, and therefore exhibited pronounced volume shrinkage. Furthermore, the soft type gutta-percha underwent a greater rate of change in viscoelasticity under cooling than the regular type gutta-percha, and exhibited poorer physical stability. Consequently, in the back-packing procedure, soft type gutta-percha must be compacted more often over time than regular type gutta-percha to ensure the same quality of root canal obturation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
In clinical operations, qualitative differences in the texture and operational feeling of the regular type and soft type back-filled gutta-percha are readily discernible. This study aimed to investigate and compare the thermal behavior and physical properties of the two gutta-percha materials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
The chemical compositions of regular and soft type Gutta-Percha Obturator® pellets were examined via energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The thermal behaviors of the pellets during heating and cooling were evaluated using a differential scanning calorimeter. Finally, the viscoelastic properties of the two materials during cooling were assessed using a modular compact rheometer.
RESULTS RESULTS
The soft type gutta-percha contained a greater atomic percentage of zinc than the regular type material. In addition, the soft type gutta-percha exhibited exothermic peaks during cooling, whereas the regular type gutta-percha did not. The two materials exhibited different viscoelastic behaviors under cooling. In particular, the rate of change of the loss factor for the soft type gutta-percha was more than that of the regular type gutta-percha at temperature lower than 80°C.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The soft type gutta-percha underwent significant crystallization during cooling, and therefore exhibited pronounced volume shrinkage. Furthermore, the soft type gutta-percha underwent a greater rate of change in viscoelasticity under cooling than the regular type gutta-percha, and exhibited poorer physical stability. Consequently, in the back-packing procedure, soft type gutta-percha must be compacted more often over time than regular type gutta-percha to ensure the same quality of root canal obturation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32256997
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.10.002
pii: S1991-7902(19)30865-7
pmc: PMC7109509
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

28-33

Informations de copyright

© 2019 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors deny any conflict of interest related to this study.

Références

Acta Biomater. 2014 Mar;10(3):1050-1063
pubmed: 24321349
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974 Jun;37(6):954-61
pubmed: 4598930
Eur J Dent. 2013 Apr;7(2):201-206
pubmed: 24883027
J Endod. 1983 Oct;9(10):407-10
pubmed: 6579164
J Endod. 1977 Aug;3(8):304-8
pubmed: 268405
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Nov;31(11):1139-44
pubmed: 15525394
J Dent Res. 1975 Sep-Oct;54(5):921-5
pubmed: 1058875
Dent Clin North Am. 1967 Nov;:723-44
pubmed: 5262492
Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):447-51
pubmed: 11556511
Int Endod J. 2003 Apr;36(4):302-7
pubmed: 12702126
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974 Jul;38(1):109-14
pubmed: 4525950
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Nov;21(8):2589-2602
pubmed: 28185092

Auteurs

Yung-Hao Hsu (YH)

School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Dentistry, Taipei Municipal Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Hsin-Hui Wang (HH)

Department of Dentistry, Taipei Municipal Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Yung-Kang Shen (YK)

School of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

James L Gutmann (JL)

Professor Emeritus, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Dallas, TX, USA.

Sung-Chih Hsieh (SC)

School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Dentistry, Taipei Municipal Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Classifications MeSH