Provider-reported challenges and barriers to referring patients to neuro-oncology clinical trials: a report from the Society for Neuro-Oncology member survey.

clinical trials neuro-oncology provider-reported referral barriers

Journal

Neuro-oncology practice
ISSN: 2054-2577
Titre abrégé: Neurooncol Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640528

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Historique:
entrez: 8 4 2020
pubmed: 8 4 2020
medline: 8 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Whereas much information exists in general oncology regarding the barriers to clinical trial referral, those specific to neuro-oncology are not yet well known. Trial barriers lead to lower patient accrual, which can lead to less-efficient clinical trials and slower improvement of the standard of care, which may negatively effect patient outcomes. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the clinical trial referral barriers that are specific to neuro-oncology to improve trial accrual rates. An electronic survey was completed by 426 Society for Neuro-Oncology members, of whom 372 are included in this report. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, means, and proportions, were used to characterize our survey sample. Only 22% of participants reported that their center tracks referrals to clinical trials inside as well as outside their own institution, with an estimate of less than 30% of patients referred. The most commonly reported provider-referral barrier was finding ongoing trials in the patient's geographic area. Providers also perceived that while considering participation in a trial their patients may not qualify for any trials, and if they do, may be unable to travel to the study site for follow-up. Additionally, practice location and provider and institution type all influenced referral patterns. Efforts should be made to broaden trial availability and eligibility criteria, improve trial referral tracking, and ensure patients and their caregivers understand the goals and importance of clinical trials to reduce barriers and improve trial participation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Whereas much information exists in general oncology regarding the barriers to clinical trial referral, those specific to neuro-oncology are not yet well known. Trial barriers lead to lower patient accrual, which can lead to less-efficient clinical trials and slower improvement of the standard of care, which may negatively effect patient outcomes. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the clinical trial referral barriers that are specific to neuro-oncology to improve trial accrual rates.
METHODS METHODS
An electronic survey was completed by 426 Society for Neuro-Oncology members, of whom 372 are included in this report. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, means, and proportions, were used to characterize our survey sample.
RESULTS RESULTS
Only 22% of participants reported that their center tracks referrals to clinical trials inside as well as outside their own institution, with an estimate of less than 30% of patients referred. The most commonly reported provider-referral barrier was finding ongoing trials in the patient's geographic area. Providers also perceived that while considering participation in a trial their patients may not qualify for any trials, and if they do, may be unable to travel to the study site for follow-up. Additionally, practice location and provider and institution type all influenced referral patterns.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Efforts should be made to broaden trial availability and eligibility criteria, improve trial referral tracking, and ensure patients and their caregivers understand the goals and importance of clinical trials to reduce barriers and improve trial participation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32257283
doi: 10.1093/nop/npz038
pii: npz038
pmc: PMC7104882
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

38-51

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.

Références

J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3737-3744
pubmed: 28968170
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3745-3752
pubmed: 28968168
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3760-3773
pubmed: 28968165
Cancer Treat Rep. 1985 Oct;69(10):1095-100
pubmed: 4042089
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Sep;12(9):1796-805
pubmed: 8083703
JAMA. 1982 Aug 27;248(8):968-70
pubmed: 7097966
Cancer. 2002 May 15;94(10):2681-7
pubmed: 12173337
J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Jun;20(6):783-9
pubmed: 23639619
Control Clin Trials. 1987 Mar;8(1):49-59
pubmed: 3568696
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3774-3780
pubmed: 28968173
Eur J Cancer. 1997 Nov;33(13):2221-9
pubmed: 9470810
J Cancer Educ. 1991;6(3):165-73
pubmed: 1931596
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Jun 07;:
pubmed: 31175826
J Intern Med. 1999 Jun;245(6):571-9
pubmed: 10395186
Control Clin Trials. 1985 Jun;6(2):156-67
pubmed: 4006489
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3753-3759
pubmed: 28968172
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Dec 6;87(23):1747-59
pubmed: 7473831
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:185-98
pubmed: 27249699
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Nov;19(11):1530-4
pubmed: 22989795
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3781-3787
pubmed: 28968169
Br J Cancer. 1995 Jun;71(6):1270-4
pubmed: 7779722

Auteurs

James L Rogers (JL)

Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Alvina Acquaye (A)

Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Elizabeth Vera (E)

Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Amanda Bates (A)

National Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.

Patrick Y Wen (PY)

Society for Neuro-Oncology, Houston, Texas, USA.
Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Terri S Armstrong (TS)

Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Classifications MeSH